Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Chebucto Regional Softball Club

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Did you really think it would be that easy
A forum for discussing and organizing recreational softball and baseball games and leagues in the greater Halifax area.

Did you really think it would be that easy

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
rpgmemes
46 Posts 23 Posters 2 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ? Guest
    Okay, so, thought experiment. Someone gets cut into a lot of pieces. What do you have to touch to resurrect them? The largest piece? Any piece? No piece, the body is destroyed? What constitutes 'destroyed'? If getting cut into pieces counts, then how much of the body has to be missing? RAW doesn't really adequately address this situation.
    ? Offline
    ? Offline
    Guest
    wrote last edited by
    #37
    My comment was about the plan for gentle repose, but if you're talking about the resurrection spell it does have text that overcomes this problem, because it regenerates any lost limbs.
    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    1
    0
    • ? Guest
      My comment was about the plan for gentle repose, but if you're talking about the resurrection spell it does have text that overcomes this problem, because it regenerates any lost limbs.
      ? Offline
      ? Offline
      Guest
      wrote last edited by
      #38
      Sure, but... which piece gets regenerated? The one you touch? In that case, why couldn't the spell be cast on the severed finger to regenerate an entire body attached to it?
      ? 1 Reply Last reply
      1
      0
      • ? Guest
        Sure, but... which piece gets regenerated? The one you touch? In that case, why couldn't the spell be cast on the severed finger to regenerate an entire body attached to it?
        ? Offline
        ? Offline
        Guest
        wrote last edited by
        #39
        It can. My problem was using gentle repose on a severed finger. Looking back it seems like that might not be what you were suggesting. If so my mistake.
        ? 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • ? Guest
          It can. My problem was using gentle repose on a severed finger. Looking back it seems like that might not be what you were suggesting. If so my mistake.
          ? Offline
          ? Offline
          Guest
          wrote last edited by
          #40
          Ah, sorry, I think there's two different competing discussions happening in this same thread. I'm also getting confused about what's being discussed. 😄
          ? 1 Reply Last reply
          1
          0
          • ? Guest
            Ah, sorry, I think there's two different competing discussions happening in this same thread. I'm also getting confused about what's being discussed. 😄
            ? Offline
            ? Offline
            Guest
            wrote last edited by
            #41
            Magic doesn't make any sense. lol
            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.comS stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              This post did not contain any content.
              ? Offline
              ? Offline
              Guest
              wrote last edited by
              #42
              Lord British be like
              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • ? Guest
                This really gets into the foundational expectations of the setting. In a reality structured to allow for Heroes, a leader *must* be one, or else be replaced by the next one to stroll through.
                D This user is from outside of this forum
                D This user is from outside of this forum
                dragontypewyvern@midwest.social
                wrote last edited by
                #43
                Hero might be the wrong word except in the traditional sense of demigod. I'd also argue that it's more that monarchy by its own self justification is based on the idea that the king protects, and therefore effectively owns, his subjects. A king might do that by effective governance however. If they can't do it personally they'd need the loyalty of a champion, for example.
                1 Reply Last reply
                1
                0
                • A archpawn@lemmy.world
                  I thought this was going to be spam. I recommend saying what you're posting a link to. Or at least something that makes it clear you're replying to a specific comment instead of posting that at random.
                  ? Offline
                  ? Offline
                  Guest
                  wrote last edited by
                  #44
                  I responded to his comment about the Birthright setting with a video on the Birthright setting. I suppose I could have been more clear, but I definitely did respond to someone and did not post at random. >Funny thing, there was a 2e setting called Birthright, which pretty much made the game about developing land as a lord, rather than dungeon delving
                  A 1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  0
                  • ? Guest
                    I responded to his comment about the Birthright setting with a video on the Birthright setting. I suppose I could have been more clear, but I definitely did respond to someone and did not post at random. >Funny thing, there was a 2e setting called Birthright, which pretty much made the game about developing land as a lord, rather than dungeon delving
                    A This user is from outside of this forum
                    A This user is from outside of this forum
                    archpawn@lemmy.world
                    wrote last edited by
                    #45
                    I know. It's just that I only know because I clicked the link.
                    ? 1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    0
                    • A archpawn@lemmy.world
                      I know. It's just that I only know because I clicked the link.
                      ? Offline
                      ? Offline
                      Guest
                      wrote last edited by
                      #46
                      Fair enough. I will keep it in mind. 🙂
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      0

                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • 1
                      • 2
                      • 3
                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups