I really thought that post editing here would be way more disruptive than it has been.
-
I really thought that post editing here would be way more disruptive than it has been. I expected non-stop nonsense.
I can't even think of a single time someone had to drag out the "edit history" to get one over in an argument. Probably because there is only like one real argument I see a week. Which I also thought would mean things were boring but they aren't?
Networks are people.
-
I really thought that post editing here would be way more disruptive than it has been. I expected non-stop nonsense.
I can't even think of a single time someone had to drag out the "edit history" to get one over in an argument. Probably because there is only like one real argument I see a week. Which I also thought would mean things were boring but they aren't?
Networks are people.
-
@futurebird
I think its mostly just used for typosYou could make a killer spellchecker with the edit history data. You know if we lived in a parallel universe where LLMs were used to do useful good things.
-
F myrmepropagandist shared this topic
-
I really thought that post editing here would be way more disruptive than it has been. I expected non-stop nonsense.
I can't even think of a single time someone had to drag out the "edit history" to get one over in an argument. Probably because there is only like one real argument I see a week. Which I also thought would mean things were boring but they aren't?
Networks are people.
@futurebird in my experience, post editing was a serious problem in every previous internet space where it was provided. Really amazes me it is so rarely a problem here.
