In SP RPG games it's stupid. I'm just going to make however many trips back and forth it takes to empty the dungeon anyway. Might as well let me do it in one shot so I can get on to the next thing. I get it in survival crafting type games (within reason) but no reason games like skyrim or fallout need an encumbrance mechanic when you need a fuckload of stuff to level your crafting skills.

Stealing doors is easy, you just have to open it and then it becomes a jar. Jars are easier to carry away than doors.

Did reinstitution of the encoumbrance rules quell the door thieving, or just make them keep paperwork on it?

>part of why it has a cost is to be a sink for gold. Sure, it's not much, but it does add up. However, there are better ways to handle it than to track arrows. Magical arrow subscription service, never run out as long as your payments are up to date

Will you really go back? I suspect that 99.99% of players won't. It's more effective to go somewhere new, where you get XP, a fresh shot at better loot, and maybe different quests. Sure, you *can* ruin the economy in many ways, such as hoovering up every bit of loot. It isn't balanced around that though, and can't be. It's the correct assumption almost always that players won't return for loot that was left, because it's less valuable than doing a new dungeon.


Easy fix: Have more money as loot instead of otherwise nearly worthless items that sell for small amounts of money for flavor.

As a Door Thief, mildly. At a certain point encumbrance leads to a system of value density to prioritize overall loot carried; however loot goblins will also prioritize shenanigans such as stealing doorknobs or swapping doors or assigning high value to mundane items like stools for collection purposes. I think my next character will specialize in some sort of loot golem.

Always climb to the highest point in a dungeon to surveil it. Then gather up all you saw, use that saw to cut through the damn doors.

Battle is a fun time to discover your auto-renew didn't work and your arrows will now only shoot 3 feet before disappearing. ...wait I think I'm ready to DM

Yes, I go back. Why would I say it's annoying and wastes a ton of time if I didn't have experience with it? I've had a lot of conversations with other people who are the same way so I think you are underestimating how annoying it is. As far as moving on to the next place, what do you get? One boss chest, with a single magic item that may or may not be good for you? You still have to pick up the incedental crap to sell for gold and crafting materials. If you just rely on the few decent items you get that would take even longer. Regardless, there's no economy to ruin in games like skyrim or fallout. You're the only one there with a bunch of mindless NPCs, they don't trade with each other and their inventory resets after a few days. Selling them a ton of crap is completely meaningless to the world as a whole.

I have an invisible mage hand that can pick the keys out of the jailers pocket. If you want me to roll for collecting every arrow… I will One dice at a time

Well, for most games it isn't useless items. Most of it just isn't useful *to you*. Either your gear is better, or it's for a combat style you don't use, or it's consumables like potions.

I don't think you understand game design if you can't understand what's meant by "ruining the economy." It means that the player gets so much money that there's essentially no use for it anymore. They can buy anything that's available without concern. For example, in Morrowind you can craft potions with ridiculous value, then use that to pay for levels from trainers and buy the best items, then pay for enchanting to make them even better. It trivializes the game. The only option at that point is to just limit what can be purchased. That's a much worse solution than balancing the game's economy so the player has options to spend money on, but critically *they can't buy everything*. Video games are about making decisions. If you don't have to decide anything than why not just watch a movie? The game needs to present you with options, and you need to choose what you will and won't do. The economy is a great place this can happen in a game that's balanced well.

I'm talking about the things you can't use, like bowls and trinkets and other stuff that games frequently include as 'white' items that *literally* cannot be used. Those things that exist to be sold to vendors. They have been in many of the roga I have played. In the rpgs that don't have them, there isn't a vendor that buys stuff and no 'economy' that exists.

Bows are OP until you have limited arrows

That's almost exclusively a Bethesda thing, at least to the extent it's an issue. Technically it's in Tainted Grail some, and Larian games a very small amount, but never in enough quantity or weight to be an issue, nor are they ever worth enough to bother with.

I don't ask characters to keep track of ammunition, but if they are using a crossbow or some type of gun, I will absolutely penalize them for not remembering to reload between combat. Or forgetting to retrieve thrown weapons. Its just always funny in an evil sort of way. "I'm going to attack the troll!" "Alright, how do you want to attack?" "I'm going to throw my enchanted spear at it!" "Your spear is a level down, back where you last threw it when fighting those goblins earlier." *Shocked pickachu face*

Eh, didn't have better things to do at the time, and wanted to shout out MPMB's PDFs. Amazing tool.

 > Arrow! Black arrow! I have saved you to the last. You have never failed me and always I have recovered you. I had you from my father and he from of old. If ever you came from the forges of the true King under the Mountain, go now and speed well"