I don't misunderstand your point, I reject it. When have we *ever* seen a government care more about taking care of its people than gaining power for its rulers? The more money and responsibility you give to a government, the more corrupt it becomes. That said, I do think something like UBI makes sense. Make it a simple cash pass-through where everyone is brought above the poverty line. I personally would prefer to structure it as a negative income tax, so you qualify if your income is below some amount, and everyone is brought between the poverty line and a "living wage" (say, 2X poverty line). It's equivalent to UBI, just with less sticker shock and a clearer paper trail (need to file a tax return). Look at the government shutdown, social security is still going out, I want NIT to be the same (and ideally replace SS). I say we replace all welfare programs with a UBI-type system. Charities would then exist to help people manage that money, get out of addictions, etc... If people are mistreated at work, they'll have the option of leaving. If a child is mistreated, child protection services (could be a charity) can move the child and those tax dollars to a better home. UBI would solve a ton of problems just by ensuring everyone has enough. If we touch billionaires' money, it should be with inheritance laws. I think we should tax all assets as if they were liquidated if they aren't donated to a qualifying charity. That's the biggest loophole I know about, and it should be closed.

That's a very specific and bold claim about Valve's internal finances. Do you have access to their private balance sheets and investment budgets? Unless you do, we're both just speculating. Factually speaking: Valve provides a massive, global storefront, handles all payment fraud and chargebacks, provides cloud storage for games, and maintains the entire friend/community network. The 30% is the price for that bundle of services. Whether that's a fair price is debatable, but the personal wealth of the CEO is a distraction from that debate.

$500 million that could have gone toward the development of Half Life 3...

Yes and before Steam the Publisher kept 60%, 30% is fine

That's Gabes money, not Valve's and you know it

Brother, go back and read the OP. You cannot claim that 30% is fair while the man camps on an Armada of yachts worth over a billion dollars. This is not a distraction, *this is the problem*. There's just no way that makes any sense.

Aren't it the devs who offer sales? Either way you just not buy something you don't need.

No, just less bad.

We're just at the point where "basically fine" is hands down better than the majority. Even if they were forced by regulation, they *followed* the regulations instead of ignoring them and fighting an insane court battle to nit pick it for the next decade. Like, valve doesn't seem to be trying to undermine democracy or somehow bring about an actively worse world. They seem to mostly obey the law and keep orderly as regulations change. If you said you wouldn't mind living Gabes life, I wouldn't think you're a sociopath. People saying that valve is great says a lot more about the rest of the companies than it does about valve, but it still leaves valve near the top of the pile.

Never stops being disgusting.

Pretty sure we're all wasting our lives serving capital in order to keep the obscene yachts on the seas. USA should be more honest and switch from GDP to GOYP.

This is the entire point of capitalism. The greatest system ever. Literally enslaving humanity and destroying the planet...

Lifetime of indoctrination into disgusting ideologies.

And how did she get a million? What does she teach?

International waters <--> pedos

Based gabe

Imagine believing this.

> While all that is indeed good, No it's just bullshit.

> If this money he is using to advance marine science He's not advancing anything but big boats polluting the planet.

100000%.