Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Chebucto Regional Softball Club

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. So apparently NodeBB includes a valid nodeinfo and even lists 'activitypub' in the protocols section, even for forums that don't federate πŸ€”
A forum for discussing and organizing recreational softball and baseball games and leagues in the greater Halifax area.

So apparently NodeBB includes a valid nodeinfo and even lists 'activitypub' in the protocols section, even for forums that don't federate πŸ€”

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
10 Posts 6 Posters 41 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • dansupD This user is from outside of this forum
    dansupD This user is from outside of this forum
    dansup
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    So apparently NodeBB includes a valid nodeinfo and even lists 'activitypub' in the protocols section, even for forums that don't federate πŸ€”

    Shoutout to @silverpill for creating a new Nodeinfo FEP to handle this

    jandiJ silverpillS Emelia πŸ‘ΈπŸ»T 3 Replies Last reply
    0
    • dansupD dansup

      So apparently NodeBB includes a valid nodeinfo and even lists 'activitypub' in the protocols section, even for forums that don't federate πŸ€”

      Shoutout to @silverpill for creating a new Nodeinfo FEP to handle this

      jandiJ This user is from outside of this forum
      jandiJ This user is from outside of this forum
      jandi
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      @dansup @silverpill Oh, that explains it! I was wondering where all those federated forums were and why I was hardly ever seeing anything from them in my timelines... Thanks.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • dansupD dansup

        So apparently NodeBB includes a valid nodeinfo and even lists 'activitypub' in the protocols section, even for forums that don't federate πŸ€”

        Shoutout to @silverpill for creating a new Nodeinfo FEP to handle this

        silverpillS This user is from outside of this forum
        silverpillS This user is from outside of this forum
        silverpill
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        @dansup Thanks!

        What would you recommend to implementers in this case?
        I know that some servers (e.g. Pleroma) use metadata.federation.enabled flag. Removing activitypub from protocols is also a good idea.

        cc @julian

        julianJ ? 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • silverpillS silverpill

          @dansup Thanks!

          What would you recommend to implementers in this case?
          I know that some servers (e.g. Pleroma) use metadata.federation.enabled flag. Removing activitypub from protocols is also a good idea.

          cc @julian

          julianJ This user is from outside of this forum
          julianJ This user is from outside of this forum
          julian
          wrote last edited by
          #4
          [silverpill@mitra.social](https://community.nodebb.org/user/silverpill%40mitra.social) [dansup@mastodon.social](https://community.nodebb.org/user/dansup%40mastodon.social) we'll reach out to the owners of the two top forums and suggest enabling federation. The FEP is also great, we'll be following along and implementing. Keep in mind federation can be turned on but no categories federate, so perhaps that case needs to be called out.
          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • ActivityPubA ActivityPub shared this topic
          • silverpillS silverpill

            @dansup Thanks!

            What would you recommend to implementers in this case?
            I know that some servers (e.g. Pleroma) use metadata.federation.enabled flag. Removing activitypub from protocols is also a good idea.

            cc @julian

            ? Offline
            ? Offline
            Guest
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            @silverpill @dansup @julian hm... technically federation is only the server-to-server part of the protocol. So there could be a case for advertising activitypub via nodeinfo but keeping the federation disabled. Don't know how useful that would be though.

            julianJ 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • ? Guest

              @silverpill @dansup @julian hm... technically federation is only the server-to-server part of the protocol. So there could be a case for advertising activitypub via nodeinfo but keeping the federation disabled. Don't know how useful that would be though.

              julianJ This user is from outside of this forum
              julianJ This user is from outside of this forum
              julian
              wrote last edited by
              #6
              [antolius@mastodon.social](https://community.nodebb.org/user/antolius%40mastodon.social) the thing here is that "x server federates" isn't a binary thing. We support quite fine grained privileges, and that extends to ActivityPub as well. So representing that state as a Boolean isn't quite right either.
              1 Reply Last reply
              1
              0
              • dansupD dansup

                So apparently NodeBB includes a valid nodeinfo and even lists 'activitypub' in the protocols section, even for forums that don't federate πŸ€”

                Shoutout to @silverpill for creating a new Nodeinfo FEP to handle this

                Emelia πŸ‘ΈπŸ»T This user is from outside of this forum
                Emelia πŸ‘ΈπŸ»T This user is from outside of this forum
                Emelia πŸ‘ΈπŸ»
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                @dansup @silverpill sounds like if a NodeBB instance isn't federating and isn't using activitypub, then it shouldn't list it in the protocols supported?

                cc @julian

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • Emelia πŸ‘ΈπŸ»T This user is from outside of this forum
                  Emelia πŸ‘ΈπŸ»T This user is from outside of this forum
                  Emelia πŸ‘ΈπŸ»
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8

                  @julian @antolius arguably, activitypub as a protocol in NodeInfo should be deprecated and in its place activitypub-s2s and activitypub-c2s should exist, since activitypub is two protocols in a trenchcoat

                  ? 1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  0
                  • Emelia πŸ‘ΈπŸ»T Emelia πŸ‘ΈπŸ»

                    @julian @antolius arguably, activitypub as a protocol in NodeInfo should be deprecated and in its place activitypub-s2s and activitypub-c2s should exist, since activitypub is two protocols in a trenchcoat

                    ? Offline
                    ? Offline
                    Guest
                    wrote last edited by
                    #9

                    @thisismissem @julian that seems like the cleanest solution. Would require migrating current implementations though. I don't know how big of a deal that is. We could probably treat the old activitypub value as the s2s variant in the meantime.

                    Emelia πŸ‘ΈπŸ»T 1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    0
                    • ? Guest

                      @thisismissem @julian that seems like the cleanest solution. Would require migrating current implementations though. I don't know how big of a deal that is. We could probably treat the old activitypub value as the s2s variant in the meantime.

                      Emelia πŸ‘ΈπŸ»T This user is from outside of this forum
                      Emelia πŸ‘ΈπŸ»T This user is from outside of this forum
                      Emelia πŸ‘ΈπŸ»
                      wrote last edited by
                      #10

                      @antolius @julian or just treat it as ambiguous?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0

                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups