Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Chebucto Regional Softball Club

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. The TI-34 is a fairly basic scientific #calculator.
A forum for discussing and organizing recreational softball and baseball games and leagues in the greater Halifax area.

The TI-34 is a fairly basic scientific #calculator.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
calculatorcalculatorsticalcti34matheducation
17 Posts 8 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
    myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
    myrmepropagandist
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    The TI-34 is a fairly basic scientific #calculator. I’m a big fan because it’s easy to use and not overwhelming.

    I was reading the manual and discovered it has two functions:

    ipart(x)
    fpart(x)

    These return the integer and fraction parts of x.

    ipart(2.34)=2
    fpart(2.34)=.34

    Great! So, uh.. What are these typically used for? Why include them on such a *basic* calculator? #calculators #ticalc #ti34 #matheducation #mathchat

    NazoN myrmepropagandistF 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

      The TI-34 is a fairly basic scientific #calculator. I’m a big fan because it’s easy to use and not overwhelming.

      I was reading the manual and discovered it has two functions:

      ipart(x)
      fpart(x)

      These return the integer and fraction parts of x.

      ipart(2.34)=2
      fpart(2.34)=.34

      Great! So, uh.. What are these typically used for? Why include them on such a *basic* calculator? #calculators #ticalc #ti34 #matheducation #mathchat

      NazoN This user is from outside of this forum
      NazoN This user is from outside of this forum
      Nazo
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      @futurebird On a graphing calculator that would have a myriad of functions no doubt.

      On a scientific calculator... Really makes you wonder if it was just an oversight or something, lol. I suppose through judicious use of parenthesis and repetition you could build something with that.

      ? 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • NazoN Nazo

        @futurebird On a graphing calculator that would have a myriad of functions no doubt.

        On a scientific calculator... Really makes you wonder if it was just an oversight or something, lol. I suppose through judicious use of parenthesis and repetition you could build something with that.

        ? Offline
        ? Offline
        Guest
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        @nazokiyoubinbou @futurebird

        My fuzzy brain vaguely remembers fpart() being handy for "clock arithmentic", converting decimal hours into minutes, for instance. And similarly for converting decimal feet into inches and decimal inches into fractions.

        But it seems like there was a more useful trick involving "slide rule math", something to do with fractional exponents, but I can't remember the specifics. Ring any bells?

        NazoN 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

          The TI-34 is a fairly basic scientific #calculator. I’m a big fan because it’s easy to use and not overwhelming.

          I was reading the manual and discovered it has two functions:

          ipart(x)
          fpart(x)

          These return the integer and fraction parts of x.

          ipart(2.34)=2
          fpart(2.34)=.34

          Great! So, uh.. What are these typically used for? Why include them on such a *basic* calculator? #calculators #ticalc #ti34 #matheducation #mathchat

          myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
          myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
          myrmepropagandist
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          On a slight tangent I have just noticed that on the TI 84 int(x) is NOT the same as in python. Who is to blame for this? #ti84 #python #horror

          ? siderealS ? philosophizes whilst swimmingA 4 Replies Last reply
          0
          • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist shared this topic
          • ? Guest

            @nazokiyoubinbou @futurebird

            My fuzzy brain vaguely remembers fpart() being handy for "clock arithmentic", converting decimal hours into minutes, for instance. And similarly for converting decimal feet into inches and decimal inches into fractions.

            But it seems like there was a more useful trick involving "slide rule math", something to do with fractional exponents, but I can't remember the specifics. Ring any bells?

            NazoN This user is from outside of this forum
            NazoN This user is from outside of this forum
            Nazo
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            @jakebrake @futurebird To some extent I could see such things, but remember, this is a scientific calculator. That means everything you punch in you're doing by hand. Really, at that point it's easier just to type in the decimal part in parenthesis where needed.

            Actually, I'm just not sure how you could use that well on a scientific calculator. It only truly makes sense when working with variables.

            myrmepropagandistF 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

              On a slight tangent I have just noticed that on the TI 84 int(x) is NOT the same as in python. Who is to blame for this? #ti84 #python #horror

              ? Offline
              ? Offline
              Guest
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              @futurebird What does the TI-BASIC version of `int` return? Perhaps they're trying to match the expected result?

              myrmepropagandistF 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • NazoN Nazo

                @jakebrake @futurebird To some extent I could see such things, but remember, this is a scientific calculator. That means everything you punch in you're doing by hand. Really, at that point it's easier just to type in the decimal part in parenthesis where needed.

                Actually, I'm just not sure how you could use that well on a scientific calculator. It only truly makes sense when working with variables.

                myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                myrmepropagandist
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                @nazokiyoubinbou @jakebrake

                It does have a little “operations” button where you can define a function with one variable.

                Maybe it could be used with that?

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • ? Guest

                  @futurebird What does the TI-BASIC version of `int` return? Perhaps they're trying to match the expected result?

                  myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                  myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                  myrmepropagandist
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8

                  @mdc

                  I’m showing what TI basic would return.

                  ? 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

                    @mdc

                    I’m showing what TI basic would return.

                    ? Offline
                    ? Offline
                    Guest
                    wrote last edited by
                    #9

                    @futurebird Uh, sorry I'm dumber than usual today. Perhaps I should wait for the rest of the post to load before commenting

                    myrmepropagandistF 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

                      On a slight tangent I have just noticed that on the TI 84 int(x) is NOT the same as in python. Who is to blame for this? #ti84 #python #horror

                      siderealS This user is from outside of this forum
                      siderealS This user is from outside of this forum
                      sidereal
                      wrote last edited by
                      #10

                      @futurebird “learning math it’s important because it’s the same everywhere you go!” - my lying ass math teacher in grade school

                      myrmepropagandistF 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • ? Guest

                        @futurebird Uh, sorry I'm dumber than usual today. Perhaps I should wait for the rest of the post to load before commenting

                        myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                        myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                        myrmepropagandist
                        wrote last edited by
                        #11

                        @mdc

                        nah it’s not you this is a little confusing— and I wonder if it should be considering these are educational devices.

                        I do think part of the problem is “int” is a type in python— but it’s just an operation on the calculator.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • siderealS sidereal

                          @futurebird “learning math it’s important because it’s the same everywhere you go!” - my lying ass math teacher in grade school

                          myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                          myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                          myrmepropagandist
                          wrote last edited by
                          #12

                          @sidereal

                          You see this is why I don’t like this even if I can explain why it happens.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

                            On a slight tangent I have just noticed that on the TI 84 int(x) is NOT the same as in python. Who is to blame for this? #ti84 #python #horror

                            ? Offline
                            ? Offline
                            Guest
                            wrote last edited by
                            #13

                            @futurebird they are doing what would generally be expected in their domains. a person using the calculator is unlikely to think of a float as an integer and fractional part, while a programmer is quite likely to think like that

                            myrmepropagandistF 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

                              On a slight tangent I have just noticed that on the TI 84 int(x) is NOT the same as in python. Who is to blame for this? #ti84 #python #horror

                              philosophizes whilst swimmingA This user is from outside of this forum
                              philosophizes whilst swimmingA This user is from outside of this forum
                              philosophizes whilst swimming
                              wrote last edited by
                              #14

                              @futurebird just piling on here: I would have defined it as your Python does (the integer part).

                              I just asked Common Lisp what it does (my current learn-a-computer-language hobby) and it doesn't pre-define an integer function. The manual says "The ceiling, floor, round and truncate functions convert floating point or rational numbers to integers".

                              su_liamS 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • ? Guest

                                @futurebird they are doing what would generally be expected in their domains. a person using the calculator is unlikely to think of a float as an integer and fractional part, while a programmer is quite likely to think like that

                                myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                                myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                                myrmepropagandist
                                wrote last edited by
                                #15

                                @risc Ok but that calculator also runs python which means you can get both results on the same device you hand to children.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • philosophizes whilst swimmingA philosophizes whilst swimming

                                  @futurebird just piling on here: I would have defined it as your Python does (the integer part).

                                  I just asked Common Lisp what it does (my current learn-a-computer-language hobby) and it doesn't pre-define an integer function. The manual says "The ceiling, floor, round and truncate functions convert floating point or rational numbers to integers".

                                  su_liamS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  su_liamS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  su_liam
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #16

                                  @adardis @futurebird Are you a programmer or a mathematician?

                                  myrmepropagandistF 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • su_liamS su_liam

                                    @adardis @futurebird Are you a programmer or a mathematician?

                                    myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                                    myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                                    myrmepropagandist
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #17

                                    @su_liam @adardis

                                    **has existential crisis**

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0

                                    Reply
                                    • Reply as topic
                                    Log in to reply
                                    • Oldest to Newest
                                    • Newest to Oldest
                                    • Most Votes


                                    • Login

                                    • Don't have an account? Register

                                    • Login or register to search.
                                    Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                    • First post
                                      Last post
                                    0
                                    • Categories
                                    • Recent
                                    • Tags
                                    • Popular
                                    • World
                                    • Users
                                    • Groups