Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Chebucto Regional Softball Club

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. The TI-34 is a fairly basic scientific #calculator.
A forum for discussing and organizing recreational softball and baseball games and leagues in the greater Halifax area.

The TI-34 is a fairly basic scientific #calculator.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
calculatorcalculatorsticalcti34matheducation
29 Posts 14 Posters 1 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

    @mdc

    I’m showing what TI basic would return.

    ? Offline
    ? Offline
    Guest
    wrote last edited by
    #9

    @futurebird Uh, sorry I'm dumber than usual today. Perhaps I should wait for the rest of the post to load before commenting

    myrmepropagandistF 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

      On a slight tangent I have just noticed that on the TI 84 int(x) is NOT the same as in python. Who is to blame for this? #ti84 #python #horror

      siderealS This user is from outside of this forum
      siderealS This user is from outside of this forum
      sidereal
      wrote last edited by
      #10

      @futurebird “learning math it’s important because it’s the same everywhere you go!” - my lying ass math teacher in grade school

      myrmepropagandistF 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • ? Guest

        @futurebird Uh, sorry I'm dumber than usual today. Perhaps I should wait for the rest of the post to load before commenting

        myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
        myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
        myrmepropagandist
        wrote last edited by
        #11

        @mdc

        nah it’s not you this is a little confusing— and I wonder if it should be considering these are educational devices.

        I do think part of the problem is “int” is a type in python— but it’s just an operation on the calculator.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • siderealS sidereal

          @futurebird “learning math it’s important because it’s the same everywhere you go!” - my lying ass math teacher in grade school

          myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
          myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
          myrmepropagandist
          wrote last edited by
          #12

          @sidereal

          You see this is why I don’t like this even if I can explain why it happens.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

            On a slight tangent I have just noticed that on the TI 84 int(x) is NOT the same as in python. Who is to blame for this? #ti84 #python #horror

            ? Offline
            ? Offline
            Guest
            wrote last edited by
            #13

            @futurebird they are doing what would generally be expected in their domains. a person using the calculator is unlikely to think of a float as an integer and fractional part, while a programmer is quite likely to think like that

            myrmepropagandistF 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

              On a slight tangent I have just noticed that on the TI 84 int(x) is NOT the same as in python. Who is to blame for this? #ti84 #python #horror

              philosophizes whilst swimmingA This user is from outside of this forum
              philosophizes whilst swimmingA This user is from outside of this forum
              philosophizes whilst swimming
              wrote last edited by
              #14

              @futurebird just piling on here: I would have defined it as your Python does (the integer part).

              I just asked Common Lisp what it does (my current learn-a-computer-language hobby) and it doesn't pre-define an integer function. The manual says "The ceiling, floor, round and truncate functions convert floating point or rational numbers to integers".

              su_liamS 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • ? Guest

                @futurebird they are doing what would generally be expected in their domains. a person using the calculator is unlikely to think of a float as an integer and fractional part, while a programmer is quite likely to think like that

                myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                myrmepropagandist
                wrote last edited by
                #15

                @risc Ok but that calculator also runs python which means you can get both results on the same device you hand to children.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • philosophizes whilst swimmingA philosophizes whilst swimming

                  @futurebird just piling on here: I would have defined it as your Python does (the integer part).

                  I just asked Common Lisp what it does (my current learn-a-computer-language hobby) and it doesn't pre-define an integer function. The manual says "The ceiling, floor, round and truncate functions convert floating point or rational numbers to integers".

                  su_liamS This user is from outside of this forum
                  su_liamS This user is from outside of this forum
                  su_liam
                  wrote last edited by
                  #16

                  @adardis @futurebird Are you a programmer or a mathematician?

                  myrmepropagandistF 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • su_liamS su_liam

                    @adardis @futurebird Are you a programmer or a mathematician?

                    myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                    myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                    myrmepropagandist
                    wrote last edited by
                    #17

                    @su_liam @adardis

                    **has existential crisis**

                    ? 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

                      The TI-34 is a fairly basic scientific #calculator. I’m a big fan because it’s easy to use and not overwhelming.

                      I was reading the manual and discovered it has two functions:

                      ipart(x)
                      fpart(x)

                      These return the integer and fraction parts of x.

                      ipart(2.34)=2
                      fpart(2.34)=.34

                      Great! So, uh.. What are these typically used for? Why include them on such a *basic* calculator? #calculators #ticalc #ti34 #matheducation #mathchat

                      myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                      myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                      myrmepropagandist
                      wrote last edited by
                      #18

                      I tend to imagine that every feature included on a calculator like the TI-34 had to fight to be there.

                      It's a very stripped down calculator and, as an educator I can tell exactly why everything else is there. From little things, like how it won't reduce square roots (this would make teaching the conceptual part of that skill very annoying) to the inclusion of doing stdev for only 35 numbers.

                      But the ipart() and fpart() have me stumped!

                      I must go deeper!

                      myrmepropagandistF ? 2 Replies Last reply
                      1
                      0
                      • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

                        I tend to imagine that every feature included on a calculator like the TI-34 had to fight to be there.

                        It's a very stripped down calculator and, as an educator I can tell exactly why everything else is there. From little things, like how it won't reduce square roots (this would make teaching the conceptual part of that skill very annoying) to the inclusion of doing stdev for only 35 numbers.

                        But the ipart() and fpart() have me stumped!

                        I must go deeper!

                        myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                        myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                        myrmepropagandist
                        wrote last edited by
                        #19

                        I'm starting to wonder if it's there because of one textbook in some country or region I don't know about... or maybe it's just something that people who design calculators think is useful that baffles everyone else?

                        llewellyL 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

                          I'm starting to wonder if it's there because of one textbook in some country or region I don't know about... or maybe it's just something that people who design calculators think is useful that baffles everyone else?

                          llewellyL This user is from outside of this forum
                          llewellyL This user is from outside of this forum
                          llewelly
                          wrote last edited by
                          #20

                          @futurebird when were these functions added? The TI-34 goes back to the 1980s, so it's possible they were added long ago for reasons relevant to that distant era, and kept for backwards compatibility. (Something similar applies to the behavior of int() on the TI-84)

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

                            I tend to imagine that every feature included on a calculator like the TI-34 had to fight to be there.

                            It's a very stripped down calculator and, as an educator I can tell exactly why everything else is there. From little things, like how it won't reduce square roots (this would make teaching the conceptual part of that skill very annoying) to the inclusion of doing stdev for only 35 numbers.

                            But the ipart() and fpart() have me stumped!

                            I must go deeper!

                            ? Offline
                            ? Offline
                            Guest
                            wrote last edited by
                            #21

                            @futurebird Engineers do ipart() and fpart() all the time when we need to truncate (not round) floating point values.

                            Doing ipart() and fpart() works on lists and arrays and imaginary numbers too - cool!

                            myrmepropagandistF Moss WizardM 2 Replies Last reply
                            0
                            • ? Guest

                              @futurebird Engineers do ipart() and fpart() all the time when we need to truncate (not round) floating point values.

                              Doing ipart() and fpart() works on lists and arrays and imaginary numbers too - cool!

                              myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                              myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                              myrmepropagandist
                              wrote last edited by
                              #22

                              @rhempel

                              Ok maybe doing it on a list would be worth it?

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • ? Guest

                                @futurebird Engineers do ipart() and fpart() all the time when we need to truncate (not round) floating point values.

                                Doing ipart() and fpart() works on lists and arrays and imaginary numbers too - cool!

                                Moss WizardM This user is from outside of this forum
                                Moss WizardM This user is from outside of this forum
                                Moss Wizard
                                wrote last edited by
                                #23

                                @rhempel @futurebird In sickness and in health, till engineers do ipart()

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

                                  The TI-34 is a fairly basic scientific #calculator. I’m a big fan because it’s easy to use and not overwhelming.

                                  I was reading the manual and discovered it has two functions:

                                  ipart(x)
                                  fpart(x)

                                  These return the integer and fraction parts of x.

                                  ipart(2.34)=2
                                  fpart(2.34)=.34

                                  Great! So, uh.. What are these typically used for? Why include them on such a *basic* calculator? #calculators #ticalc #ti34 #matheducation #mathchat

                                  E This user is from outside of this forum
                                  E This user is from outside of this forum
                                  Matt Panaro
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #24

                                  @futurebird I'm going to pull a guess straight out of thin air, but I think they might be intended for US Imperial Units use: where there's e.g. feet + inches, or pounds + ounces, etc: you can then perform additional arithmetic on the units "independently" when you can extract integer & fraction

                                  myrmepropagandistF ? 2 Replies Last reply
                                  0
                                  • E Matt Panaro

                                    @futurebird I'm going to pull a guess straight out of thin air, but I think they might be intended for US Imperial Units use: where there's e.g. feet + inches, or pounds + ounces, etc: you can then perform additional arithmetic on the units "independently" when you can extract integer & fraction

                                    myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                                    myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                                    myrmepropagandist
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #25

                                    @eigen

                                    OMG. This kind of makes sense.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • E Matt Panaro

                                      @futurebird I'm going to pull a guess straight out of thin air, but I think they might be intended for US Imperial Units use: where there's e.g. feet + inches, or pounds + ounces, etc: you can then perform additional arithmetic on the units "independently" when you can extract integer & fraction

                                      ? Offline
                                      ? Offline
                                      Guest
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #26

                                      @eigen@mattstodon.panar.ooo @futurebird@sauropods.win by the way it's not "US Imperial", Imperial units are a different set of units from US Customary

                                      myrmepropagandistF 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • ? Guest

                                        @eigen@mattstodon.panar.ooo @futurebird@sauropods.win by the way it's not "US Imperial", Imperial units are a different set of units from US Customary

                                        myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                                        myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                                        myrmepropagandist
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #27

                                        @ielenia @eigen

                                        it's not "US Imperial"

                                        yeah.... but is FEELs like that sometimes doesn't it?

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

                                          @su_liam @adardis

                                          **has existential crisis**

                                          ? Offline
                                          ? Offline
                                          Guest
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #28

                                          @futurebird What existential crisis? Just answer “yes.”
                                          @su_liam @adardis

                                          myrmepropagandistF 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • 1
                                          • 2
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups