"The Fall of Modern Literature"
-
"The Fall of Modern Literature"
I encountered this phrase in the context of someone complaining about fan fiction. But, you can find this sort of notion about many of the arts: it could be "the decline of hip hop" or maybe "the decline of TV series" or just "the terrible state of the modern teen"
Or if you find those absurd what about "the decline in manufacturing quality" ?
Ah. Maybe that one has a point?
These pro-nostalgia arguments may vary in validity but they face common hurdles.
-
"The Fall of Modern Literature"
I encountered this phrase in the context of someone complaining about fan fiction. But, you can find this sort of notion about many of the arts: it could be "the decline of hip hop" or maybe "the decline of TV series" or just "the terrible state of the modern teen"
Or if you find those absurd what about "the decline in manufacturing quality" ?
Ah. Maybe that one has a point?
These pro-nostalgia arguments may vary in validity but they face common hurdles.
@futurebird Did someone point out to the person that Dante’s Inferno is fan fiction on the Bible fandom?
-
"The Fall of Modern Literature"
I encountered this phrase in the context of someone complaining about fan fiction. But, you can find this sort of notion about many of the arts: it could be "the decline of hip hop" or maybe "the decline of TV series" or just "the terrible state of the modern teen"
Or if you find those absurd what about "the decline in manufacturing quality" ?
Ah. Maybe that one has a point?
These pro-nostalgia arguments may vary in validity but they face common hurdles.
1. When comparing works of the past with what is made today nearly always there has been an increase in both volume and diversity. Today we have MORE music, more books, more art, most of it isn't very good.
2. We tend to compare what survived from the past, the most enduring and best work with the average work of today. (Architecture and furniture do this often.)
3. Related to #2 what is popular now, may not be what ends up defining the era when we look back.
4. Leave them kids alone.
-
1. When comparing works of the past with what is made today nearly always there has been an increase in both volume and diversity. Today we have MORE music, more books, more art, most of it isn't very good.
2. We tend to compare what survived from the past, the most enduring and best work with the average work of today. (Architecture and furniture do this often.)
3. Related to #2 what is popular now, may not be what ends up defining the era when we look back.
4. Leave them kids alone.
There is some interaction between these common place and comforting falsies:
* More history keeps happening the closer you get to the present.
* The Decline of ...."
These are based in similar statistical issues. It's all sampling errors.
-
There is some interaction between these common place and comforting falsies:
* More history keeps happening the closer you get to the present.
* The Decline of ...."
These are based in similar statistical issues. It's all sampling errors.
-
@futurebird although I do feel like "the decline of TV" might be accurate because in most places where someone might have been watching TV they could just be watching videos on an internet connection and have more choice over what they watch.
It's the same as how most people don't drive carriages pulled by horses; cars provide the same effect, but more convenient (because you can feed a car with a tube and it poops a gas)
-
@futurebird although I do feel like "the decline of TV" might be accurate because in most places where someone might have been watching TV they could just be watching videos on an internet connection and have more choice over what they watch.
It's the same as how most people don't drive carriages pulled by horses; cars provide the same effect, but more convenient (because you can feed a car with a tube and it poops a gas)
But that brings us back to it being a sampling error.
-
1. When comparing works of the past with what is made today nearly always there has been an increase in both volume and diversity. Today we have MORE music, more books, more art, most of it isn't very good.
2. We tend to compare what survived from the past, the most enduring and best work with the average work of today. (Architecture and furniture do this often.)
3. Related to #2 what is popular now, may not be what ends up defining the era when we look back.
4. Leave them kids alone.
@futurebird "kids these days don't have the survivorship bias that we do" is not the flex they think it is
I shake my head at the name "the greatest generation", because they defeated the Nazis and the imperial hegemony, without noticing the absolute fuckton of Nazis and imperialists in that selfsame generation.
-
"The Fall of Modern Literature"
I encountered this phrase in the context of someone complaining about fan fiction. But, you can find this sort of notion about many of the arts: it could be "the decline of hip hop" or maybe "the decline of TV series" or just "the terrible state of the modern teen"
Or if you find those absurd what about "the decline in manufacturing quality" ?
Ah. Maybe that one has a point?
These pro-nostalgia arguments may vary in validity but they face common hurdles.
@futurebird Oh, i know that one, it's the "Rock is dead, kid today don't listen or make good music like we had twenty years ago".
I usually take it as "I stopped listening to new music twenty years ago and have no idea what incredible things and bands happened in rock since then" ^^
-
@futurebird Oh, i know that one, it's the "Rock is dead, kid today don't listen or make good music like we had twenty years ago".
I usually take it as "I stopped listening to new music twenty years ago and have no idea what incredible things and bands happened in rock since then" ^^
@futurebird (of course, "rock" here can be replaced by almost any style ^^)
-
@futurebird although I do feel like "the decline of TV" might be accurate because in most places where someone might have been watching TV they could just be watching videos on an internet connection and have more choice over what they watch.
It's the same as how most people don't drive carriages pulled by horses; cars provide the same effect, but more convenient (because you can feed a car with a tube and it poops a gas)
@ben @futurebird "Decline of TV" if you mean actual broadcast/cable rather than writing of shows is a platform enshittification feedback loop. People who don't approve of it shifting to brain rotting right wing drivel and who aren't stuck in their habits move to better media, leaving behind only the worst audiences and making a financial incentive to dig in further on top of the political incentive. Similar thing happened a long time ago with AM talk radio then radio in general (Clear Channel).
-
@ben @futurebird "Decline of TV" if you mean actual broadcast/cable rather than writing of shows is a platform enshittification feedback loop. People who don't approve of it shifting to brain rotting right wing drivel and who aren't stuck in their habits move to better media, leaving behind only the worst audiences and making a financial incentive to dig in further on top of the political incentive. Similar thing happened a long time ago with AM talk radio then radio in general (Clear Channel).
-
@futurebird @dalias methods die as more convenient methods become available
people aren't using telegraph machines or using modems to dial up a BBS anymore, but we're still talking to each other over long distances by writing very short letters
-
There is some interaction between these common place and comforting falsies:
* More history keeps happening the closer you get to the present.
* The Decline of ...."
These are based in similar statistical issues. It's all sampling errors.
@futurebird I said something like this (i.e., that it's sampling errors) when Ray Kurzweil came to give an author talk at Google about _The Singularity Is Near_. He was silent for about a minute. It was pretty clear this possibility had never occurred to him before. Then he said something that didn't address my question, and moved on.
-
@futurebird I said something like this (i.e., that it's sampling errors) when Ray Kurzweil came to give an author talk at Google about _The Singularity Is Near_. He was silent for about a minute. It was pretty clear this possibility had never occurred to him before. Then he said something that didn't address my question, and moved on.
@RuchiraSDatta @futurebird
You mean it took him a whole minute to remember that he's doing it for the investments and reality doesn't matter?! -
@futurebird I said something like this (i.e., that it's sampling errors) when Ray Kurzweil came to give an author talk at Google about _The Singularity Is Near_. He was silent for about a minute. It was pretty clear this possibility had never occurred to him before. Then he said something that didn't address my question, and moved on.
