Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Chebucto Regional Softball Club

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. FIND OUT BITCH
A forum for discussing and organizing recreational softball and baseball games and leagues in the greater Halifax area.

FIND OUT BITCH

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
rpgmemes
57 Posts 28 Posters 6 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.comS This user is from outside of this forum
    stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.comS This user is from outside of this forum
    stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    wrote last edited by
    #1
    This post did not contain any content.
    Link Preview Image
    ? ? infynis@midwest.socialI ? ? 5 Replies Last reply
    1
    0
    • RPGMemes R RPGMemes shared this topic
    • stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.comS stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      This post did not contain any content.
      Link Preview Image
      ? Offline
      ? Offline
      Guest
      wrote last edited by
      #2
      I'm every part of that meme and I like it! 😁
      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.comS stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        This post did not contain any content.
        Link Preview Image
        ? Offline
        ? Offline
        Guest
        wrote last edited by
        #3
        This is why I ask players what they want to do before calling for rolls after describing an area. Once checks are called, all decided actions are locked in, then I narrate how the scene plays out based on the rolls. If a perception check is needed for traps, they have already confirmed what they are currently doing and can't meta game around the consequences of it from having rolled low beforehand. If their actions are to search for traps, then they do so, but if they roll low, they are still considered to be actively searching and thus, I will narrate that they triggered the trap while searching due to the low rolls. This also has the bonus of letting people with good intelligence but low wisdom substitute Investigation in the place of Perception. If it's in battle, perception is rolled for traps when stepping into the square of a trap. If passed, you spot it and are assumed to be actively avoiding triggering it; if you failed, then well sucks to suck. This way, players can't mind trap themselves into doing nothing because they are constantly paranoid about their low rolls.
        ? 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • ? Guest
          This is why I ask players what they want to do before calling for rolls after describing an area. Once checks are called, all decided actions are locked in, then I narrate how the scene plays out based on the rolls. If a perception check is needed for traps, they have already confirmed what they are currently doing and can't meta game around the consequences of it from having rolled low beforehand. If their actions are to search for traps, then they do so, but if they roll low, they are still considered to be actively searching and thus, I will narrate that they triggered the trap while searching due to the low rolls. This also has the bonus of letting people with good intelligence but low wisdom substitute Investigation in the place of Perception. If it's in battle, perception is rolled for traps when stepping into the square of a trap. If passed, you spot it and are assumed to be actively avoiding triggering it; if you failed, then well sucks to suck. This way, players can't mind trap themselves into doing nothing because they are constantly paranoid about their low rolls.
          ? Offline
          ? Offline
          Guest
          wrote last edited by
          #4
          I like how pathfinder 2 has the concept of secret roles baked into the rules. I have my players character sheets open at all times and roll for them when they search a room. Keeps everyone in their toes and eliminates meta gaming
          ? ? 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • ? Guest
            I like how pathfinder 2 has the concept of secret roles baked into the rules. I have my players character sheets open at all times and roll for them when they search a room. Keeps everyone in their toes and eliminates meta gaming
            ? Offline
            ? Offline
            Guest
            wrote last edited by
            #5
            Ugh, I remember years ago my players threw an absolute fit when I tried rolling behind the screen for their checks without telling them. I appreciate that it's actually baked into the rules in PF2e While I like my system, there are situations where I would really like to have rolled behind the screen because the thing they rolled for is a secret door or something and now they are asking questions why I called for a roll but nothing special happened in my narrative pertaining to it.
            G 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • ? Guest
              Ugh, I remember years ago my players threw an absolute fit when I tried rolling behind the screen for their checks without telling them. I appreciate that it's actually baked into the rules in PF2e While I like my system, there are situations where I would really like to have rolled behind the screen because the thing they rolled for is a secret door or something and now they are asking questions why I called for a roll but nothing special happened in my narrative pertaining to it.
              G This user is from outside of this forum
              G This user is from outside of this forum
              grue@lemmy.world
              wrote last edited by
              #6
              I'm not a DM, but I think the common advice is "randomly roll dice for no reason occasionally so the players can't rely on dice rolls being significant."
              ? 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.comS stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                This post did not contain any content.
                Link Preview Image
                infynis@midwest.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                infynis@midwest.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                infynis@midwest.social
                wrote last edited by
                #7
                If you're playing D&D 5e, no perception check, no matter how high, will let you notice an object is actually a mimic. >**False Appearance (Object Form Only).** While the mimic remains motionless, it is indistinguishable from an ordinary object.
                ? D susaga@sh.itjust.worksS ? 4 Replies Last reply
                0
                • G grue@lemmy.world
                  I'm not a DM, but I think the common advice is "randomly roll dice for no reason occasionally so the players can't rely on dice rolls being significant."
                  ? Offline
                  ? Offline
                  Guest
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8
                  Unfortunately, if a trap goes off or they do spot one, players will tend to question why they didn't get to roll anything and you have to explain that you were rolling for them behind the screen. My players took great offense to that when it happened, unfortunately, as the rules at the time didn't really support the DM having that authority. So, I'm happy PF2e now has it baked in so that DMs are officially able to utilize that method of secret rolls.
                  ? 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • infynis@midwest.socialI infynis@midwest.social
                    If you're playing D&D 5e, no perception check, no matter how high, will let you notice an object is actually a mimic. >**False Appearance (Object Form Only).** While the mimic remains motionless, it is indistinguishable from an ordinary object.
                    ? Offline
                    ? Offline
                    Guest
                    wrote last edited by
                    #9
                    Yea and the pile of bones and gore next to the chest is purely coincidental
                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • ? Guest
                      Unfortunately, if a trap goes off or they do spot one, players will tend to question why they didn't get to roll anything and you have to explain that you were rolling for them behind the screen. My players took great offense to that when it happened, unfortunately, as the rules at the time didn't really support the DM having that authority. So, I'm happy PF2e now has it baked in so that DMs are officially able to utilize that method of secret rolls.
                      ? Offline
                      ? Offline
                      Guest
                      wrote last edited by
                      #10
                      Traps are puzzles. Even if they didn't roll high enough, you should still describe enough about their environment that they could reasonably deduce that a trap was there. https://theangrygm.com/traps-suck/ (I don't always agree with everything this guy says - especially when he strays away from the topic of games - but he's absolutely right about traps.)
                      ? 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • ? Guest
                        I like how pathfinder 2 has the concept of secret roles baked into the rules. I have my players character sheets open at all times and roll for them when they search a room. Keeps everyone in their toes and eliminates meta gaming
                        ? Offline
                        ? Offline
                        Guest
                        wrote last edited by
                        #11
                        GURPS has an official GM Control Sheet for you to fill out with your PCs base stats and things like Perception. This supports their recommendation in the rule books to secretly roll any check where the PC wouldn't really know if they failed. It's fantastic.
                        D 1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        0
                        • infynis@midwest.socialI infynis@midwest.social
                          If you're playing D&D 5e, no perception check, no matter how high, will let you notice an object is actually a mimic. >**False Appearance (Object Form Only).** While the mimic remains motionless, it is indistinguishable from an ordinary object.
                          D This user is from outside of this forum
                          D This user is from outside of this forum
                          dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
                          wrote last edited by
                          #12
                          Still, as a DM, it's far too tempting to give a little bit of this away and join in on the hijinks. **Me:** You find yourselves in a hidden library. On one shelf you see a series of tomes named "How Not to be Seen", volumes I-XX. **Newbie Fighter:** Oh sweet, those look handy. **Seasoned Rogue:** Aw fuck. NOBODY TOUCH NOTHIN'!
                          ? S 2 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • ? Guest
                            GURPS has an official GM Control Sheet for you to fill out with your PCs base stats and things like Perception. This supports their recommendation in the rule books to secretly roll any check where the PC wouldn't really know if they failed. It's fantastic.
                            D This user is from outside of this forum
                            D This user is from outside of this forum
                            dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
                            wrote last edited by
                            #13
                            Considering that was probably penned in the late 1980's, why isn't that standard kit for every other system?
                            ? ? 2 Replies Last reply
                            0
                            • D dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
                              Considering that was probably penned in the late 1980's, why isn't that standard kit for every other system?
                              ? Offline
                              ? Offline
                              Guest
                              wrote last edited by
                              #14
                              I don't know much about anything before 4e, which is my reference here. But yeah, it really should be. I jumped ship on D&D because they were just getting so lazy on mechanic content. I think it might be more widespread than WotC, but my only experience is a distant smattering of PF2, D&D 5e, and GURPS 4e ever since. But I wouldn't be surprised if the lack of attention to detail for actually running the game is a broad problem. We can't really put *all* the blame on the devs though, I think GMs who forget that it's their table, and some rulebook isn't the boss of them, make devs feel pressured to not "impose" rules and features in their sourcebooks. Like homie, give me tools. You're not holding a knife to my throat, I can chill on the nitty gritty if I want to. But *give* me the nitty gritty so I can decide for myself. I dunno, I made my choice, I think it's the best possible choice for my play philosophy. I think if more people considered my play philosophy, it would be the best possible choice for a lot of people.
                              D 1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              0
                              • ? Guest
                                I don't know much about anything before 4e, which is my reference here. But yeah, it really should be. I jumped ship on D&D because they were just getting so lazy on mechanic content. I think it might be more widespread than WotC, but my only experience is a distant smattering of PF2, D&D 5e, and GURPS 4e ever since. But I wouldn't be surprised if the lack of attention to detail for actually running the game is a broad problem. We can't really put *all* the blame on the devs though, I think GMs who forget that it's their table, and some rulebook isn't the boss of them, make devs feel pressured to not "impose" rules and features in their sourcebooks. Like homie, give me tools. You're not holding a knife to my throat, I can chill on the nitty gritty if I want to. But *give* me the nitty gritty so I can decide for myself. I dunno, I made my choice, I think it's the best possible choice for my play philosophy. I think if more people considered my play philosophy, it would be the best possible choice for a lot of people.
                                D This user is from outside of this forum
                                D This user is from outside of this forum
                                dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
                                wrote last edited by
                                #15
                                Exactly. Pragmatism wins the day. Or at least it does at my table. I'll have to shop around for more and better tools. Thanks for reminding me that there's a wider world out there. > But give me the nitty gritty so I can decide for myself. This resonates with me. But I also have to give an obligatory nod to Palladium Games where the nit and grit is the entire point. If you've never had the pleasure, the RIFTS character sheet makes (American) taxes look easy to file by comparison. You practically need a session zero and a session zero-*zero* to get started.
                                ? 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • D dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
                                  Exactly. Pragmatism wins the day. Or at least it does at my table. I'll have to shop around for more and better tools. Thanks for reminding me that there's a wider world out there. > But give me the nitty gritty so I can decide for myself. This resonates with me. But I also have to give an obligatory nod to Palladium Games where the nit and grit is the entire point. If you've never had the pleasure, the RIFTS character sheet makes (American) taxes look easy to file by comparison. You practically need a session zero and a session zero-*zero* to get started.
                                  ? Offline
                                  ? Offline
                                  Guest
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #16
                                  You really should dive into GURPS. Chris Normand has a good YouTube series in the basics, but the gist is that it's both the simplest and most intricate system out there. Basically everything is a 3d6 skill check, but there are thousands of pages dedicated to figuring out exactly what modifiers apply. The modularity is delightful, basically every rule is entirely and explicitly optional
                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  1
                                  0
                                  • ? Guest
                                    Traps are puzzles. Even if they didn't roll high enough, you should still describe enough about their environment that they could reasonably deduce that a trap was there. https://theangrygm.com/traps-suck/ (I don't always agree with everything this guy says - especially when he strays away from the topic of games - but he's absolutely right about traps.)
                                    ? Offline
                                    ? Offline
                                    Guest
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #17
                                    Disagree. that just erases the point of using dice and having consequences for missing the checks. I'll continue to use my system as described above for traps.
                                    ? 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • D dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
                                      Still, as a DM, it's far too tempting to give a little bit of this away and join in on the hijinks. **Me:** You find yourselves in a hidden library. On one shelf you see a series of tomes named "How Not to be Seen", volumes I-XX. **Newbie Fighter:** Oh sweet, those look handy. **Seasoned Rogue:** Aw fuck. NOBODY TOUCH NOTHIN'!
                                      ? Offline
                                      ? Offline
                                      Guest
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #18
                                      Well, is there some true sight or something that let's you see a mimic?
                                      D 1 Reply Last reply
                                      1
                                      0
                                      • ? Guest
                                        Disagree. that just erases the point of using dice and having consequences for missing the checks. I'll continue to use my system as described above for traps.
                                        ? Offline
                                        ? Offline
                                        Guest
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #19
                                        Who advocated for removing dice rolls? There's still plenty of room for dice rolls here, but it makes traps more interesting and engaging instead of a boring save-or-suck you blindside players with.
                                        ? 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • infynis@midwest.socialI infynis@midwest.social
                                          If you're playing D&D 5e, no perception check, no matter how high, will let you notice an object is actually a mimic. >**False Appearance (Object Form Only).** While the mimic remains motionless, it is indistinguishable from an ordinary object.
                                          susaga@sh.itjust.worksS This user is from outside of this forum
                                          susaga@sh.itjust.worksS This user is from outside of this forum
                                          susaga@sh.itjust.works
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #20
                                          Cool. Mimics breathe. Roll perception to see if you spot the motion of the mimic breathing.
                                          S ? 2 Replies Last reply
                                          0

                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • 1
                                          • 2
                                          • 3
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups