If you write it down you have to pay attention to it. Back filling as you go is easier, and the other players can hold min maxers in their place as well as a DM. Like, I never played much but we knew a dude who would always claim undisclosed knowledge or experience relevant to whatever was happening. So eventually in-game we just started calling him a liar, and the DM went with. For example we needed food so he suddenly was an expert in foraging, but he really wasn't so no one else ate the berries and he had severe diarrhea the next few game days. It's self regulating, don't try stupid shit or stupid shit happens to you.

My backstory is 3 pages. I picked the noble knight background and they're my followers.

Parents dead. Given up as an orphan (depending on class and race). End of story!

I like a short backstory that provides hooks. "Disgraced son of a noble family that became a warlock when everyone expected a sorcerer" is fine. 12 pages where all the cool stuff already happened is bad. Write that as a book.

My backstory is one page long, I'm looking for a girl named Page, that's it.

So your character just pooped into existence without any characteristics?

A really important thing that I find a lot of writers need to learn is that backstory is not character depth. You can write an incredibly deep and complex character without ever telling us anything about their past. Depth comes from complexity. Complexity is found in contradiction. Real people don't have some simple set of programming that defines them. This is why I despise the alignment system; it's basically a textbook for creating uninteresting characters. In real life people often hold complex and contradictory (or seemingly contradictory) ideals. Or they profess one ideal but live out another. Think about a character who lives by a philosophy of always putting themselves first. Think about all the times they do something for someone else, not even really understanding or accepting that they're breaking their own rule. Think about why they would do that. That's character depth. Maybe there's something in their past that explains why they are that way, but we don't ever need to know what it is. And in truth, most people can't be summed up as one or two pivotal events. We're the sum of every single moment in our lives, all put together in one complex mess of a human being.

Yep. Wizard did it.

I have a vague concept of how they grew up around highschool-ish, but motivation is little more than “here for the vibes” lmao

meh. This is HIGHLY table dependent. Some groups want deep narrative drama. Others just wanna get high on the confiscated goods and smash goblin face

I tried this in first grade once. The teacher was not a fan lol

Some people want to try their hand at writing, which is totally fine. You can even be super proud of your work. The problem comes from expecting others to read it. Especially the DM, whose job it is to incorporate your backstory somewhat. So it is like forcing someone instead of on their own accord.

ah, a barbarian

The alignment system really isn’t that complex or strict. Lawful means you’re someone who generally holds to personal principles and chaotic means you go where the wind blows. Good means you do what’s best for everyone and evil means you do what’s best for yourself. Chaotic Good would be the hardest one to wrap ones head around. That would be someone who wants to help people but isn’t really sure _how_. They don’t have a strong oath like a paladin and they don’t know if they should be nice _everyone_ or if they should maybe be a little quicker to fight against the obvious bad guys. Ultimately though, the alignment is system is something pretty well explained in the DMG, from what I remember, but with D&D people just look at poorly informed memes and then complain about how rules don’t even function in the actual book. Their ignorance is not the fault of the source material.

My backstory: I am a [[class]] who is excited to go adventuring with my best buddies who I have no conflict with at all, and I am willing to die for them.


You know I like my characters when they show up as "I don't have a backstory" and you get so invested in them that they end up with "I have, like, seven characters with full sheets who are all linked to this character, and a whole culture to their site of origin." Source: Ask me about my Tabaxi (-... acutally, Tabaxi is its own plural)

A level 1 with more than a few bullet points of backstory doesn't make a ton of sense to me

Back stories are bad, you are not who you think you are going in, you are the meme about having to magic away your butt crack to prevent getting caught while sneaking cut cheese.

I don't mind it being deep, just don't fill it with your actions and deeds. A big part of fun for TTRPGs is 'play away from the table', which for the players is typically making art, backstory or builds for current or future characters. Most long backstories I read don't invalidate a level 1 character but mostly explore values, just as my real life story could be as deep as I choose to write it and I'd not even have the skills to be level 1. My suggestion is: * Get people together for a session 0. Only pitch the campaign and tone then, if not construct it collaboratively too. * Hand out pieces of paper or card face down, have each player take 1, and ensure there is one **between** each player. These cards say *Love, ally, rival, or enemy*. * Explain that players should make an NPC for their backstory that matches this word, and should make a shared NPC with the person next to them based on the card between them. * Now let them take another card of their choice. They can either make another NPC with this, or use it to make the relationship to one of their shared NPCs asymmetrical. * They can design their NPCs and backstory now or before session 1, up to them. Finally, explore what the players can **choose to do** to contribute between sessions to the game. If they don't do anything, that's fine, but they should have a way to meaningful contribute to something. Typically I encourage world building and cultural lore, such as unique foods and why that has a thematic resonance. This is hard to structure, I had a player who was a former forever DM, who played a knowledgeable librarian in a former monster hunter guild. I asked her to make some monster statblocks, as she'd know them inside and out in character. My advice to players: Make your backstory show that your character has done no huge deeds yet, and most importantly, **have everything that matters in it revolve around NPCs**. Not just is this the best drama, but NPCs can move, join factions, be redeemed, betray you, die and everything else. * That cost halfling village you design that perfectly exemplifies your character, but will never be seen in this urban campaign halfway across the continent? Make the most important part of it the mayor's daughter who happens to be your childhood friend. * The strange necklace that made you stronger but more angry when you wore it? The final time you saw it was when your brother stormed out of your co-owned business after a bitter argument. * The lord who helped you smuggle your liquor into the city? That's the same lord that wrongfully imprisoned the player character next to you. One of my favourite scenes from a campaign came when a player, after spending a session getting the chance to meet with a resistance leader, turned to the others and said "this is my ex-wife". That whole dynamic was interesting too, as both had come from a warrior culture and initially parted due to neither being the "strong warrior", now both trying to fight against that same faction a decade later. My all time favourite NPC was a talented tailor in an urban campaign, who owed one player character a favour and was generally fond of them all. Nothing like the party having a go to guy for fancy or silly outfit amendments.