Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Chebucto Regional Softball Club

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Runes
A forum for discussing and organizing recreational softball and baseball games and leagues in the greater Halifax area.

Runes

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
rpgmemes
68 Posts 47 Posters 80 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Track_ShovelT Track_Shovel
    This post did not contain any content.
    Link Preview Image
    G This user is from outside of this forum
    G This user is from outside of this forum
    grue@lemmy.world
    wrote last edited by
    #9
    I assume "danger" and "drop & run" would be straightforward enough, but does casting comprehend languages cause the wizard to understand the concept of radiation?
    K B ? 3 Replies Last reply
    0
    • ? Guest
      Cobalt 60 has a half life of 5.27 years. Assuming that a language lost to time is at least 500 years old, the rod should be fairly safe to handle. Heck, even after only 100 years less than 0.01% of the original amount of radioactive material would be left. But that aside - One of the items that can be found in the video game series Avernum is Uranium bars, which give you a nice unhealthy glow 🙂
      A This user is from outside of this forum
      A This user is from outside of this forum
      AwesomeLowlander
      wrote last edited by
      #10
      Somebody casted Repair on the rod
      LousyCornMuffinsH 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • ? Guest
        Cobalt 60 has a half life of 5.27 years. Assuming that a language lost to time is at least 500 years old, the rod should be fairly safe to handle. Heck, even after only 100 years less than 0.01% of the original amount of radioactive material would be left. But that aside - One of the items that can be found in the video game series Avernum is Uranium bars, which give you a nice unhealthy glow 🙂
        ? Offline
        ? Offline
        Guest
        wrote last edited by
        #11
        What if it was stored in a fridge
        Brave Little Hitachi WandG T 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • G grue@lemmy.world
          I assume "danger" and "drop & run" would be straightforward enough, but does casting comprehend languages cause the wizard to understand the concept of radiation?
          K This user is from outside of this forum
          K This user is from outside of this forum
          khanzarate@lemmy.world
          wrote last edited by
          #12
          I'd personally translate it to the closest word they have. If I decided they didn't have a word that was directly equivalent, in this case I'd use the closest word, "light-emitting".
          ? 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • ? Guest
            I asked Chat GPT: Approximate unshielded dose rates: At 1 m: ≈ 5.2×10^4 Sv/h (≈51,800 Sv/h) — fatal essentially instantaneously (seconds or less). At 3 m: ≈ 5.8×10^3 Sv/h — fatal within seconds. At 10 m: ≈ 5.18×10^2 Sv/h — fatal within tens of seconds. At 30 m: ≈ 5.8×10^1 Sv/h — severe, life‑threatening in minutes. At 100 m: ≈ 5.2 Sv/h — dangerous; a few hours would produce fatal/serious acute radiation syndrome. (For perspective: an acute whole‑body dose of ~4–5 Sv often causes death without intensive medical care; 1 Sv already causes significant radiation sickness.) These are conservative, point‑source, unshielded estimates for whole‑body dose from the gammas. Being closer, or in contact, or staying in the field increases dose proportionally.
            ? Offline
            ? Offline
            Guest
            wrote last edited by
            #13
            >Back to me again. I'm sorry my radioactive physics game is weak and I had to speculatively look it up. That's a lot of downvotes, yet no one decided to share the math themselves. I asked my toddler about the radiation and she said "nana" and then with emphasis "nana" once more. The downvotes are because our two methods of finding an answer are roughly equally likely to returning a reliable answer. Mine is slightly better for the climate, maybe. That will likely change as she grows up and uses up more resources. I'll ask her to do the math on that one later, she is busy eating a book right now.
            ? 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Track_ShovelT Track_Shovel
              This post did not contain any content.
              Link Preview Image
              ? Offline
              ? Offline
              Guest
              wrote last edited by
              #14
              Isn't the blue glow only present under water (or other transparent medium with a similarly high index of refraction)?
              ? 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Track_ShovelT Track_Shovel
                This post did not contain any content.
                Link Preview Image
                ? Offline
                ? Offline
                Guest
                wrote last edited by
                #15
                Hopefully there's one of these around: [Material Safety Data Sheet for cobalt 60](https://cdn.images.fecom-media.com/FE00001072/documents/B8A49589+-+Sealed+Radioactive+Source+-+Cobalt-60+-+SDS.pdf).
                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • ? Guest
                  Isn't the blue glow only present under water (or other transparent medium with a similarly high index of refraction)?
                  ? Offline
                  ? Offline
                  Guest
                  wrote last edited by
                  #16
                  It's technically slightly visible in air; if actually visible at all in air it means the level of radiation is ludicrously deadly
                  starman2112@sh.itjust.worksS 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • ? Guest
                    >Back to me again. I'm sorry my radioactive physics game is weak and I had to speculatively look it up. That's a lot of downvotes, yet no one decided to share the math themselves. I asked my toddler about the radiation and she said "nana" and then with emphasis "nana" once more. The downvotes are because our two methods of finding an answer are roughly equally likely to returning a reliable answer. Mine is slightly better for the climate, maybe. That will likely change as she grows up and uses up more resources. I'll ask her to do the math on that one later, she is busy eating a book right now.
                    ? Offline
                    ? Offline
                    Guest
                    wrote last edited by
                    #17
                    She's absolutely right! NANA, you dopes! Roll for speed
                    1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    0
                    • Track_ShovelT Track_Shovel
                      This post did not contain any content.
                      Link Preview Image
                      ? Offline
                      ? Offline
                      Guest
                      wrote last edited by
                      #18
                      https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/metallurgy.png
                      ? 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • I iamthetot@sh.itjust.works
                        If it's actively glowing blue, I don't think it's safe to handle.
                        ? Offline
                        ? Offline
                        Guest
                        wrote last edited by
                        #19
                        If it's actively glowing blue it means it's under water producing Cherenkov radiation and the water should shield you from the alpha particles.
                        A ? 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • ? Guest
                          I asked Chat GPT: Approximate unshielded dose rates: At 1 m: ≈ 5.2×10^4 Sv/h (≈51,800 Sv/h) — fatal essentially instantaneously (seconds or less). At 3 m: ≈ 5.8×10^3 Sv/h — fatal within seconds. At 10 m: ≈ 5.18×10^2 Sv/h — fatal within tens of seconds. At 30 m: ≈ 5.8×10^1 Sv/h — severe, life‑threatening in minutes. At 100 m: ≈ 5.2 Sv/h — dangerous; a few hours would produce fatal/serious acute radiation syndrome. (For perspective: an acute whole‑body dose of ~4–5 Sv often causes death without intensive medical care; 1 Sv already causes significant radiation sickness.) These are conservative, point‑source, unshielded estimates for whole‑body dose from the gammas. Being closer, or in contact, or staying in the field increases dose proportionally.
                          ? Offline
                          ? Offline
                          Guest
                          wrote last edited by
                          #20
                          You're not getting downvoted. ChatGPT is getting downvoted, and you just happened to be in the way. [These guys](https://ionactive.co.uk/resource-hub/guidance/co-60-cobolt-60-radiation-safety-data), the 2nd google link after AI, say that a 3540 Ci/130 TBq source would be around 500 Sv/h at 30 cm. Even Wikipedia says 45 Sv/h at 1m
                          ? 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • Track_ShovelT Track_Shovel
                            This post did not contain any content.
                            Link Preview Image
                            allnewtypeface@leminal.spaceA This user is from outside of this forum
                            allnewtypeface@leminal.spaceA This user is from outside of this forum
                            allnewtypeface@leminal.space
                            wrote last edited by
                            #21
                            That’s what you get for not casting it on the “This is not a place of honour” sign near the jagged black obelisks after encountering the colony of glowing cats
                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • A AwesomeLowlander
                              Somebody casted Repair on the rod
                              LousyCornMuffinsH This user is from outside of this forum
                              LousyCornMuffinsH This user is from outside of this forum
                              LousyCornMuffins
                              wrote last edited by
                              #22
                              i cast mending on the pile of lead, giving me a solid cubic foot of weapons grade plutonium.
                              ? 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • G grue@lemmy.world
                                I assume "danger" and "drop & run" would be straightforward enough, but does casting comprehend languages cause the wizard to understand the concept of radiation?
                                B This user is from outside of this forum
                                B This user is from outside of this forum
                                Barbecue Cowboy
                                wrote last edited by
                                #23
                                That is a really good question... I feel like radiation should have some sort of translatable element as a generic radiant danger, but for the rest... if it doesn't make sense without context in the source language, does it make sense after 'comprehend language'? Kinda feels like we need a 'comprehend science' or something if they wanted to grasp the idea of specific elements and units of measure.
                                ? 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • G grue@lemmy.world
                                  I assume "danger" and "drop & run" would be straightforward enough, but does casting comprehend languages cause the wizard to understand the concept of radiation?
                                  ? Offline
                                  ? Offline
                                  Guest
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #24
                                  Hmm, I think as a DM I would roll an arcana check to see if the wizard would conceivably have heard of radiation from arcane studies. It's reasonable to assume people with arcane knowledge would be the first to hear about the strange metal chunks that everyone keeps dying around. One of them would have had to have come up with a word, if not some variation on "death cursed"
                                  ? 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • Track_ShovelT Track_Shovel
                                    This post did not contain any content.
                                    Link Preview Image
                                    S This user is from outside of this forum
                                    S This user is from outside of this forum
                                    shinkantrain@lemmy.ml
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #25
                                    This forest of thorns looks really cool, I bet deeds are commemorated here
                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • ? Guest
                                      https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/metallurgy.png
                                      ? Offline
                                      ? Offline
                                      Guest
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #26
                                      There's always a relevant xkcd.
                                      T 1 Reply Last reply
                                      1
                                      0
                                      • K khanzarate@lemmy.world
                                        I'd personally translate it to the closest word they have. If I decided they didn't have a word that was directly equivalent, in this case I'd use the closest word, "light-emitting".
                                        ? Offline
                                        ? Offline
                                        Guest
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #27
                                        "cancer-light"
                                        K starman2112@sh.itjust.worksS 2 Replies Last reply
                                        0
                                        • ? Guest
                                          You're not getting downvoted. ChatGPT is getting downvoted, and you just happened to be in the way. [These guys](https://ionactive.co.uk/resource-hub/guidance/co-60-cobolt-60-radiation-safety-data), the 2nd google link after AI, say that a 3540 Ci/130 TBq source would be around 500 Sv/h at 30 cm. Even Wikipedia says 45 Sv/h at 1m
                                          ? Offline
                                          ? Offline
                                          Guest
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #28
                                          Oh thank god! I guess this is the "find the right answer by posting the wrong answer."
                                          ? 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • 1
                                          • 2
                                          • 3
                                          • 4
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups