A forum for discussing and organizing recreational softball and baseball games and leagues in the greater Halifax area.
Kinda crazy that Nintendo is still supporting cartridges in a brand new console in 2025...
-
It has an SSD sized on the assumption that games go in the slot. It has an SSD that's the price of *a* game, and will only hold a dozen. And they could probably get away with less, thanks to focusing on the negligible cost of a hole and some pins. Nintendo is only now figuring out that Virtual Console purchases should be transferable... at all. They are not qualified to handle a digital-only console. I think the idea of deleting a game and re-downloading it, for free, was a recent surprise to some of these people. The same way Sony's still trying to repeat the PS2, Nintendo's been trying to repeat the Famicom Disk System.
-
>> Have you contemplated the costs of slot + game cards vs. SSD? > They are not qualified to handle a digital-only console I mean they're one of the most profitable companies in the business. There's no reason they couldn't *become* qualified...They could. They haven't. They won't.
-
They could. They haven't. They won't.
-
Commenting on what they're doing right now is not meaningfully different. This started with *you* second-guessing their commitment to cartridges.
-
Commenting on what they're doing right now is not meaningfully different. This started with *you* second-guessing their commitment to cartridges.
-
Distinction without difference.
-
Distinction without difference.
-
My guy, if remarking that it's "crazy" isn't commentary on whether it makes sense, what is it?
-
My guy, if remarking that it's "crazy" isn't commentary on whether it makes sense, what is it?
-
My guy, commenting on what makes sense is not the same thing as speculating about what they're going to do or second guessing their commitment to cartridges. Anything else you'd like to make up?My apologies for remembering the words you wrote. If you don't like speculation, don't say things like "there’s no reason they couldn’t *become* qualified." Because that, in itself, is speculation. As surely as calling this situation "crazy" is commentary on whether it makes sense.
-
My apologies for remembering the words you wrote. If you don't like speculation, don't say things like "there’s no reason they couldn’t *become* qualified." Because that, in itself, is speculation. As surely as calling this situation "crazy" is commentary on whether it makes sense.
-
"They can" isn't, but "they can't" is. Sure dude.