It heavily relies on the players actually being consistent with their characterization. I don't think I'm being controversial when I say that's being generous to the players which make memes about alignment.

Pathfinder did away with alignments completely though

I'm starting to starting think that DND alignment charts are just the political compass for people who are not into politics (or maybe the other way around?)

Meanwhile I'm here as a Changeling: the Dreaming main happy with unseelie and seelie.

Excuse me that's clearly ARLO, the dog from Dungeons and Daddies season 3

last i checked it was in some weird limbo state sorta? but yeah i think the law/chaos axis was removed for Remastered

There are holy and unholy sanctifications, which pretty much only effect extraplanar beings and those that bargain with them (Clerics, Paladins)

It sounds counterintuitive, but I think lawful and chaotic should be the other way around. Libertarians (in the sense it's used here) tend to support freedom through fairness and consistency of the law, whereas for authoritarians the law is whatever the person in charge feels like.

plenty of folks are playing old editions or clones thereof now though

Now you get [edicts and anathemas](https://2e.aonprd.com/Rules.aspx?ID=2045) instead of a general good/evil that you're obligated to follow. There aren't alignments in Pathfinder 2E after the remaster.