Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Chebucto Regional Softball Club

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Tim Sweeney doesn't hold back: if you think the Epic Games launcher is bad, it's because it is
A forum for discussing and organizing recreational softball and baseball games and leagues in the greater Halifax area.

Tim Sweeney doesn't hold back: if you think the Epic Games launcher is bad, it's because it is

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
games
68 Posts 36 Posters 98 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ? Guest
    Bit barebones reporting. Here's an article that at least quotes portions of the interview: https://wccftech.com/epic-games-launcher-is-indeed-clunky-admits-epics-tim-sweeney/ I can only partially empathize with the argument that Steam is better because of 15 years of refinement. Yes, they have a big featureset, amazing APIs, developer kit, the workshop, the list goes on. There are a lot of technical challenges here. However, what cannot be excused with this argument is the Epic Launcher UX being this clunky, lmao. Yes, making a bunch of UI is nontrivial and takes work, but its also not rocket science. The layered and staggered loading of different UI elements and overal slowness of the whole thing cannot be explained by the lifespan of Epic Launcher. Steam was just as responsive on my old Windows XP back in the day as it is now. Throw something like Dear ImGui at a bunch of juniors and they could make something that is snappier than what the Epic Launcher is now. Google made a bunch of useful metrics called [Core Web Vitals](https://developers.google.com/search/docs/appearance/core-web-vitals) that represent responsiveness pretty well. I'm sure they would score awfully on all of them.
    ? Offline
    ? Offline
    Guest
    wrote last edited by
    #49
    There is no chance you can make a consumer-facing product using imgui. The closest to that I've seen is imhex, which admittedly is way better looking than I thought was possible with imgui. But it is a tool for mainly developers, not a consumer-facing product.
    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • nanoufo@sh.itjust.worksN nanoufo@sh.itjust.works
      This post did not contain any content.
      ? Offline
      ? Offline
      Guest
      wrote last edited by
      #50
      I know it’s popular to hate on Epic because of the whole exclusives thing and… well, that’s fair. But people don’t talk enough about how awful the whole package is. They need to burn it to the ground and start over. From scratch. Building the EGS software in UE was their first mistake. And it’s a big, ugly “using a hammer on screws” tier mistake. You want people to not hate you and use your stuff? First, make sure your stuff isn’t terrible. Make sure it’s good. Make sure it does valuable things your competitors don’t. Second, don’t be jerks and try to force people into your awful ecosystem using coercive strategies like exclusivity. Fix it, Sweeny. Until you fix it, nobody wants to hear what you have to say about it. We don’t want talk, we want results.
      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      0
      • ? Guest
        Somehow it takes even longer to launch than the Steam launcher.
        ? Offline
        ? Offline
        Guest
        wrote last edited by
        #51
        Because EGS is literally built in Unreal Engine. Instead of a normal desktop app, they built it in Unreal Engine. Yeah. Seriously.
        ? 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • skullgrid@lemmy.worldS skullgrid@lemmy.world
          Yeah, sure. Epic recieved 5% of basically 90% of games being released from about 2003 to fuck knows when.
          ? Offline
          ? Offline
          Guest
          wrote last edited by
          #52
          Yeah, for building most of those games. Valve has recieved 30% for doing fuck all. Why are you so adamantly defending them?
          skullgrid@lemmy.worldS ? 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • ? Guest
            Because EGS is literally built in Unreal Engine. Instead of a normal desktop app, they built it in Unreal Engine. Yeah. Seriously.
            ? Offline
            ? Offline
            Guest
            wrote last edited by
            #53
            That explains a lot. Except my computer is pretty top tier and even full games manage to launch faster than Epic Games Launcher
            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • ? Guest
              There is no chance you can make a consumer-facing product using imgui. The closest to that I've seen is imhex, which admittedly is way better looking than I thought was possible with imgui. But it is a tool for mainly developers, not a consumer-facing product.
              ? Offline
              ? Offline
              Guest
              wrote last edited by
              #54
              Haha yeah you definitely don't want to do that. It was meant as a slightly ridiculous hypothetical. There are definitely better suited UI libraries it there.
              1 Reply Last reply
              1
              0
              • ? Guest
                Yeah, for building most of those games. Valve has recieved 30% for doing fuck all. Why are you so adamantly defending them?
                skullgrid@lemmy.worldS This user is from outside of this forum
                skullgrid@lemmy.worldS This user is from outside of this forum
                skullgrid@lemmy.world
                wrote last edited by
                #55
                > for building most of those games providing an engine does not build the game. >Valve has recieved 30% for doing fuck all. Why are you so adamantly defending them? I'm not defending valve, I'm attacking epic
                ? 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • nanoufo@sh.itjust.worksN nanoufo@sh.itjust.works
                  This post did not contain any content.
                  ? Offline
                  ? Offline
                  Guest
                  wrote last edited by
                  #56
                  Not a fan of exclusives and every company having a launcher, but I could work with it if they didn’t require the launcher to confirm the licensing. So they’ve broken it in a way that forces you to use their shitty launcher, which just highlights how bad it is. People can forgive a degree of shittiness, until they’re forced to use your shitty product.
                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • ? Guest
                    And Steam. You just have to be picky. Even GOG sometimes lets a game with it's own DRM slip. https://www.pcgamingwiki.com/wiki/The_Big_List_of_DRM-Free_Games_on_Steam
                    ? Offline
                    ? Offline
                    Guest
                    wrote last edited by
                    #57
                    This seems a bit like missing the forest for the trees. Steam does not really let you know if the game is DRM-free, does not guarantee it will stay that way, and does not provide a reliable way to back these games up in a way where they could be used without the launcher.
                    ? 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • skullgrid@lemmy.worldS skullgrid@lemmy.world
                      > for building most of those games providing an engine does not build the game. >Valve has recieved 30% for doing fuck all. Why are you so adamantly defending them? I'm not defending valve, I'm attacking epic
                      ? Offline
                      ? Offline
                      Guest
                      wrote last edited by
                      #58
                      >for building most of those games >>providing an engine does not build the game. Well good thing I said "most" of a game. Go ahead and write your game logic and then tell me how you get it to render graphics on a screen without any engine code. >Valve has recieved 30% for doing fuck all. Why are you so adamantly defending them? >>I'm not defending valve, I'm attacking epic Yeah, in the context of a discussion about whether or not Valve is overcharging customers. Jesus Christ, keep up.
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • nanoufo@sh.itjust.worksN nanoufo@sh.itjust.works
                        This post did not contain any content.
                        ? Offline
                        ? Offline
                        Guest
                        wrote last edited by
                        #59
                        Who the fuck cares what a man baby who tried to make PC gaming worse for all of us thinks? Fuck this punk, FUCK the epic “store”, can’t wait until that POS goes down in flames and all the “it’s just a free game bro” people get their info sold to advertisers.
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        0
                        • S sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                          Eh, I have repurchased some games on Steam after getting them free from Epic. I rarely play them, but sometimes it's fun to dig through and find something I claimed. It takes like 30 sec on the web, so I do it when I'm in a meeting or something. > I have to re-login every time Really? I don't. Maybe that's why I've bothered claiming them nearly every week. I just open the web page, click the free game, then check out. New games drop every Thursday at 9AM PST, so it's easy to remember. I WFH Thursday and Friday, so it's easy to remember to claim it in the morning. But honestly, any day of the week works since it's one drop per week. It's more frequent during their Christmas sale, and I always forget when it starts, and I don't care enough to figure it out. So around Christmas, I check the next drop date and when it says the next day, I go on every day.
                          ? Offline
                          ? Offline
                          Guest
                          wrote last edited by
                          #60
                          Yeah, the session token expiry time seems to be something really short. In comparison, Steam has asked me to re-login like 3 times over the last 7 or 8 years I've used it (I used to be an active hater and only had it for HL2 and claiming the free games like Portal).
                          1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          0
                          • ? Guest
                            This seems a bit like missing the forest for the trees. Steam does not really let you know if the game is DRM-free, does not guarantee it will stay that way, and does not provide a reliable way to back these games up in a way where they could be used without the launcher.
                            ? Offline
                            ? Offline
                            Guest
                            wrote last edited by
                            #61
                            Supporting DRM-free games is key either way, but being fair there's A LOT of work to be done to make it more accessible. GOG's installers for instance are not better than compressing a game's files yourself. Certainly hope they're working on better installers. If it was in my hand I'd have them employ someone who makes game repacks. Anyway, I'll take a peek and push for Steam to tag games as DRM-free when they are.
                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • ? Guest
                              Yeah, for building most of those games. Valve has recieved 30% for doing fuck all. Why are you so adamantly defending them?
                              ? Offline
                              ? Offline
                              Guest
                              wrote last edited by
                              #62
                              Valve literally hosts petabytes of game data and allows any user to download them at any time. That's not nothing, data storage is very expensive, and users are charged nothing for it. They provide a service to not only the customers, but also the developers. Steam has so many backend features that allow devs to skip so many networking steps that can otherwise be a huge nightmare. Not sure why you think they are literally just a webpage that has a purchase button next to a game.
                              ? 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • ? Guest
                                Valve literally hosts petabytes of game data and allows any user to download them at any time. That's not nothing, data storage is very expensive, and users are charged nothing for it. They provide a service to not only the customers, but also the developers. Steam has so many backend features that allow devs to skip so many networking steps that can otherwise be a huge nightmare. Not sure why you think they are literally just a webpage that has a purchase button next to a game.
                                ? Offline
                                ? Offline
                                Guest
                                wrote last edited by
                                #63
                                >Valve literally hosts petabytes of game data and allows any user to download them at any time. That's not nothing, data storage is No, it's really not. Azure and AWS storage is dirt cheap, especially if it's cold storage and you can have a second or two delay when retrieving the file. If it was expensive, they wouldn't be the most profitable tech company per employee. >Steam has so many backend features that allow devs to skip so many networking steps that can otherwise be a huge nightmare. No, it doesn't. It provides a small handful of APIs around friends and matchmaking, which Xbox and Epic also provide for half the fees, in addition to the generic Azure and AWS versions. >Not sure why you think they are literally just a webpage that has a purchase button next to a game. I'm a software engineer whos built an app store before and has built 3d rendering engines. I know exactly how little work it took Valve to build Steam and how much work it took Epic to build Unreal. They are not remotely comparable.
                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • ? Guest
                                  Maybe it's just me but I can't recall any occasion where Valve said "hey devs, here's a pile of money but you're not allowed to sell your game outside Steam", have any examples in mind?
                                  ? Offline
                                  ? Offline
                                  Guest
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #64
                                  Valve purchased the rights to Counter-Strike in 2000, transitioning it from a community-made mod to a retail product. Similarly, Day of Defeat, initially a third-party Half-Life modification, was acquired by Valve, leading to a standalone retail release in 2003. In the case of Dota, Valve hired the mod’s lead developer and secured the intellectual property rights, culminating in the release of Dota 2 in 2013. These games remain exclusive to Steam.
                                  ? 1 Reply Last reply
                                  1
                                  0
                                  • ? Guest
                                    They fund games so who cares if they keep losing user information
                                    ? Offline
                                    ? Offline
                                    Guest
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #65
                                    That’s obviously bad. My comment was in response to the comment above about exclusives.
                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    0
                                    • ? Guest
                                      Valve purchased the rights to Counter-Strike in 2000, transitioning it from a community-made mod to a retail product. Similarly, Day of Defeat, initially a third-party Half-Life modification, was acquired by Valve, leading to a standalone retail release in 2003. In the case of Dota, Valve hired the mod’s lead developer and secured the intellectual property rights, culminating in the release of Dota 2 in 2013. These games remain exclusive to Steam.
                                      ? Offline
                                      ? Offline
                                      Guest
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #66
                                      These are all Valve not selling their own games outside Steam, their own storefront. Does Epic sell Fortnite anywhere else? Metro Exodus' publisher is Deep Silver. Epic, a storefront, paid through the nose to get exclusivity on distributing someone else's product. At the last minute. They are not the same.
                                      ? 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • ? Guest
                                        These are all Valve not selling their own games outside Steam, their own storefront. Does Epic sell Fortnite anywhere else? Metro Exodus' publisher is Deep Silver. Epic, a storefront, paid through the nose to get exclusivity on distributing someone else's product. At the last minute. They are not the same.
                                        ? Offline
                                        ? Offline
                                        Guest
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #67
                                        What is the distinction for the player? Both Counter-Strike and Control were funded by Valve and Epic, respectively. Both ended up with exclusivity. To the player, what different do the intro logos make? It sounds like you’re trying to win by technicality.
                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        1
                                        0
                                        • nanoufo@sh.itjust.worksN nanoufo@sh.itjust.works
                                          This post did not contain any content.
                                          ? Offline
                                          ? Offline
                                          Guest
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #68
                                          ![20250518_182654](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/a7733f57-e94d-487d-bd46-22e3ad921dac.jpeg)
                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • 1
                                          • 2
                                          • 3
                                          • 4
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups