Oh let people enjoy stuff you don't agree with

But how could the poor little multi billon dollar multinational companies keep thier bully monopolies if they have competent competition /sarcasm/

Hey, no kink shaming! What happens between two (or more) consenting adults that isn't causing harm to others is none of your business. Don't like it? Don't do it or watch it or play games themed around it. And don't be a sad individual who is only able to get joy from shitting on things others like. Because that life only ends in you dying miserable and alone, with nobody to mourn your passing and the last time your name is spoken being by the priest who rushes through a form-letter eulogy to get you sent off to the beyond as quick as possible.

Ted Cruz in shambles

You don’t have to like it, I’m certainly not into it. Still failing to see how it not being for you justifies puritanical bans

Wait, puppy play would get you banned? Isn't that just, like, wearing funny ears and walking around on hands and knees or whatever? Maybe at *most* a tail buttplug? I don't really get the appeal myself, but it seems pretty damn benign.

Payment platforms have problems with incest and furry content from the looks of that list.

No worries, Sex With Hitler is still available for purchase.

It does extend to others since they put animated, innocent "kid-friendly" looking porn on imageboards. And yes it's akin to beastialty which is vile. Why else would you dress up like an animal?

Sure. You like beastialty too?

This might sound like a good idea. But it is not, since lets say some topic is too sensitive for the payment processor, then they have monopoly on what game can and can not be allowed on Steam. So in the long run, this is a bad idea.

It's not puritanical when the subject hints at beastialty. If you want to fuck animals, seek help.

Does a diaper wearing fetish predispose someone to pedophilia? This reeks of slippery slope fallacy

On the one hand, oh noz, the incest games. Who will live without the low effort AI goon crap? On the other hand, why do the payment companies get to dictate what sales are made? It's my fucking money, or my fucking store. It's not the job of the payment processors to determine if I'm buying illegal goods, just that the money goes from me to the store.

They probably do wear diapers aswell.

That's different than cub stuff right?

Some, maybe. Regardless, if two consenting adults want to pretend to be animals or even pretend to be kids while they hump I really don’t see a problem.

That's the fucking thing. It's played up to the point that kids might find it and like it. It wouldn't be a problem if they didn't fucking have conventions celebrating it. With kids.

Why shouldn't the payment processors get a say in the payments they process? Illegal or not, why should they be forced to process payments that facilitate things against their beliefs? Steam could pursue other payment processing possibilities instead of acquiescing to their demands.

Oh damn, ya got me