A forum for discussing and organizing recreational softball and baseball games and leagues in the greater Halifax area.
Did you really think it would be that easy
-
The king is a puppet of a dictatorial deity. The solution is to overthrow god.
-
This post did not contain any content.Nobody would rule by birthright in a D&D world. Any leader of a country would have access to Clone, and would have no need for inheritance.
-
It seems like any sufficiently rich person, like a monarch, could essentially have someone on staff - maybe multiple people - whose entire job is to periodically cast True Resurrection, naming the rich individual. If they aren't dead, the spell fails; if they are, they come back to life, and can name their assassin.Or they could just have some Clones.
-
The king is a puppet of a dictatorial deity. The solution is to overthrow god.
-
This post did not contain any content.
-
Why what did I do? I phoned it the fuck in
-
Why what did I do? I phoned it the fuck inI think it's lovely
-
Why what did I do? I phoned it the fuck in
-
It seems like any sufficiently rich person, like a monarch, could essentially have someone on staff - maybe multiple people - whose entire job is to periodically cast True Resurrection, naming the rich individual. If they aren't dead, the spell fails; if they are, they come back to life, and can name their assassin.Assuming D&D 5e rules, this is easily countered by casting Gentle Repose on the corpse every 10 days, or any other method of preventing natural decay. True Resurrection can only create a new body if the original no longer exists.
-
Assuming D&D 5e rules, this is easily countered by casting Gentle Repose on the corpse every 10 days, or any other method of preventing natural decay. True Resurrection can only create a new body if the original no longer exists.I guess this comes down to DM fiat as for what constitutes "touching" the creature. For example, what if the person casting the spell had a hair sample, or a severed finger or some other item from the monarch's body, which they were also taking any of those steps to prevent decay of? The [3rd Edition](https://www.d20srd.org/srd/spells/trueResurrection.htm) version of the spell is even more ambiguous. RAW, it doesn't prevent you from "unambiguously identifying" the creature through a means other than touching the body even if the body still exists.
-
This post did not contain any content.NANOBLESSINGS, SON!
-
Nobody would rule by birthright in a D&D world. Any leader of a country would have access to Clone, and would have no need for inheritance.Funny thing, there was a 2e setting called [Birthright](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birthright_(campaign_setting)), which pretty much made the game about developing land as a lord, rather than dungeon delving
-
I guess this comes down to DM fiat as for what constitutes "touching" the creature. For example, what if the person casting the spell had a hair sample, or a severed finger or some other item from the monarch's body, which they were also taking any of those steps to prevent decay of? The [3rd Edition](https://www.d20srd.org/srd/spells/trueResurrection.htm) version of the spell is even more ambiguous. RAW, it doesn't prevent you from "unambiguously identifying" the creature through a means other than touching the body even if the body still exists.>For example, what if the person casting the spell had a hair sample, or a severed finger or some other item from the monarch's body, RAW and RAI that wouldn't work, otherwise you could cast Inflict Wounds on someone by merely having a strand of hair from them. The RAW answer would be to have someone cast Contingency + Gentle Repose, though at that point you may as well add in a teleport or something instead
-
Funny thing, there was a 2e setting called [Birthright](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birthright_(campaign_setting)), which pretty much made the game about developing land as a lord, rather than dungeon delving
-
Oh. I just learned about this. I have no involvement in this channel but this video was neat. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WsGk9M-4dq4](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WsGk9M-4dq4)I thought this was going to be spam. I recommend saying what you're posting a link to. Or at least something that makes it clear you're replying to a specific comment instead of posting that at random.
-
Secular Smite them back, easy.
-
Assuming D&D 5e rules, this is easily countered by casting Gentle Repose on the corpse every 10 days, or any other method of preventing natural decay. True Resurrection can only create a new body if the original no longer exists.Or stuff it in a bag of holding!
-
>For example, what if the person casting the spell had a hair sample, or a severed finger or some other item from the monarch's body, RAW and RAI that wouldn't work, otherwise you could cast Inflict Wounds on someone by merely having a strand of hair from them. The RAW answer would be to have someone cast Contingency + Gentle Repose, though at that point you may as well add in a teleport or something insteadThere definitely should some spells that work like that tbh, it's a classical trope of curse magic.
-
I guess this comes down to DM fiat as for what constitutes "touching" the creature. For example, what if the person casting the spell had a hair sample, or a severed finger or some other item from the monarch's body, which they were also taking any of those steps to prevent decay of? The [3rd Edition](https://www.d20srd.org/srd/spells/trueResurrection.htm) version of the spell is even more ambiguous. RAW, it doesn't prevent you from "unambiguously identifying" the creature through a means other than touching the body even if the body still exists.Once those items are removed from the body they become a separate object. Maybe useful in divination, but not touching the body. If this were true the party could just cut off some hair hand it to the cleric and all their touch spells would be infinite range.
-
There definitely should some spells that work like that tbh, it's a classical trope of curse magic.
