Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Chebucto Regional Softball Club

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. HELLDIVERS 2 Tech Blog #2 - Opt-in install size reduction beta (from 154Gb to 23Gb)
A forum for discussing and organizing recreational softball and baseball games and leagues in the greater Halifax area.

HELLDIVERS 2 Tech Blog #2 - Opt-in install size reduction beta (from 154Gb to 23Gb)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
games
87 Posts 50 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • inlandempire@jlai.luI This user is from outside of this forum
    inlandempire@jlai.luI This user is from outside of this forum
    inlandempire@jlai.lu
    wrote last edited by
    #1
    *We have followed through on our plans and made small reductions in the PC installation size over the last few patches while still adding new content. While this was a good start, our short term fixes have not been enough to keep up with all of the new content in the latest patch. The longer term goal has always been to bring the PC installation size much closer in line with the console versions. We are happy to report that, thanks to our partners at Nixxes, we have reached that goal much sooner than expected._ _By completely de-duplicating our data, we were able to reduce the PC installation size from ~154GB to ~23GB, for a total saving of ~131GB (~85%). We have completed several rounds of internal QA and are ready to roll this out to early adopters as a public technical beta. Our testing shows that for the small percentage of players still using mechanical hard disk drives, mission loading times have only increased by a few seconds in the worst cases. This is live NOW!*_
    C ? R ? ? 16 Replies Last reply
    1
    0
    • GamesG Games shared this topic
    • inlandempire@jlai.luI inlandempire@jlai.lu
      *We have followed through on our plans and made small reductions in the PC installation size over the last few patches while still adding new content. While this was a good start, our short term fixes have not been enough to keep up with all of the new content in the latest patch. The longer term goal has always been to bring the PC installation size much closer in line with the console versions. We are happy to report that, thanks to our partners at Nixxes, we have reached that goal much sooner than expected._ _By completely de-duplicating our data, we were able to reduce the PC installation size from ~154GB to ~23GB, for a total saving of ~131GB (~85%). We have completed several rounds of internal QA and are ready to roll this out to early adopters as a public technical beta. Our testing shows that for the small percentage of players still using mechanical hard disk drives, mission loading times have only increased by a few seconds in the worst cases. This is live NOW!*_
      C This user is from outside of this forum
      C This user is from outside of this forum
      carpelbridgesyndrome@sh.itjust.works
      wrote last edited by
      #2
      > Modders beware! Any patch we roll out can break the game if you have mods installed and this one is no exception. We recommend that only players with a clean installation opt-in to the slim version. As always, you mod the game at your own risk. Huh. This game has anticheat do they want you modding or not? Also I was not aware there were mods.
      L ? ? ? ? 5 Replies Last reply
      0
      • C carpelbridgesyndrome@sh.itjust.works
        > Modders beware! Any patch we roll out can break the game if you have mods installed and this one is no exception. We recommend that only players with a clean installation opt-in to the slim version. As always, you mod the game at your own risk. Huh. This game has anticheat do they want you modding or not? Also I was not aware there were mods.
        L This user is from outside of this forum
        L This user is from outside of this forum
        laserturboshark69@sh.itjust.works
        wrote last edited by
        #3
        As far as I know, they have been cool about client side mods like armor skins and textures but obviously they're not cool with you giving your account a bunch of the premium currency
        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • C carpelbridgesyndrome@sh.itjust.works
          > Modders beware! Any patch we roll out can break the game if you have mods installed and this one is no exception. We recommend that only players with a clean installation opt-in to the slim version. As always, you mod the game at your own risk. Huh. This game has anticheat do they want you modding or not? Also I was not aware there were mods.
          ? Offline
          ? Offline
          Guest
          wrote last edited by
          #4
          At least on nexus it’s all cosmetic as mods cannot add content It’s how you got halo weapons before the warbond in the form of reskinned liberators. I also had one that was a railgun overcharge sounds, if the gun was fully charged it would go *boop boop boop*. There’s some that gives the b01 default armor cat ears. Some friends who are more courageous and/or undemocratic than me who have turned the adult filter off have reported some interesting armor and enemy reskins
          ? 1 Reply Last reply
          1
          0
          • inlandempire@jlai.luI inlandempire@jlai.lu
            *We have followed through on our plans and made small reductions in the PC installation size over the last few patches while still adding new content. While this was a good start, our short term fixes have not been enough to keep up with all of the new content in the latest patch. The longer term goal has always been to bring the PC installation size much closer in line with the console versions. We are happy to report that, thanks to our partners at Nixxes, we have reached that goal much sooner than expected._ _By completely de-duplicating our data, we were able to reduce the PC installation size from ~154GB to ~23GB, for a total saving of ~131GB (~85%). We have completed several rounds of internal QA and are ready to roll this out to early adopters as a public technical beta. Our testing shows that for the small percentage of players still using mechanical hard disk drives, mission loading times have only increased by a few seconds in the worst cases. This is live NOW!*_
            ? Offline
            ? Offline
            Guest
            wrote last edited by
            #5
            > We have...made **small reductions** in the PC installation size > we were able to reduce the PC installation size by 85% hhhhhwat...?
            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            0
            • inlandempire@jlai.luI inlandempire@jlai.lu
              *We have followed through on our plans and made small reductions in the PC installation size over the last few patches while still adding new content. While this was a good start, our short term fixes have not been enough to keep up with all of the new content in the latest patch. The longer term goal has always been to bring the PC installation size much closer in line with the console versions. We are happy to report that, thanks to our partners at Nixxes, we have reached that goal much sooner than expected._ _By completely de-duplicating our data, we were able to reduce the PC installation size from ~154GB to ~23GB, for a total saving of ~131GB (~85%). We have completed several rounds of internal QA and are ready to roll this out to early adopters as a public technical beta. Our testing shows that for the small percentage of players still using mechanical hard disk drives, mission loading times have only increased by a few seconds in the worst cases. This is live NOW!*_
              R This user is from outside of this forum
              R This user is from outside of this forum
              righthandofikaros@lemmy.world
              wrote last edited by
              #6
              Whenever they first said they were using data duplication, I said that modern hardware doesn't benefit from that anymore. It used to work like that on old hardware and consoles, but not anymore. Glad they finally learned.
              1 Reply Last reply
              1
              0
              • inlandempire@jlai.luI inlandempire@jlai.lu
                *We have followed through on our plans and made small reductions in the PC installation size over the last few patches while still adding new content. While this was a good start, our short term fixes have not been enough to keep up with all of the new content in the latest patch. The longer term goal has always been to bring the PC installation size much closer in line with the console versions. We are happy to report that, thanks to our partners at Nixxes, we have reached that goal much sooner than expected._ _By completely de-duplicating our data, we were able to reduce the PC installation size from ~154GB to ~23GB, for a total saving of ~131GB (~85%). We have completed several rounds of internal QA and are ready to roll this out to early adopters as a public technical beta. Our testing shows that for the small percentage of players still using mechanical hard disk drives, mission loading times have only increased by a few seconds in the worst cases. This is live NOW!*_
                ? Offline
                ? Offline
                Guest
                wrote last edited by
                #7
                - loads more slowly on HDD - now small enough for your SSD
                ? 1 Reply Last reply
                1
                0
                • inlandempire@jlai.luI inlandempire@jlai.lu
                  *We have followed through on our plans and made small reductions in the PC installation size over the last few patches while still adding new content. While this was a good start, our short term fixes have not been enough to keep up with all of the new content in the latest patch. The longer term goal has always been to bring the PC installation size much closer in line with the console versions. We are happy to report that, thanks to our partners at Nixxes, we have reached that goal much sooner than expected._ _By completely de-duplicating our data, we were able to reduce the PC installation size from ~154GB to ~23GB, for a total saving of ~131GB (~85%). We have completed several rounds of internal QA and are ready to roll this out to early adopters as a public technical beta. Our testing shows that for the small percentage of players still using mechanical hard disk drives, mission loading times have only increased by a few seconds in the worst cases. This is live NOW!*_
                  ? Offline
                  ? Offline
                  Guest
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8
                  This vibes like that scene in Dumb and Dumber where Harry is standing next to a fire complaining that his fingers are about to fall off, and Lloyd says "you should take these extra gloves. Mine are getting sweaty". This game currently consumes 30% of the hard drive on my main PC. I'm impressed by the technical feat, but am also annoyed that they knew they were wasting this much space and simply did not care. I'm betting every 100GB game is like this.
                  fishos@lemmy.worldF F 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • inlandempire@jlai.luI inlandempire@jlai.lu
                    *We have followed through on our plans and made small reductions in the PC installation size over the last few patches while still adding new content. While this was a good start, our short term fixes have not been enough to keep up with all of the new content in the latest patch. The longer term goal has always been to bring the PC installation size much closer in line with the console versions. We are happy to report that, thanks to our partners at Nixxes, we have reached that goal much sooner than expected._ _By completely de-duplicating our data, we were able to reduce the PC installation size from ~154GB to ~23GB, for a total saving of ~131GB (~85%). We have completed several rounds of internal QA and are ready to roll this out to early adopters as a public technical beta. Our testing shows that for the small percentage of players still using mechanical hard disk drives, mission loading times have only increased by a few seconds in the worst cases. This is live NOW!*_
                    ? Offline
                    ? Offline
                    Guest
                    wrote last edited by
                    #9
                    Anyone find anything nefarious in the EULA after this update?
                    1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    0
                    • ? Guest
                      This vibes like that scene in Dumb and Dumber where Harry is standing next to a fire complaining that his fingers are about to fall off, and Lloyd says "you should take these extra gloves. Mine are getting sweaty". This game currently consumes 30% of the hard drive on my main PC. I'm impressed by the technical feat, but am also annoyed that they knew they were wasting this much space and simply did not care. I'm betting every 100GB game is like this.
                      fishos@lemmy.worldF This user is from outside of this forum
                      fishos@lemmy.worldF This user is from outside of this forum
                      fishos@lemmy.world
                      wrote last edited by
                      #10
                      It's 2025. If all you have is a 400GB hd, that's a you problem. Sure, that was a big number over a decade ago, but that number is nothing now. Same energy as complaining that it takes too many floppy drives to store your files. Like you think it makes it sound like a huge number when you phrase it as 30% and all it shows is you have an outdated rig and are mad that progress moved on without you.
                      ? ? nighed@feddit.ukN ? B 5 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • fishos@lemmy.worldF fishos@lemmy.world
                        It's 2025. If all you have is a 400GB hd, that's a you problem. Sure, that was a big number over a decade ago, but that number is nothing now. Same energy as complaining that it takes too many floppy drives to store your files. Like you think it makes it sound like a huge number when you phrase it as 30% and all it shows is you have an outdated rig and are mad that progress moved on without you.
                        ? Offline
                        ? Offline
                        Guest
                        wrote last edited by
                        #11
                        Duplicating the data many times over isn't progress.
                        fishos@lemmy.worldF 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • ? Guest
                          Duplicating the data many times over isn't progress.
                          fishos@lemmy.worldF This user is from outside of this forum
                          fishos@lemmy.worldF This user is from outside of this forum
                          fishos@lemmy.world
                          wrote last edited by
                          #12
                          It was for HDDs, literally helping you people who refuse to advance. It was progress in the sense that it allowed you to play on your outdated system. They could have just told you to fuck off from the get go.
                          S 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • inlandempire@jlai.luI inlandempire@jlai.lu
                            *We have followed through on our plans and made small reductions in the PC installation size over the last few patches while still adding new content. While this was a good start, our short term fixes have not been enough to keep up with all of the new content in the latest patch. The longer term goal has always been to bring the PC installation size much closer in line with the console versions. We are happy to report that, thanks to our partners at Nixxes, we have reached that goal much sooner than expected._ _By completely de-duplicating our data, we were able to reduce the PC installation size from ~154GB to ~23GB, for a total saving of ~131GB (~85%). We have completed several rounds of internal QA and are ready to roll this out to early adopters as a public technical beta. Our testing shows that for the small percentage of players still using mechanical hard disk drives, mission loading times have only increased by a few seconds in the worst cases. This is live NOW!*_
                            blackmist@feddit.ukB This user is from outside of this forum
                            blackmist@feddit.ukB This user is from outside of this forum
                            blackmist@feddit.uk
                            wrote last edited by
                            #13
                            If you're still using HDD for games in 2025 then what the fuck are you even playing at? Even the consoles abandoned that.
                            ? ? 2 Replies Last reply
                            1
                            0
                            • C carpelbridgesyndrome@sh.itjust.works
                              > Modders beware! Any patch we roll out can break the game if you have mods installed and this one is no exception. We recommend that only players with a clean installation opt-in to the slim version. As always, you mod the game at your own risk. Huh. This game has anticheat do they want you modding or not? Also I was not aware there were mods.
                              ? Offline
                              ? Offline
                              Guest
                              wrote last edited by
                              #14
                              It's because it has mmo-like mechanics. They said it's because they don't want someone to cheat and ruin things like global orders to free a planet. Ex: someone can cheat and clear missions *wayyy* faster and overly contribute to if a planet tbat the entire community is working towards liberating from the filthy Terminids.
                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • inlandempire@jlai.luI inlandempire@jlai.lu
                                *We have followed through on our plans and made small reductions in the PC installation size over the last few patches while still adding new content. While this was a good start, our short term fixes have not been enough to keep up with all of the new content in the latest patch. The longer term goal has always been to bring the PC installation size much closer in line with the console versions. We are happy to report that, thanks to our partners at Nixxes, we have reached that goal much sooner than expected._ _By completely de-duplicating our data, we were able to reduce the PC installation size from ~154GB to ~23GB, for a total saving of ~131GB (~85%). We have completed several rounds of internal QA and are ready to roll this out to early adopters as a public technical beta. Our testing shows that for the small percentage of players still using mechanical hard disk drives, mission loading times have only increased by a few seconds in the worst cases. This is live NOW!*_
                                ? Offline
                                ? Offline
                                Guest
                                wrote last edited by
                                #15
                                The fact that they were using 5-6x more space than required in the first place is pretty infuriating.
                                ? F kazerniel@lemmy.worldK 3 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • inlandempire@jlai.luI inlandempire@jlai.lu
                                  *We have followed through on our plans and made small reductions in the PC installation size over the last few patches while still adding new content. While this was a good start, our short term fixes have not been enough to keep up with all of the new content in the latest patch. The longer term goal has always been to bring the PC installation size much closer in line with the console versions. We are happy to report that, thanks to our partners at Nixxes, we have reached that goal much sooner than expected._ _By completely de-duplicating our data, we were able to reduce the PC installation size from ~154GB to ~23GB, for a total saving of ~131GB (~85%). We have completed several rounds of internal QA and are ready to roll this out to early adopters as a public technical beta. Our testing shows that for the small percentage of players still using mechanical hard disk drives, mission loading times have only increased by a few seconds in the worst cases. This is live NOW!*_
                                  ? Offline
                                  ? Offline
                                  Guest
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #16
                                  Great for steam deck users
                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • fishos@lemmy.worldF fishos@lemmy.world
                                    It's 2025. If all you have is a 400GB hd, that's a you problem. Sure, that was a big number over a decade ago, but that number is nothing now. Same energy as complaining that it takes too many floppy drives to store your files. Like you think it makes it sound like a huge number when you phrase it as 30% and all it shows is you have an outdated rig and are mad that progress moved on without you.
                                    ? Offline
                                    ? Offline
                                    Guest
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #17
                                    No the issue isn't with the user having a 400GB drive. The issue is the devs chose to leave 131GB of unnecessary duplication in the game artifacts when published. That is a fundamental problem with software in general but games especially. Blaming the customer for expecting to have a decent product is laughably misplaced. Part of software being a decent product is it being optimized. This was an absolute failure and they should really be putting out an apology instead of patting themselves on the back. It's great the game is so much smaller now but it should have been this new size at launch. Certainly not 131GB bigger than it needed to be.
                                    fishos@lemmy.worldF ? 2 Replies Last reply
                                    0
                                    • C carpelbridgesyndrome@sh.itjust.works
                                      > Modders beware! Any patch we roll out can break the game if you have mods installed and this one is no exception. We recommend that only players with a clean installation opt-in to the slim version. As always, you mod the game at your own risk. Huh. This game has anticheat do they want you modding or not? Also I was not aware there were mods.
                                      ? Offline
                                      ? Offline
                                      Guest
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #18
                                      Asset swap mods are fine
                                      ? 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • ? Guest
                                        No the issue isn't with the user having a 400GB drive. The issue is the devs chose to leave 131GB of unnecessary duplication in the game artifacts when published. That is a fundamental problem with software in general but games especially. Blaming the customer for expecting to have a decent product is laughably misplaced. Part of software being a decent product is it being optimized. This was an absolute failure and they should really be putting out an apology instead of patting themselves on the back. It's great the game is so much smaller now but it should have been this new size at launch. Certainly not 131GB bigger than it needed to be.
                                        fishos@lemmy.worldF This user is from outside of this forum
                                        fishos@lemmy.worldF This user is from outside of this forum
                                        fishos@lemmy.world
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #19
                                        Cool, wanna go through the list of modern games and see their file sizes? COD is somewhere around 300GB. Anything AAA is usually 80-100gb. If all you have is a system capable of playing indie games, don't shit on those of use who actually put effort into our hobby. A 1tb SSD is ~$90. It's not some crazy ask. If you can't do that, fine. But don't drag the rest of us down with you.
                                        ? ? ? 3 Replies Last reply
                                        0
                                        • fishos@lemmy.worldF fishos@lemmy.world
                                          Cool, wanna go through the list of modern games and see their file sizes? COD is somewhere around 300GB. Anything AAA is usually 80-100gb. If all you have is a system capable of playing indie games, don't shit on those of use who actually put effort into our hobby. A 1tb SSD is ~$90. It's not some crazy ask. If you can't do that, fine. But don't drag the rest of us down with you.
                                          ? Offline
                                          ? Offline
                                          Guest
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #20
                                          Bruh, this is a crazy, defensive rant. You're defending multi-million dollar companies who are bad at their jobs and blaming the consumer who is getting poorer and poorer every year. Using COD as an example for normal, a famously repetitive franchise game whose developer is corpo as hell is not a good look. How many people at that studio are getting paid a good wage even relative to industry standard and not suffering burnout and other bad practices. Helldiver's just proved that A) you can have something like 6x bloat for no reason which they themselves say will hardly impact HDDs B) this is largely technical incompetence as they vetted their initial assumptions and found them flawed. This isn't about them supporting HDD's, they said they'll barely be impacted. This is about a developer not knowing what they need to do to make a successful game and slowly figuring out what is unnecessary. If COD cared, they could lower it too.
                                          fishos@lemmy.worldF 1 Reply Last reply
                                          1
                                          0

                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • 1
                                          • 2
                                          • 3
                                          • 4
                                          • 5
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups