Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Chebucto Regional Softball Club

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. the whole ai-bro shtick about "ai democritizes art/programming/writing/etc" seemed always so bs to me, but i couldn't put it into words, but i think i now know how.
A forum for discussing and organizing recreational softball and baseball games and leagues in the greater Halifax area.

the whole ai-bro shtick about "ai democritizes art/programming/writing/etc" seemed always so bs to me, but i couldn't put it into words, but i think i now know how.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
83 Posts 38 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

    @lucydev

    I heard a guy say AI could "make art more diverse" and he had all these images of black elves and dwarfs. As if "lacking diversity" were just a surface issue not one built into who gets to participate, who has the time for creative expression.

    As if just pasting in a different colored face were the same thing as having an artist who wanted to draw that diversity and whose work would emerge from and be informed by the culture and experiences of the creator.

    2/

    P This user is from outside of this forum
    P This user is from outside of this forum
    Phosphenes
    wrote last edited by
    #74

    @futurebird @lucydev

    Well diverse as in robots get more representation now.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

      @lucydev

      These AI as equity arguments aren't coming from people who have ever said anything about "equity" before this moment, and they will never say anything about equity after this moment. They don't really care about equity. They just want to have something to say that might pause our criticism.

      "What if it really could help people?"

      Let that go. If it could help people you'd see people using AI effectively to help people.

      They are using it as cover.

      3/3

      Дими́трийS This user is from outside of this forum
      Дими́трийS This user is from outside of this forum
      Дими́трий
      wrote last edited by
      #75

      @futurebird

      what a brilliant and eloquent take. this is why i follow you. (this and ant facts)

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • 💀L 💀

        @miki yeah once you stop caring about wether or not your code runs optimal, or reliable, or does what it's actually supposed to, or can be maintained properly, you can surely be 20x productive, you'll just regret it afterwards at some point (or someone else who has to fix and maintain this mess will)

        ? Offline
        ? Offline
        Guest
        wrote last edited by
        #76

        @lucydev @miki

        "Move fast and break things" only makes sense if your plan is to sell a potempkin village to VC money and cash out before the false front crumbles.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

          @lucydev

          I heard a guy say AI could "make art more diverse" and he had all these images of black elves and dwarfs. As if "lacking diversity" were just a surface issue not one built into who gets to participate, who has the time for creative expression.

          As if just pasting in a different colored face were the same thing as having an artist who wanted to draw that diversity and whose work would emerge from and be informed by the culture and experiences of the creator.

          2/

          ? Offline
          ? Offline
          Guest
          wrote last edited by
          #77

          @futurebird
          That's such a wild take as well given how generative AI just strenghtens the lack of diversity in training data e.g. doctors will be men
          @lucydev

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • mikiM miki

            @lucydev @KatS I have very specifically said "unseen questions."

            If memorizing answers was a viable strategy to pass that test, humans would have done so.

            If you still believe that there's no possible use for a tool that can get gold on a never-before-used set of math olympiad question given a few hours of access to a reasonably powerful computer, and that the existence of that tool will have no interesting impact on the world... I don't know what to tell you.

            ? Offline
            ? Offline
            Guest
            wrote last edited by
            #78

            @miki
            But yes, it is certainly useful for a lot of things involving math olympiad questions. It certainly helps to come up with new ones for example. Just like chess computers are tremendously useful for chess players. Just that the market for all these artificial game-like tasks seems to be very limited compared to the investments & hype.
            @lucydev @KatS

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

              @lucydev

              I heard a guy say AI could "make art more diverse" and he had all these images of black elves and dwarfs. As if "lacking diversity" were just a surface issue not one built into who gets to participate, who has the time for creative expression.

              As if just pasting in a different colored face were the same thing as having an artist who wanted to draw that diversity and whose work would emerge from and be informed by the culture and experiences of the creator.

              2/

              Alex :yikes:A This user is from outside of this forum
              Alex :yikes:A This user is from outside of this forum
              Alex :yikes:
              wrote last edited by
              #79

              @futurebird not to mention the AI images would have been trained off of black fantasy artists already drawing those subjects. Having their own work used against them and never getting the compensation or recognition 😓

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

                @lucydev

                I heard a guy say AI could "make art more diverse" and he had all these images of black elves and dwarfs. As if "lacking diversity" were just a surface issue not one built into who gets to participate, who has the time for creative expression.

                As if just pasting in a different colored face were the same thing as having an artist who wanted to draw that diversity and whose work would emerge from and be informed by the culture and experiences of the creator.

                2/

                Eric LawtonE This user is from outside of this forum
                Eric LawtonE This user is from outside of this forum
                Eric Lawton
                wrote last edited by
                #80

                @futurebird

                I'm happy that the Oxford Dictionary of English still defines "art" as
                "the expression or application of human creative skill and imagination"

                IDK how long that will last because the dictionary definition is based on evaluating common usage and the marketing folks are trying hard to change that. We need that meaning as it is now.

                @lucydev

                #wordsMatter

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • 💀L 💀

                  the whole ai-bro shtick about "ai democritizes art/programming/writing/etc" seemed always so bs to me, but i couldn't put it into words, but i think i now know how.

                  ai didn't democritize any of these things. People did. The internet did. if all these things weren't democritized and freely available on the internet before, there wouldn't have been any training data available in the first place.

                  the one single amazing thing that today's day and age brought us is, that you can learn anything at any time for free at your own pace.

                  like, you can just sit down, and learn sketching, drawing, programming, writing, basics in electronics, pcb design, singing, instruments, whatever your heart desires and apply and practice these skills. fuck, most devs on fedi are self taught.

                  the most human thing there is is learning and creativity. the least human thing there is is trying to automate that away.

                  (not to mention said tech failing at it miserably)

                  ? Offline
                  ? Offline
                  Guest
                  wrote last edited by
                  #81

                  @lucydev it's even worse: in the AI world you're supposed to pay a subscription for the privilege of being able to exercise your creativity. Otherwise you're considered to be not serious, not productive enough, and will be kept outside the gate.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • 💀L 💀

                    the whole ai-bro shtick about "ai democritizes art/programming/writing/etc" seemed always so bs to me, but i couldn't put it into words, but i think i now know how.

                    ai didn't democritize any of these things. People did. The internet did. if all these things weren't democritized and freely available on the internet before, there wouldn't have been any training data available in the first place.

                    the one single amazing thing that today's day and age brought us is, that you can learn anything at any time for free at your own pace.

                    like, you can just sit down, and learn sketching, drawing, programming, writing, basics in electronics, pcb design, singing, instruments, whatever your heart desires and apply and practice these skills. fuck, most devs on fedi are self taught.

                    the most human thing there is is learning and creativity. the least human thing there is is trying to automate that away.

                    (not to mention said tech failing at it miserably)

                    ? Offline
                    ? Offline
                    Guest
                    wrote last edited by
                    #82

                    @lucydev Agreed. The idea offensively misunderstands not only human creativity, but also democracy. Democracy doesn't mean that skill and expertise don't matter.

                    Isaac Asimov has a famous quote: "There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there always has been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.'"

                    I think this same cultural failing is behind the belief that AI "democratizes" creativity.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • 💀L 💀

                      the whole ai-bro shtick about "ai democritizes art/programming/writing/etc" seemed always so bs to me, but i couldn't put it into words, but i think i now know how.

                      ai didn't democritize any of these things. People did. The internet did. if all these things weren't democritized and freely available on the internet before, there wouldn't have been any training data available in the first place.

                      the one single amazing thing that today's day and age brought us is, that you can learn anything at any time for free at your own pace.

                      like, you can just sit down, and learn sketching, drawing, programming, writing, basics in electronics, pcb design, singing, instruments, whatever your heart desires and apply and practice these skills. fuck, most devs on fedi are self taught.

                      the most human thing there is is learning and creativity. the least human thing there is is trying to automate that away.

                      (not to mention said tech failing at it miserably)

                      ? Offline
                      ? Offline
                      Guest
                      wrote last edited by
                      #83

                      @lucydev they say "democratize" when what they really mean is "I (personally) can produce amazing things without having to learn things like a chump"

                      It was just eating them up inside that they weren't instantly good at something on a level that other people would say yes you are good at this thing, so they decided to make that everyone's problem.

                      This whole techfeudalism thing is the result of bitter adult babies trying to gain their parents' respect

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0

                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • 1
                      • 2
                      • 3
                      • 4
                      • 5
                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups