Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Chebucto Regional Softball Club

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Is there a name for when someone thinks they are really bad at something (for example math) and they have learned not to trust their own intuition at all so they make really wild errors by second guessing themselves?
A forum for discussing and organizing recreational softball and baseball games and leagues in the greater Halifax area.

Is there a name for when someone thinks they are really bad at something (for example math) and they have learned not to trust their own intuition at all so they make really wild errors by second guessing themselves?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
90 Posts 19 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

    @Bumblefish @3TomatoesShort @EverydayMoggie

    Absolutely.

    But if you want to copy an angle to a new location that won't help.

    That’s a morayB This user is from outside of this forum
    That’s a morayB This user is from outside of this forum
    That’s a moray
    wrote last edited by
    #73

    @futurebird @3TomatoesShort @EverydayMoggie Tracing paper FTW!

    myrmepropagandistF 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • That’s a morayB That’s a moray

      @futurebird @3TomatoesShort @EverydayMoggie Tracing paper FTW!

      myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
      myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
      myrmepropagandist
      wrote last edited by
      #74

      @Bumblefish @3TomatoesShort @EverydayMoggie

      Tracing paper isn't really making a copy. It's just the same figure again. As I see it anyways.

      But my point here is that it take two "measurements" with these tools.

      I'm going to use some of this I think. Very cool stuff.

      That’s a morayB 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

        @Bumblefish @3TomatoesShort @EverydayMoggie

        Tracing paper isn't really making a copy. It's just the same figure again. As I see it anyways.

        But my point here is that it take two "measurements" with these tools.

        I'm going to use some of this I think. Very cool stuff.

        That’s a morayB This user is from outside of this forum
        That’s a morayB This user is from outside of this forum
        That’s a moray
        wrote last edited by
        #75

        @futurebird @3TomatoesShort @EverydayMoggie Copy/paste works too…but this is basically how every conversation I have with math teachers goes, and I feel bad because I don’t get it, and it must be annoying for them all. In high school my last teacher just said I don’t actually need to know it and put me in a basic class where we learned to calculate rent on a low salary. Now that was easy to understand!

        myrmepropagandistF 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

          Is there a name for when someone thinks they are really bad at something (for example math) and they have learned not to trust their own intuition at all so they make really wild errors by second guessing themselves?

          Here is a question:
          Which angles are equal?

          To me this is an "easy" question even if you don't know about isosceles triangles or anything. The symmetry of the figure suggests that 3 and 2 are congruent.

          I have a student who is struggling with this kind of thing.

          undeadU This user is from outside of this forum
          undeadU This user is from outside of this forum
          undead
          wrote last edited by
          #76

          @futurebird

          If I saw the numbers *inside* the angles as a kid, I would have said they are not equal. That has nothing to do with the measurements of said angles, which match. I'm struggling to view them as equal as an adult.

          Descriptive mathematical statements in English are their own dialect, but are not treated as such by people who use math when interacting with people who don't speak that dialect.

          Question is easy, meaning derived from phrasing is hard.

          undeadU 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • undeadU undead

            @futurebird

            If I saw the numbers *inside* the angles as a kid, I would have said they are not equal. That has nothing to do with the measurements of said angles, which match. I'm struggling to view them as equal as an adult.

            Descriptive mathematical statements in English are their own dialect, but are not treated as such by people who use math when interacting with people who don't speak that dialect.

            Question is easy, meaning derived from phrasing is hard.

            undeadU This user is from outside of this forum
            undeadU This user is from outside of this forum
            undead
            wrote last edited by
            #77

            @futurebird

            This is why basic math and esp. geometry were hard for me, but algebra was easy.

            I had two math teachers in a room describe what they said was the same solution to the same problem, but I heard two different problems, solutions, and answers. They were both very exacting about what was the right answer, but became flustered when I brought up what didn't match up for me. In this thread, I've seen multiple notations for the same thing. To me, they are all different problems.

            myrmepropagandistF 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • undeadU undead

              @futurebird

              This is why basic math and esp. geometry were hard for me, but algebra was easy.

              I had two math teachers in a room describe what they said was the same solution to the same problem, but I heard two different problems, solutions, and answers. They were both very exacting about what was the right answer, but became flustered when I brought up what didn't match up for me. In this thread, I've seen multiple notations for the same thing. To me, they are all different problems.

              myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
              myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
              myrmepropagandist
              wrote last edited by
              #78

              @undead

              The things that are the same are what we are really trying to talk about.

              undeadU 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

                @undead

                The things that are the same are what we are really trying to talk about.

                undeadU This user is from outside of this forum
                undeadU This user is from outside of this forum
                undead
                wrote last edited by
                #79

                @futurebird

                Ok. Sorry for being offbase.

                myrmepropagandistF 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • undeadU undead

                  @futurebird

                  Ok. Sorry for being offbase.

                  myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                  myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                  myrmepropagandist
                  wrote last edited by
                  #80

                  @undead

                  I didn't mean that you were off base. (Nor do I think you have anything to apologize for. )

                  It's fine to prefer a certain notation ... but the notation isn't really what it's about. I'm just suggesting that as a thread to pull to get past what isn't as important here.

                  I'm very particular about notation because I know it can be confusing as I explain here:

                  myrmepropagandist (@futurebird@sauropods.win)

                  @jetlagjen@gts.phillipsuk.org We use the numbers consistently because I find using three letters is more confusing for most students. eg ∠ABC = ∠BCA vs. ∠3 = ∠2 Which do you find less confusing? We could also do ∠B = ∠C but naming angles by single letter is a bad habit since there can be multiple angles at a vertex.

                  favicon

                  Sauropods.win (sauropods.win)

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • ? Guest

                    @futurebird the more I think about, the more I think we may have used capital letters for vertices and lower case for angles as an unspoken convention. Like, maybe A, B, C for vertices and x, y, z for angles.

                    I've just checked my son's maths dictionary, and I can't see any vertices labeled in the angles or triangles sections.

                    It's entirely possible that it's any one (or several) of a hundred other things tripping up your student. Brains are weird and varied.

                    ? Offline
                    ? Offline
                    Guest
                    wrote last edited by
                    #81

                    @jetlagjen @futurebird

                    A, B, C for vertices, α, β, γ for angles? But what would I know? It's all Greek to me! 😉

                    Someone posted a link to this a while back; interesting in the context of the presentation discussion:

                    [#AltTextForMe - help!]

                    I thought it was obvious, but I'd seen in a Primary Maths Challenge (aimed at 9/10, 10/11 year old UK kids) … How many different isosceles triangles with whole number sides can you make from a loop of string 21 units long?
                    https://www.theguardian.com/science/2025/feb/17/can-you-solve-it-the-simple-geometry-question-that-fools-almost-everyone
                    :

                    myrmepropagandistF AndrewC 3 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • ? Guest

                      @jetlagjen @futurebird

                      A, B, C for vertices, α, β, γ for angles? But what would I know? It's all Greek to me! 😉

                      Someone posted a link to this a while back; interesting in the context of the presentation discussion:

                      [#AltTextForMe - help!]

                      I thought it was obvious, but I'd seen in a Primary Maths Challenge (aimed at 9/10, 10/11 year old UK kids) … How many different isosceles triangles with whole number sides can you make from a loop of string 21 units long?
                      https://www.theguardian.com/science/2025/feb/17/can-you-solve-it-the-simple-geometry-question-that-fools-almost-everyone
                      :

                      myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                      myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                      myrmepropagandist
                      wrote last edited by
                      #82

                      @hitsuyonai @jetlagjen

                      "drawing is NOT to scale"

                      the nerve.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • ? Guest

                        @jetlagjen @futurebird

                        A, B, C for vertices, α, β, γ for angles? But what would I know? It's all Greek to me! 😉

                        Someone posted a link to this a while back; interesting in the context of the presentation discussion:

                        [#AltTextForMe - help!]

                        I thought it was obvious, but I'd seen in a Primary Maths Challenge (aimed at 9/10, 10/11 year old UK kids) … How many different isosceles triangles with whole number sides can you make from a loop of string 21 units long?
                        https://www.theguardian.com/science/2025/feb/17/can-you-solve-it-the-simple-geometry-question-that-fools-almost-everyone
                        :

                        AndrewC This user is from outside of this forum
                        AndrewC This user is from outside of this forum
                        Andrew
                        wrote last edited by
                        #83

                        @hitsuyonai @jetlagjen @futurebird oh! Took me a bit. That’s just cruel

                        myrmepropagandistF 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • AndrewC Andrew

                          @hitsuyonai @jetlagjen @futurebird oh! Took me a bit. That’s just cruel

                          myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                          myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                          myrmepropagandist
                          wrote last edited by
                          #84

                          @cinebox @hitsuyonai @jetlagjen

                          It's a troll.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • ? Guest

                            @jetlagjen @futurebird

                            A, B, C for vertices, α, β, γ for angles? But what would I know? It's all Greek to me! 😉

                            Someone posted a link to this a while back; interesting in the context of the presentation discussion:

                            [#AltTextForMe - help!]

                            I thought it was obvious, but I'd seen in a Primary Maths Challenge (aimed at 9/10, 10/11 year old UK kids) … How many different isosceles triangles with whole number sides can you make from a loop of string 21 units long?
                            https://www.theguardian.com/science/2025/feb/17/can-you-solve-it-the-simple-geometry-question-that-fools-almost-everyone
                            :

                            myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                            myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                            myrmepropagandist
                            wrote last edited by
                            #85

                            @hitsuyonai @jetlagjen

                            ? 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

                              @hitsuyonai @jetlagjen

                              ? Offline
                              ? Offline
                              Guest
                              wrote last edited by
                              #86

                              @futurebird @hitsuyonai @jetlagjen Honestly kinda hard to think about how to text-describe this when it's primarily(??) a visual troll-- that it's drawing the triangle as having 2-dimensional volume, when in fact it pointedly does not.

                              Does just saying "triangle" do that enough, and make a strong enough "this is in 2D" impression? should I go back and add more spacial descriptors, e.g. saying the segment goes "down" from A to D?

                              myrmepropagandistF 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • That’s a morayB That’s a moray

                                @futurebird @3TomatoesShort @EverydayMoggie Copy/paste works too…but this is basically how every conversation I have with math teachers goes, and I feel bad because I don’t get it, and it must be annoying for them all. In high school my last teacher just said I don’t actually need to know it and put me in a basic class where we learned to calculate rent on a low salary. Now that was easy to understand!

                                myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                                myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                                myrmepropagandist
                                wrote last edited by
                                #87

                                @Bumblefish @3TomatoesShort @EverydayMoggie

                                The reasoning you did to make this conclusion:

                                That’s a moray (@Bumblefish@mastodon.scot)

                                @futurebird@sauropods.win @3TomatoesShort@disabled.social @EverydayMoggie@sfba.social The opposite one will always be the same size.

                                favicon

                                mastodon.scot (mastodon.scot)

                                ... means you can understand geometry and congruent triangles.

                                To know those "slices" are equivalent is "Side Angle Side"

                                I think you just need to learn to like the compass better as a way to deal with lengths. It can be very powerful I'll show you an example. Someone posted a nasty trick question on this thread. Thinking about it with a compass makes the trick vanish.

                                myrmepropagandistF 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

                                  @Bumblefish @3TomatoesShort @EverydayMoggie

                                  The reasoning you did to make this conclusion:

                                  That’s a moray (@Bumblefish@mastodon.scot)

                                  @futurebird@sauropods.win @3TomatoesShort@disabled.social @EverydayMoggie@sfba.social The opposite one will always be the same size.

                                  favicon

                                  mastodon.scot (mastodon.scot)

                                  ... means you can understand geometry and congruent triangles.

                                  To know those "slices" are equivalent is "Side Angle Side"

                                  I think you just need to learn to like the compass better as a way to deal with lengths. It can be very powerful I'll show you an example. Someone posted a nasty trick question on this thread. Thinking about it with a compass makes the trick vanish.

                                  myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                                  myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                                  myrmepropagandist
                                  wrote last edited by futurebird@sauropods.win
                                  #88

                                  @Bumblefish @3TomatoesShort @EverydayMoggie

                                  OK here is the trick question in the replies I show how to answer it with a compass.

                                  Link Preview Image
                                  Hitsu Yonai (@hitsuyonai@mastodon.online)

                                  Attached: 1 image @jetlagjen@gts.phillipsuk.org @futurebird@sauropods.win A, B, C for vertices, α, β, γ for angles? But what would I know? It's all Greek to me! 😉 Someone posted a link to this a while back; interesting in the context of the presentation discussion: [#AltTextForMe - help!] I thought it was obvious, but I'd seen in a Primary Maths Challenge (aimed at 9/10, 10/11 year old UK kids) … How many different isosceles triangles with whole number sides can you make from a loop of string 21 units long? https://www.theguardian.com/science/2025/feb/17/can-you-solve-it-the-simple-geometry-question-that-fools-almost-everyone :

                                  favicon

                                  Mastodon (mastodon.online)

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • ? Guest

                                    @futurebird @hitsuyonai @jetlagjen Honestly kinda hard to think about how to text-describe this when it's primarily(??) a visual troll-- that it's drawing the triangle as having 2-dimensional volume, when in fact it pointedly does not.

                                    Does just saying "triangle" do that enough, and make a strong enough "this is in 2D" impression? should I go back and add more spacial descriptors, e.g. saying the segment goes "down" from A to D?

                                    myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                                    myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                                    myrmepropagandist
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #89

                                    @gaditb @hitsuyonai @jetlagjen

                                    I think some of the descriptions were fine. Those that mention it's not to scale. Maybe it's an example of when having the description is superior to seeing the image visually.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • That’s a morayB That’s a moray

                                      @futurebird @3TomatoesShort @EverydayMoggie Infinite spiral of isosceles triangles, just eyeballed

                                      myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                                      myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                                      myrmepropagandist
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #90

                                      @Bumblefish @3TomatoesShort @EverydayMoggie

                                      ... are you a spider?

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0

                                      Reply
                                      • Reply as topic
                                      Log in to reply
                                      • Oldest to Newest
                                      • Newest to Oldest
                                      • Most Votes


                                      • 1
                                      • 2
                                      • 3
                                      • 4
                                      • 5
                                      • Login

                                      • Don't have an account? Register

                                      • Login or register to search.
                                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      0
                                      • Categories
                                      • Recent
                                      • Tags
                                      • Popular
                                      • World
                                      • Users
                                      • Groups