A forum for discussing and organizing recreational softball and baseball games and leagues in the greater Halifax area.
Doesn't hurt as bad as a d4
-
A side in this case is a specific area that allows for differentiating outcomes
-
It has 2 surfaces. It has 4 or 6 sides it can rest on IMHO. I'd need to play with it to find out.
-
An ideal coin is perfectly flat.
-
It needs a designation, why is said what i said. You don't call side on a coin flip because your only choices are heads or tails
-
It needs a designation, why is said what i said. You don't call side on a coin flip because your only choices are heads or tails
-
You were? No one said anything, and you replied to me with a "flaw" in what I said? Why would you just not agree? Or upvote? It's weird that you would say I was wrong then say you were doing it to support my statement.
-
You were? No one said anything, and you replied to me with a "flaw" in what I said? Why would you just not agree? Or upvote? It's weird that you would say I was wrong then say you were doing it to support my statement.Oh great, a contrarian. "Every time someone replies to me, it necessarily must be an attack that I need to squash with full force." An awesome character trait. The original point you were answering to was: A coin has 3 sides, because there are 3 potential areas where a coin can land. Your point was: Only that it can land on an area doesn't mean that that point is a side (as in a side that counts as a result). I said: Yes, even on a die there are areas where the die can stand that are not counted as sides. Now the question to you, mister contrarian: How was that a flaw to your argument? Please tell me, how a thinking human being that can read can seriously interpret that as me pointing out a flaw to your argument? I hate small ego contrarians who feel the need to constantly find attacks from all sides and if they don't find them, they make them up. It's the online equivalent of a teenager going "What are you looking at?"
-
Oh great, a contrarian. "Every time someone replies to me, it necessarily must be an attack that I need to squash with full force." An awesome character trait. The original point you were answering to was: A coin has 3 sides, because there are 3 potential areas where a coin can land. Your point was: Only that it can land on an area doesn't mean that that point is a side (as in a side that counts as a result). I said: Yes, even on a die there are areas where the die can stand that are not counted as sides. Now the question to you, mister contrarian: How was that a flaw to your argument? Please tell me, how a thinking human being that can read can seriously interpret that as me pointing out a flaw to your argument? I hate small ego contrarians who feel the need to constantly find attacks from all sides and if they don't find them, they make them up. It's the online equivalent of a teenager going "What are you looking at?">A die can land and stand on a corner if you do it precisely enough. You didn't say yes... and that doesn't look like you agree to anything. If anything, it seems like a sarcastic reply because clearly you had to point out the 3rd side of a coin... Again, you could have just agreed or given an upvote... instead, it seems like you're more interested in judging people and making up idea's about who they are...
-
a two sided die is called a coin
-
>A die can land and stand on a corner if you do it precisely enough. You didn't say yes... and that doesn't look like you agree to anything. If anything, it seems like a sarcastic reply because clearly you had to point out the 3rd side of a coin... Again, you could have just agreed or given an upvote... instead, it seems like you're more interested in judging people and making up idea's about who they are...
-
the flattening is what makes them not spheres and have sides. If we applied this "logic" then literally everything is just anything but in a different form - which makes no sensecongrats on getting the joke
-
Oh great, a contrarian. "Every time someone replies to me, it necessarily must be an attack that I need to squash with full force." An awesome character trait. The original point you were answering to was: A coin has 3 sides, because there are 3 potential areas where a coin can land. Your point was: Only that it can land on an area doesn't mean that that point is a side (as in a side that counts as a result). I said: Yes, even on a die there are areas where the die can stand that are not counted as sides. Now the question to you, mister contrarian: How was that a flaw to your argument? Please tell me, how a thinking human being that can read can seriously interpret that as me pointing out a flaw to your argument? I hate small ego contrarians who feel the need to constantly find attacks from all sides and if they don't find them, they make them up. It's the online equivalent of a teenager going "What are you looking at?"how dare you agree with them!!
-
a two sided die is called a coin
-
a two sided die is called a coinYup, my "d2" in my dice bag is a silver half dollar. Still call it my d2 though.
-
how dare you agree with them!!
