It literally can't combine unrelated concepts though. Not too long ago there was the issue where one (Dall-E?) couldn't make a picture of a full glass of wine because every glass of wine it had been trained on was half full, because that's generally how we prefer to photograph wine. It has no concept of "full" the way actual intelligences do, so it couldn't connect the dots. It had to be trained on actual full glasses of wine to gain the ability to produce them itself.

Does a depiction of her corpse mean she's dead?

False equivalence.

The central goddamn point. *Depicting* things happening does not mean they *actually happened.* The entire point of the term CSAM is to describe crimes which literally occurred. It is material... from the sexual abuse... of children. Do y'all not understand why it's kinda fuckin' important to have a term for that specific concept?

You think these billion-dollar companies keep hyper-illegal images around, just to train their hideously expensive models to do the things they do not want those models to do?

Guy atomically made of shit takes has another shit take, colour me surprised.

Isn't this the "won't somebody please think of the children" party?

Man that title gives me a stroke trying to decipher it.. it almost reads like Tim Sweeney wants Twitter banned but clearly that’s not the case..

Literally this meme again