Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Chebucto Regional Softball Club

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. The TI-34 is a fairly basic scientific #calculator.
A forum for discussing and organizing recreational softball and baseball games and leagues in the greater Halifax area.

The TI-34 is a fairly basic scientific #calculator.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
calculatorcalculatorsticalcti34matheducation
14 Posts 6 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

    The TI-34 is a fairly basic scientific #calculator. I’m a big fan because it’s easy to use and not overwhelming.

    I was reading the manual and discovered it has two functions:

    ipart(x)
    fpart(x)

    These return the integer and fraction parts of x.

    ipart(2.34)=2
    fpart(2.34)=.34

    Great! So, uh.. What are these typically used for? Why include them on such a *basic* calculator? #calculators #ticalc #ti34 #matheducation #mathchat

    NazoN This user is from outside of this forum
    NazoN This user is from outside of this forum
    Nazo
    wrote last edited by
    #2

    @futurebird On a graphing calculator that would have a myriad of functions no doubt.

    On a scientific calculator... Really makes you wonder if it was just an oversight or something, lol. I suppose through judicious use of parenthesis and repetition you could build something with that.

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • NazoN Nazo

      @futurebird On a graphing calculator that would have a myriad of functions no doubt.

      On a scientific calculator... Really makes you wonder if it was just an oversight or something, lol. I suppose through judicious use of parenthesis and repetition you could build something with that.

      ? Offline
      ? Offline
      Guest
      wrote last edited by
      #3

      @nazokiyoubinbou @futurebird

      My fuzzy brain vaguely remembers fpart() being handy for "clock arithmentic", converting decimal hours into minutes, for instance. And similarly for converting decimal feet into inches and decimal inches into fractions.

      But it seems like there was a more useful trick involving "slide rule math", something to do with fractional exponents, but I can't remember the specifics. Ring any bells?

      NazoN 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

        The TI-34 is a fairly basic scientific #calculator. I’m a big fan because it’s easy to use and not overwhelming.

        I was reading the manual and discovered it has two functions:

        ipart(x)
        fpart(x)

        These return the integer and fraction parts of x.

        ipart(2.34)=2
        fpart(2.34)=.34

        Great! So, uh.. What are these typically used for? Why include them on such a *basic* calculator? #calculators #ticalc #ti34 #matheducation #mathchat

        myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
        myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
        myrmepropagandist
        wrote last edited by
        #4

        On a slight tangent I have just noticed that on the TI 84 int(x) is NOT the same as in python. Who is to blame for this? #ti84 #python #horror

        ? siderealS ? 3 Replies Last reply
        0
        • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist shared this topic
        • ? Guest

          @nazokiyoubinbou @futurebird

          My fuzzy brain vaguely remembers fpart() being handy for "clock arithmentic", converting decimal hours into minutes, for instance. And similarly for converting decimal feet into inches and decimal inches into fractions.

          But it seems like there was a more useful trick involving "slide rule math", something to do with fractional exponents, but I can't remember the specifics. Ring any bells?

          NazoN This user is from outside of this forum
          NazoN This user is from outside of this forum
          Nazo
          wrote last edited by
          #5

          @jakebrake @futurebird To some extent I could see such things, but remember, this is a scientific calculator. That means everything you punch in you're doing by hand. Really, at that point it's easier just to type in the decimal part in parenthesis where needed.

          Actually, I'm just not sure how you could use that well on a scientific calculator. It only truly makes sense when working with variables.

          myrmepropagandistF 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

            On a slight tangent I have just noticed that on the TI 84 int(x) is NOT the same as in python. Who is to blame for this? #ti84 #python #horror

            ? Offline
            ? Offline
            Guest
            wrote last edited by
            #6

            @futurebird What does the TI-BASIC version of `int` return? Perhaps they're trying to match the expected result?

            myrmepropagandistF 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • NazoN Nazo

              @jakebrake @futurebird To some extent I could see such things, but remember, this is a scientific calculator. That means everything you punch in you're doing by hand. Really, at that point it's easier just to type in the decimal part in parenthesis where needed.

              Actually, I'm just not sure how you could use that well on a scientific calculator. It only truly makes sense when working with variables.

              myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
              myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
              myrmepropagandist
              wrote last edited by
              #7

              @nazokiyoubinbou @jakebrake

              It does have a little “operations” button where you can define a function with one variable.

              Maybe it could be used with that?

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • ? Guest

                @futurebird What does the TI-BASIC version of `int` return? Perhaps they're trying to match the expected result?

                myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                myrmepropagandist
                wrote last edited by
                #8

                @mdc

                I’m showing what TI basic would return.

                ? 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

                  @mdc

                  I’m showing what TI basic would return.

                  ? Offline
                  ? Offline
                  Guest
                  wrote last edited by
                  #9

                  @futurebird Uh, sorry I'm dumber than usual today. Perhaps I should wait for the rest of the post to load before commenting

                  myrmepropagandistF 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

                    On a slight tangent I have just noticed that on the TI 84 int(x) is NOT the same as in python. Who is to blame for this? #ti84 #python #horror

                    siderealS This user is from outside of this forum
                    siderealS This user is from outside of this forum
                    sidereal
                    wrote last edited by
                    #10

                    @futurebird “learning math it’s important because it’s the same everywhere you go!” - my lying ass math teacher in grade school

                    myrmepropagandistF 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • ? Guest

                      @futurebird Uh, sorry I'm dumber than usual today. Perhaps I should wait for the rest of the post to load before commenting

                      myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                      myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                      myrmepropagandist
                      wrote last edited by
                      #11

                      @mdc

                      nah it’s not you this is a little confusing— and I wonder if it should be considering these are educational devices.

                      I do think part of the problem is “int” is a type in python— but it’s just an operation on the calculator.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • siderealS sidereal

                        @futurebird “learning math it’s important because it’s the same everywhere you go!” - my lying ass math teacher in grade school

                        myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                        myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                        myrmepropagandist
                        wrote last edited by
                        #12

                        @sidereal

                        You see this is why I don’t like this even if I can explain why it happens.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

                          On a slight tangent I have just noticed that on the TI 84 int(x) is NOT the same as in python. Who is to blame for this? #ti84 #python #horror

                          ? Offline
                          ? Offline
                          Guest
                          wrote last edited by
                          #13

                          @futurebird they are doing what would generally be expected in their domains. a person using the calculator is unlikely to think of a float as an integer and fractional part, while a programmer is quite likely to think like that

                          myrmepropagandistF 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • ? Guest

                            @futurebird they are doing what would generally be expected in their domains. a person using the calculator is unlikely to think of a float as an integer and fractional part, while a programmer is quite likely to think like that

                            myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                            myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                            myrmepropagandist
                            wrote last edited by
                            #14

                            @risc Ok but that calculator also runs python which means you can get both results on the same device you hand to children.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0

                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Don't have an account? Register

                            • Login or register to search.
                            Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular
                            • World
                            • Users
                            • Groups