Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Chebucto Regional Softball Club

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Microsoft adds Steam games to its Xbox PC app on Windows
A forum for discussing and organizing recreational softball and baseball games and leagues in the greater Halifax area.

Microsoft adds Steam games to its Xbox PC app on Windows

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
games
19 Posts 11 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • K k1ck455kc@sh.itjust.works
    Theyre way behind the power curve with this one. GOG has had better multi-store integration for a while. I am surprised that steam is even lacking on this. Microsoft needs to make it so i never need to go into the steam app or the GOG app, and so i never want to, to play all my games. Thats the way to win and become number 1. Really if Play anywhere expands retroactively like 360 backwards compatibility did... They will have another great PR boom that brings users like myself back to their storefronts. I have to stop holding my breath for the xbox console library to gain cross compatibility though. Theres no way the Play anywhere program comes close to compensating for all of the classics locked to their consoles. If cross compatibility never happens i will feel slighted as a previous xbox user with a huge library of games.
    poopfeast420@discuss.tchncs.deP This user is from outside of this forum
    poopfeast420@discuss.tchncs.deP This user is from outside of this forum
    poopfeast420@discuss.tchncs.de
    wrote last edited by
    #5
    > Microsoft needs to make it so i never need to go into the steam app or the GOG app That's never going to happen with any store. Not Microsoft, not Steam, not Epic, not GOG. Either start pirating everything or "hope" one store on PC gets a real monopoly, so there is just one store to buy from.
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • misk@sopuli.xyzM misk@sopuli.xyz
      This post did not contain any content.
      ? Offline
      ? Offline
      Guest
      wrote last edited by
      #6
      Had issues with this type of integration with ubisoft connect and division 2. Had to reinstall the whole game again...
      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • K k1ck455kc@sh.itjust.works
        Theyre way behind the power curve with this one. GOG has had better multi-store integration for a while. I am surprised that steam is even lacking on this. Microsoft needs to make it so i never need to go into the steam app or the GOG app, and so i never want to, to play all my games. Thats the way to win and become number 1. Really if Play anywhere expands retroactively like 360 backwards compatibility did... They will have another great PR boom that brings users like myself back to their storefronts. I have to stop holding my breath for the xbox console library to gain cross compatibility though. Theres no way the Play anywhere program comes close to compensating for all of the classics locked to their consoles. If cross compatibility never happens i will feel slighted as a previous xbox user with a huge library of games.
        misk@sopuli.xyzM This user is from outside of this forum
        misk@sopuli.xyzM This user is from outside of this forum
        misk@sopuli.xyz
        wrote last edited by
        #7
        > I am surprised that steam is even lacking on this. This is an „underdog” feature - if you own the market like Steam does it could only ever harm sales on their platform. Some people don’t seem to be bothered by the grip Valve has on the market however. Not like Microsoft wouldn’t do that either if they were in the same position because both are ultimately out there to make as much money as possible.
        ? ? 2 Replies Last reply
        1
        0
        • misk@sopuli.xyzM misk@sopuli.xyz
          > I am surprised that steam is even lacking on this. This is an „underdog” feature - if you own the market like Steam does it could only ever harm sales on their platform. Some people don’t seem to be bothered by the grip Valve has on the market however. Not like Microsoft wouldn’t do that either if they were in the same position because both are ultimately out there to make as much money as possible.
          ? Offline
          ? Offline
          Guest
          wrote last edited by
          #8
          Valve isn't publicly traded, and while that doesn't make them 100 % trustworthy, I'd certainly give them the benefit of the doubt over Microsoft. They make a shit ton of money, but they aren't obligated to squeeze every last penny out of their customers. Sure, it would be nice to have 1-click installers for other launchers within Steam and then automatically list games of other launchers in the Steam library, but I don't even think Valve is the primary blocker here. Steam had the ability to add external shortcuts as long as I can remember, tools like Steam ROM Manager make use of that already. Tim Sweeney for example always likes to cry to the press how bad monopolies are with Steam and their 30 % cut and whatnot, he doesn't seem to grasp that part of the reason almost nobody uses Epic Games Launcher is that it quite frankly sucks. Where is your multi-platform launcher? Ah, need Heroic to do the heavy lifting for you. They could offer an official Flatpak on the Steam Deck, easily installed from the Discover store, that uses Proton for games compatibility, is usable with a controller and adds itself to Steam (and when installing games, adds them to Steam as well). I'm not _that_ bothered by Valve having that kind of "grip on the market" because in my opinion they are also _by far_ the best so I'd rather they own the biggest piece of the cake than anyone else.
          misk@sopuli.xyzM 1 Reply Last reply
          1
          0
          • misk@sopuli.xyzM misk@sopuli.xyz
            This post did not contain any content.
            ShadowedcrossS This user is from outside of this forum
            ShadowedcrossS This user is from outside of this forum
            Shadowedcross
            wrote last edited by
            #9
            I hope you can disable this, or at least hide the games from Steam, because the Xbox App is fucking awful and I'd much rather it just its exclusives, so I don't have to look for them.
            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • ? Guest
              Valve isn't publicly traded, and while that doesn't make them 100 % trustworthy, I'd certainly give them the benefit of the doubt over Microsoft. They make a shit ton of money, but they aren't obligated to squeeze every last penny out of their customers. Sure, it would be nice to have 1-click installers for other launchers within Steam and then automatically list games of other launchers in the Steam library, but I don't even think Valve is the primary blocker here. Steam had the ability to add external shortcuts as long as I can remember, tools like Steam ROM Manager make use of that already. Tim Sweeney for example always likes to cry to the press how bad monopolies are with Steam and their 30 % cut and whatnot, he doesn't seem to grasp that part of the reason almost nobody uses Epic Games Launcher is that it quite frankly sucks. Where is your multi-platform launcher? Ah, need Heroic to do the heavy lifting for you. They could offer an official Flatpak on the Steam Deck, easily installed from the Discover store, that uses Proton for games compatibility, is usable with a controller and adds itself to Steam (and when installing games, adds them to Steam as well). I'm not _that_ bothered by Valve having that kind of "grip on the market" because in my opinion they are also _by far_ the best so I'd rather they own the biggest piece of the cake than anyone else.
              misk@sopuli.xyzM This user is from outside of this forum
              misk@sopuli.xyzM This user is from outside of this forum
              misk@sopuli.xyz
              wrote last edited by
              #10
              It continues to amaze me how Valve fanboys are the only group here that is completely incapable of critique of their platform of choice and will defend it by trying to convince others that a commercial entity can be benovelent.
              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • misk@sopuli.xyzM misk@sopuli.xyz
                > I am surprised that steam is even lacking on this. This is an „underdog” feature - if you own the market like Steam does it could only ever harm sales on their platform. Some people don’t seem to be bothered by the grip Valve has on the market however. Not like Microsoft wouldn’t do that either if they were in the same position because both are ultimately out there to make as much money as possible.
                ? Offline
                ? Offline
                Guest
                wrote last edited by
                #11
                Steam has the grip it has because nobody else is even trying to compete with them on like terms. Steam doesn’t engage in anti-competitive behavior and even shares their technology with competitors freely.
                misk@sopuli.xyzM 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • ? Guest
                  Steam has the grip it has because nobody else is even trying to compete with them on like terms. Steam doesn’t engage in anti-competitive behavior and even shares their technology with competitors freely.
                  misk@sopuli.xyzM This user is from outside of this forum
                  misk@sopuli.xyzM This user is from outside of this forum
                  misk@sopuli.xyz
                  wrote last edited by
                  #12
                  Are you saying that if there was another store that you could move all your games to, with 10% cut, 10% discount for you and 10% discount for the developer you wouldn’t use it because Steam is so good? Take a look at your games library and imagine 20% of what you paid not going to Valve. Do they really provide good value for that money?
                  ? 1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  0
                  • misk@sopuli.xyzM misk@sopuli.xyz
                    Are you saying that if there was another store that you could move all your games to, with 10% cut, 10% discount for you and 10% discount for the developer you wouldn’t use it because Steam is so good? Take a look at your games library and imagine 20% of what you paid not going to Valve. Do they really provide good value for that money?
                    ? Offline
                    ? Offline
                    Guest
                    wrote last edited by
                    #13
                    Publishers have their own storefronts and… surprise, not a single one charges 30% less due to avoiding the Steam tax. And yes, I frequently am willing to pay slightly more to keep things in Steam. It means easier Steam Deck access, family sharing, Steam Link, and other benefits that I would miss out on via other platforms, even if they were cheaper (which we established was not the case).
                    misk@sopuli.xyzM 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • ? Guest
                      Publishers have their own storefronts and… surprise, not a single one charges 30% less due to avoiding the Steam tax. And yes, I frequently am willing to pay slightly more to keep things in Steam. It means easier Steam Deck access, family sharing, Steam Link, and other benefits that I would miss out on via other platforms, even if they were cheaper (which we established was not the case).
                      misk@sopuli.xyzM This user is from outside of this forum
                      misk@sopuli.xyzM This user is from outside of this forum
                      misk@sopuli.xyz
                      wrote last edited by
                      #14
                      For me that comes up to a couple hundred euros, definitely not seeing where that goes. Someone said here that Valve doesn’t chase profit at all cost because they’re a private company. We’re talking about pioneers of enshittification though, look what they’ve done to Team Fortress 2 or Dota 2. They turned both into casinos for children, breaking cohesion and balance, just to chase the profits. Do you think those people run Steam ethically or with your interest in mind?
                      ? 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • misk@sopuli.xyzM misk@sopuli.xyz
                        For me that comes up to a couple hundred euros, definitely not seeing where that goes. Someone said here that Valve doesn’t chase profit at all cost because they’re a private company. We’re talking about pioneers of enshittification though, look what they’ve done to Team Fortress 2 or Dota 2. They turned both into casinos for children, breaking cohesion and balance, just to chase the profits. Do you think those people run Steam ethically or with your interest in mind?
                        ? Offline
                        ? Offline
                        Guest
                        wrote last edited by
                        #15
                        None of those are games for children. Or casinos. Are you trying to argue that selling cosmetics in games is inherently unethical?
                        misk@sopuli.xyzM 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • ? Guest
                          None of those are games for children. Or casinos. Are you trying to argue that selling cosmetics in games is inherently unethical?
                          misk@sopuli.xyzM This user is from outside of this forum
                          misk@sopuli.xyzM This user is from outside of this forum
                          misk@sopuli.xyz
                          wrote last edited by
                          #16
                          Selling cosmetics via loot boxes is gambling. They market their video games to children (all rated 13+). Way to twist what I’ve said lol. Goodbye, I’m blocking all Valve shills for sanity lately.
                          ? 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • misk@sopuli.xyzM misk@sopuli.xyz
                            This post did not contain any content.
                            ? Offline
                            ? Offline
                            Guest
                            wrote last edited by
                            #17
                            It's kind of satisfying to see Valve and SteamOS out so much pressure on Microsoft.
                            1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            0
                            • misk@sopuli.xyzM misk@sopuli.xyz
                              Selling cosmetics via loot boxes is gambling. They market their video games to children (all rated 13+). Way to twist what I’ve said lol. Goodbye, I’m blocking all Valve shills for sanity lately.
                              ? Offline
                              ? Offline
                              Guest
                              wrote last edited by
                              #18
                              why not be mad about the gumball machines full of random toys instead? is that not directly targeting kids with gambling?
                              misk@sopuli.xyzM 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • ? Guest
                                why not be mad about the gumball machines full of random toys instead? is that not directly targeting kids with gambling?
                                misk@sopuli.xyzM This user is from outside of this forum
                                misk@sopuli.xyzM This user is from outside of this forum
                                misk@sopuli.xyz
                                wrote last edited by
                                #19
                                I’m against all gambling, especially targeting kids. So yeah, we can get rid of gumball machines. Bad attempt at whataboutism because I’m no hypocrite.
                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0

                                Reply
                                • Reply as topic
                                Log in to reply
                                • Oldest to Newest
                                • Newest to Oldest
                                • Most Votes


                                • Login

                                • Don't have an account? Register

                                • Login or register to search.
                                Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Categories
                                • Recent
                                • Tags
                                • Popular
                                • World
                                • Users
                                • Groups