A forum for discussing and organizing recreational softball and baseball games and leagues in the greater Halifax area.
After GOTY pull, Clair Obscur devs draw line in sand over AI: 'Everything will be made by humans by us'
-
I mean, one of us is "defending" use of a technology that helps people, the other is publicly bashing their sister, implying she's stupid (which might or might not be true, not the point). I'll leave the conclusion to other readers, I have no more to say to a person like you.More-so I'm concerned for my sister, but yes, I did "publicly" bash her. On lemmy. Lol. The absurdity of your moral outrage is astounding. My sister is not above criticism because I care about her. But don't worry, you didn't raise any good points and you failed to deflect away from my poignant anecdote. The readers will indeed side against you, because you have failed to produce a sound argument.
-
Dude, go touch grass, please. This is embarrassing.
-
Oh, someone did read a Wikipedia article! No, it was not "appeal to popularity," it was meant to show that you'd be hard to find a product where at least small part wasn't generated with AI, meaning singling this company out because they admitted it is bullshit.
-
Yeah the AI slop hell that gives us terrible slop like expedition 33. Shudder at the thought
-
I wouldn't call it a genius either, it's just all over the place. Sometimes it's scary good and predicts your next move, most of the time it's just okay, sometimes it's annoyingly badMy last job was on a fairly large typescript codebase (few hundred Klocs) which we started some time before LLMs were a thing. While we weren't into academic engineering patterns and buzzwords, we were very particular in maintaining consistent patterns across the codebase. The output of Copilot, even with early models which were far from today's standards, was often scarily accurate. It was far from genius but i'm still chasing that high to this day, to me it really indicated that we had made this codebase readable and actionable even by a new hire.
-
But i was responding to a specific comment with well enough context to understand what i mean. If something's unclear about it you can ask about it in a non passive agressive way and maybe i can help you out.
-
When you sample in music, you get the original artist's permission or you get fucking sued. If the AI used were trained on a licensed library catalogue, then sure. Media companies historically would buy sample licenses to use for their sound effects in movies, video games, etc. so AI could essentially just do that, but put the encyclopedia of samples in a blender of training to modulate that shit to make something somewhat "new" to be used. Original artists get royalties, users get something customized without having to hire sounds engineers to make those adjustments, and consumers get good products.>When you sample in music, you get the original artist's permission or you get sued Not if it's short enough and is used in an otherwise entirely new work/remix.
-
You sound like a sane person. Here you go, a lie as you wished.
-
So, correcting your nonsense is "ad hominem" now, huh? Newsflash: If you're wrong and someone corrects you, it's not ad hominem. And what the hell is the nonsense about moving the goalpost? Do you read what you type or do you just tell an AI to write your comments for you?
-
So, correcting your nonsense is "ad hominem" now, huh? Newsflash: If you're wrong and someone corrects you, it's not ad hominem. And what the hell is the nonsense about moving the goalpost? Do you read what you type or do you just tell an AI to write your comments for you?
-
You sound like a sane person. Here you go, a lie as you wished.
