Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Chebucto Regional Softball Club

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. But why?
A forum for discussing and organizing recreational softball and baseball games and leagues in the greater Halifax area.

But why?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
rpgmemes
94 Posts 49 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    Yeah, I mostly play Fate or nWoD. But a lot of people are really emotionally invested in D&D, so sometimes I think of ways to try to trick them into playing something different while they think they're still playing D&D.
    festnt@sh.itjust.worksF This user is from outside of this forum
    festnt@sh.itjust.worksF This user is from outside of this forum
    festnt@sh.itjust.works
    wrote last edited by
    #25
    that is one way of making people try out other gamea
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • ? Guest
      > It foists basically all mechanic decisions that aren't directly related to combat onto DM adjudication, and provides very little guidance. The idea here is that the D&D ruleset is supposed to be *permissive*, not *restrictive*: - **permissive** - anything not explicitly prohibited is allowed - **restrictive** - anything not explicitly allowed is prohibited The gameplay experience depends greatly on which of these directions you interpret rules from. So, when you say that it "provides very little guidance", that's intentional, because it allows the DM and the players to use the basic structure of the game to support and inspire having fun and being creative. It should be a foundation, not a cage. D&D was always intended to be an open framework for actual roleplaying. The munchkin concept of gaming the rules for min-maxing stats came later. Rules lawyers, be they DM or player, make playing less fun.
      ? Offline
      ? Offline
      Guest
      wrote last edited by
      #26
      I don't need to buy a set of books to give me permission to use my imagination, and I don't need it's permission to disregard rules that don't serve my campaign, or homebrew my own. Every ruleset of every tabletop game is optional. Sure, ignoring some rules can unravel the system, but every table is free to make that choice. I buy a set of books because I want an exhaustive set of balanced and play tested rules. I am under no obligation to use every rule, but I want to have them so I know if I choose to use them, or isn't going to break the balance. For instance, I've fully moved to GURPS. It has a reputation for being complicated because there are *lots* of mechanics available. I ignore the vast majority of them most of the time, but when a player wants to do something out of the ordinary, I can count on having a balanced mechanic available for guidance. I didn't have to worry about being too strict, or too lenient, or inconsistent the next time the same situation arises. 5e isn't "permissive", it's lazy game design. I quit after buying the Spelljammer set, which provided basically zero guidance for any of the actual spell jamming stuff. When the answer to every question is "The DM can decide to do it however they want :)”, you're not actually releasing a game system. Again, I don't need to buy a book to have permission to use my imagination however I want. I buy a book to give me balanced and playtested mechanics. WotC doesn't seem particularly interested in that.
      ? 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • ? Guest
        I've actually done it! I started at level 4, so I didn't quite do the full 1-20 journey, but I did indeed go to 20 on xp per enemy killed and not milestone levelling
        G This user is from outside of this forum
        G This user is from outside of this forum
        IndescribablySad@threads.net
        wrote last edited by
        #27
        How long did that take you?? The highest we’ve ever gone is level 11, and that took a couple of years.
        ? 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • ? Guest
          I suppose an approach that takes the general intention of your design but is a bit omre mechanically rigorous could be to separate out subclass levels? You level up in one class as always, and every few levels the thing you get on levelling up is a subclass level. Subclasses then only get four or so levels, so you could be a warlock 11 (archfey 1 / fiend 2)
          G This user is from outside of this forum
          G This user is from outside of this forum
          IndescribablySad@threads.net
          wrote last edited by
          #28
          The difference is pretty minor either way. I’ve never had more issues balancing this than I have with sorcerer burst damage or creation bards collapsing economies.
          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • G IndescribablySad@threads.net
            How long did that take you?? The highest we’ve ever gone is level 11, and that took a couple of years.
            ? Offline
            ? Offline
            Guest
            wrote last edited by
            #29
            About a year and a half. It was a game explicitly intended to just be full of difficult combat encounters all of the time, so it was pretty much the ideal circumstances for levelling quicky. Her last encounter had about 60,000 xp worth of enemies in it per player, without using the multipliers for multiple enemies
            G 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • ? Guest
              > Also any class that gets their subclass at level 1 or 2. To be fair those are also troublesome for regular multiclassing, or at least they are if you're not using the 2024 "definitely not 5.5E" classes. The paladin with one level in warlock or sorcerer is a perennial favourite for a reason.
              ? Offline
              ? Offline
              Guest
              wrote last edited by
              #30
              I'll always love a paladin rouge multi even if it's not the "best". there's just so many interesting story possibilities there.
              ? 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • ? Guest
                About a year and a half. It was a game explicitly intended to just be full of difficult combat encounters all of the time, so it was pretty much the ideal circumstances for levelling quicky. Her last encounter had about 60,000 xp worth of enemies in it per player, without using the multipliers for multiple enemies
                G This user is from outside of this forum
                G This user is from outside of this forum
                IndescribablySad@threads.net
                wrote last edited by
                #31
                Oh, wargaming dnd? How’d you like it? Did 5e stand up well or did it need a lot of homebrewing?
                ? 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • G IndescribablySad@threads.net
                  Oh, wargaming dnd? How’d you like it? Did 5e stand up well or did it need a lot of homebrewing?
                  ? Offline
                  ? Offline
                  Guest
                  wrote last edited by
                  #32
                  I enjoyed it enough to play it for all that time, at least! I'm not particularly keen on D&D as a system (regardless of edition) and don't care for the Forgotten Realms as a setting, I just enjoy playing TTRPGs with people I like and D&D is the easy one to get people together for. Since I had a good crowd, I was having fun. There were usually plenty of interesting tactical decisions to make, and all of us know the game well enough to get through complicated turns smoothly. Everyone involved would still RP in combat so it wasn't just dice rolling. Gotta talk some shit to the hideous aberration that just deleted half your hp, right? It was _mostly_ RAW, but with some exceptions. For the sake of everyone being able to tailor their builds to combat, magic items could be purchased at will with prices agreed upon out of character
                  G 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • ? Guest
                    I'll always love a paladin rouge multi even if it's not the "best". there's just so many interesting story possibilities there.
                    ? Offline
                    ? Offline
                    Guest
                    wrote last edited by
                    #33
                    Multiclassing because it's fun even if it doesn't work that well will always have a place in my heart. I'm currently playing a barely-functional monk/druid. I think I can get him to work, but right now his tiger wildshape is more of the paper variety
                    C 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • J jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
                      Yeah, I mostly play Fate or nWoD. But a lot of people are really emotionally invested in D&D, so sometimes I think of ways to try to trick them into playing something different while they think they're still playing D&D.
                      ? Offline
                      ? Offline
                      Guest
                      wrote last edited by
                      #34
                      I suppose I'm lucky enough to have enough friends into ttrpgs to build a group of players open to the system I like. I lost some who *were* emotionally invested in D&D, but frankly they were the least fun ones to play with (min-max munchkins and rules lawyers undercut by an unfamiliar system), so I'm not too upset about it. Plus I've been empowered with many more options for creative play, and blessed with players *interested* in creative play.
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • ? Guest
                        Because 5e is a simple game made for adolescents. It's easy to pick up, easy to build a character, and easy to run. The problem is once you start trying to do anything particularly interesting, it crumbles. It foists basically all mechanic decisions that aren't directly related to combat onto DM adjudication, and provides very little guidance. I mean, last I checked out have you the option to be proficient with various sets of craft tools, without actually explaining what that actually does mechanically. If you want to make interesting character builds, you have to transition to a more detailed system. I'm partial to GURPS myself, but Pathfinder 2e is a nice middle ground of detail while still being fairly familiar to someone used to D&D.
                        ? Offline
                        ? Offline
                        Guest
                        wrote last edited by
                        #35
                        > I mean, last I checked you have the option to be proficient with various sets of craft tools, but the system doesn't actually explain what that actually does mechanically. Chapter 8, "Between Adventures," "Downtime," "Crafting." Page 187 in the 2014 version of the Player's Handbook. It tells you exactly how long it takes and how much it costs to create items using artisans' tools. I concede that it's pretty generic, but it does explain what you can do, mechanically, with your proficiency in artisans' tools. (If the 2024 version of the Player's Handbook removed this guidance then I'm not sure what to say, except that I don't personally consider that version to be "5e.") Xanathar's Guide to Everything also has an extensive section in Chapter 2, beginning on page 78, that does a great job fleshing out each type of tool proficiency and providing novel ways to use them.
                        ? 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • S sunsofold@lemmings.world
                          Warlock: I promised my soul in exchange for great power. Rogue: To which great power? Warlock: All of them. Let them fight over it when I am dead.
                          ? Offline
                          ? Offline
                          Guest
                          wrote last edited by
                          #36
                          Ahh, an Elder Scrolls protagonist
                          FenrirIIIF 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • G IndescribablySad@threads.net
                            If you know anyone who has actually reached 20th level in a campaign, it might make a difference. I’ll put you in my will if I hit the lottery.
                            ? Offline
                            ? Offline
                            Guest
                            wrote last edited by
                            #37
                            I ran a campaign that lasted several years and everyone went to 20. Technically past 20, though we never did any of the epic stuff. It was 3.5 though
                            ? 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • ? Guest
                              I'm gonna respect to 1/1/1/1/1 fighter/fighter/fighter/fighter/fighter so I can action surge 5 times in a round.
                              ? Offline
                              ? Offline
                              Guest
                              wrote last edited by
                              #38
                              Your fighter is gonna be very disappointed when they find out which level they get action surge at
                              ? 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • ? Guest
                                I enjoyed it enough to play it for all that time, at least! I'm not particularly keen on D&D as a system (regardless of edition) and don't care for the Forgotten Realms as a setting, I just enjoy playing TTRPGs with people I like and D&D is the easy one to get people together for. Since I had a good crowd, I was having fun. There were usually plenty of interesting tactical decisions to make, and all of us know the game well enough to get through complicated turns smoothly. Everyone involved would still RP in combat so it wasn't just dice rolling. Gotta talk some shit to the hideous aberration that just deleted half your hp, right? It was _mostly_ RAW, but with some exceptions. For the sake of everyone being able to tailor their builds to combat, magic items could be purchased at will with prices agreed upon out of character
                                G This user is from outside of this forum
                                G This user is from outside of this forum
                                IndescribablySad@threads.net
                                wrote last edited by
                                #39
                                For war gaming, which system do you personally prefer, if you don’t mind my asking? I’m looking to molest some people with *something fresh* and pathfinder doesn’t always work out. I used to ask people on Reddit, but I’d rather not use that site again.
                                ? 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • G IndescribablySad@threads.net
                                  For war gaming, which system do you personally prefer, if you don’t mind my asking? I’m looking to molest some people with *something fresh* and pathfinder doesn’t always work out. I used to ask people on Reddit, but I’d rather not use that site again.
                                  ? Offline
                                  ? Offline
                                  Guest
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #40
                                  I'm not gonna pretend that I have an encyclopaedic knowledge of what's available, but my limited experience with Mythras 6E has been very positive and I really like how Lancer plays. Mythras has Runequest as its high fantasy counterpart, so if you want a D&D-ish experience that's probably where to look. I've not played Runequest though, I had been doing a worldbuilding project and grabbed Mythras as something that looked suitable for there being no magic involved. Lancer comes with a really cool setting, but it's obviously way off in a different direction to D&D and the like. It does at least have the benefit of outstanding art to get people interested, and it's very good at making players feel cool even at low levels
                                  G 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • ? Guest
                                    I ran a campaign that lasted several years and everyone went to 20. Technically past 20, though we never did any of the epic stuff. It was 3.5 though
                                    ? Offline
                                    ? Offline
                                    Guest
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #41
                                    I've never touched anything beyond level 20. I thought that's what the epic stuff was? Are there regular class features and such published for those levels too, or were you homebrewing by then?
                                    ? 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • ? Guest
                                      > I mean, last I checked you have the option to be proficient with various sets of craft tools, but the system doesn't actually explain what that actually does mechanically. Chapter 8, "Between Adventures," "Downtime," "Crafting." Page 187 in the 2014 version of the Player's Handbook. It tells you exactly how long it takes and how much it costs to create items using artisans' tools. I concede that it's pretty generic, but it does explain what you can do, mechanically, with your proficiency in artisans' tools. (If the 2024 version of the Player's Handbook removed this guidance then I'm not sure what to say, except that I don't personally consider that version to be "5e.") Xanathar's Guide to Everything also has an extensive section in Chapter 2, beginning on page 78, that does a great job fleshing out each type of tool proficiency and providing novel ways to use them.
                                      ? Offline
                                      ? Offline
                                      Guest
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #42
                                      >I concede that it's pretty generic and would benefit from some refinement That's my point. A couple paragraphs on one page, and an addendum in another book to *consider* giving the player advantage and maybe an "added benefit", again left entirely up to the DM. The Xanathar's content is nice, if again a bit vague, assuming your DM uses it. But that's still buried in an appendant text. And that's just one example. Called shots are another good example. Anything outside the narrow scope of the written rules is left up to the DM. That's not fundamentally problematic in a ttrpg, the game master always has the final say anyway, but it's lazy game design, and it's only getting worse with each release. I said elsewhere that I quit D&D after buying the 5e Spelljammer set, which dumped all mechanical decisions onto individual DM decision. I don't buy rulebooks to get permission to run my game how I want. I buy rulebooks for playtested rules.
                                      ? 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • ? Guest
                                        I'm not gonna pretend that I have an encyclopaedic knowledge of what's available, but my limited experience with Mythras 6E has been very positive and I really like how Lancer plays. Mythras has Runequest as its high fantasy counterpart, so if you want a D&D-ish experience that's probably where to look. I've not played Runequest though, I had been doing a worldbuilding project and grabbed Mythras as something that looked suitable for there being no magic involved. Lancer comes with a really cool setting, but it's obviously way off in a different direction to D&D and the like. It does at least have the benefit of outstanding art to get people interested, and it's very good at making players feel cool even at low levels
                                        G This user is from outside of this forum
                                        G This user is from outside of this forum
                                        IndescribablySad@threads.net
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #43
                                        Lancer seems interesting but terrifyingly involved between the fresh setting, combat that feels like two legendary monsters fighting, and the host of new adjectives I’ll have to incorporate into my vocabulary. I’d only heard about it once before, from a zee bashew video, and it seems far more fleshed out than what I expected. Mythras significantly cuts down on one of those, so I’ll probably try that one out. Multiple degrees of success and more gradation between the cost of actions seems pretty neat as well. Thank you for the recommendations! I’ll almost certainly need to chew on them for a while to really understand them, but I adore both setting and the mechanics behind them!
                                        ? 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • G IndescribablySad@threads.net
                                          Lancer seems interesting but terrifyingly involved between the fresh setting, combat that feels like two legendary monsters fighting, and the host of new adjectives I’ll have to incorporate into my vocabulary. I’d only heard about it once before, from a zee bashew video, and it seems far more fleshed out than what I expected. Mythras significantly cuts down on one of those, so I’ll probably try that one out. Multiple degrees of success and more gradation between the cost of actions seems pretty neat as well. Thank you for the recommendations! I’ll almost certainly need to chew on them for a while to really understand them, but I adore both setting and the mechanics behind them!
                                          ? Offline
                                          ? Offline
                                          Guest
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #44
                                          I will admit to being biased towards Lancer because I was already a big fan of one of the author's other work beforehand. Tom Bloom (ne Parkinson-Morgan) writes and illustrates [Kill Six Billion Demons](https://killsixbilliondemons.com/). I promise I do genuinely like the mechanics though. If you do decide to take a look at Lancer, there's a really powerful thing that makes it a lot simpler: [COMP/CON](https://compcon.app/#/). It manages character creation, initiative, tracking values in combat etc just like all the non-store parts of D&D Beyond, but it's a _lot_ smoother to use If you get a go at Mythras, have fun! I will have to quietly envy you because I don't a group to play it with
                                          G 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • 1
                                          • 2
                                          • 3
                                          • 4
                                          • 5
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups