When all her friends and family see that image, she is definitely involved. And it's definitely abuse.

It used real images of shrek and the moon to do that. It didnt "invent" or "imagine" either. The child porn it's generating is based on literal child porn, if not itself just actual child porn.

You think these billion-dollar companies keep hyper-illegal images around, just to train their hideously expensive models to do the things they do not want those models to do?

Does a depiction of her corpse mean she's dead?

It literally can't combine unrelated concepts though. Not too long ago there was the issue where one (Dall-E?) couldn't make a picture of a full glass of wine because every glass of wine it had been trained on was half full, because that's generally how we prefer to photograph wine. It has no concept of "full" the way actual intelligences do, so it couldn't connect the dots. It had to be trained on actual full glasses of wine to gain the ability to produce them itself.

>steam >does nothing >wins

And you think it's short on images of fully naked women?

Guy atomically made of shit takes has another shit take, colour me surprised.

False equivalence.

The central goddamn point. *Depicting* things happening does not mean they *actually happened.* The entire point of the term CSAM is to describe crimes which literally occurred. It is material... from the sexual abuse... of children. Do y'all not understand why it's kinda fuckin' important to have a term for that specific concept?

Do you think that generated depictions of the sexual abuse of children are ok in any context?

No, I think these billion dollar companies are incredibly sloppy about curating the content they steal to train their systems on.

I think it's more a: "Guy who enjoys making child porn on xhitter gets angry when decent people want to ban it." type situation. If I see someone arguing for something then that's because they want it. Or want to use it.

Did he take an oath against common sense? Is he bound by a curse to have bad takes for his entire life? Does he ragebait as a living? What the actual fuck is up with this dude?

What a reprehensible, disingenuous representation of what he actually said. I'm not a fan of the guy, but PC Gamer is trash as well. Scary to see how people here are reacting just because it's about X and AI.

Man that title gives me a stroke trying to decipher it.. it almost reads like Tim Sweeney wants Twitter banned but clearly that’s not the case..

Literally this meme again 

What a weird thing to saw by the man whose company is 35% owned by the Chinese government. His argument, the words said and not implied, isn’t directly about csam, it’s about political censorship. Wonder how his Chinese overlords are taking that statement.

Absolutely insane take. The reason Grok can generate CP is because it was trained on it. Musk should be arrested just for owning that shit.

sweeney sounds like a pedo