I find it interesting that there's loads of people who made a core part of their identity campaigning against trans women being in women's spaces and how it impacts women, who have gone completely silent about Grok being used to undress and brutalise w...
-
@budgegeria @GossiTheDog
Grok is not so stupid to reveal his identity.
The Homeland Security Secretary - not so much.
The shooter has been identified: https://www.startribune.com/ice-agent-who-fatally-shot-woman-in-minneapolis-is-identified/601560214@jbiserkov @GossiTheDog Since Grok sometimes disobeyed his master, I wouldn't be suprised about that, for what I know about AI.
-
It looks like the threat of X being banned in the UK worked - Grok has been limited to paid users. Take your crying with laughter emojis and stick them up your arse, Elon. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c99kn52nx9do
@GossiTheDog So it’s all right to generate dirty pictures of kids as long as you pay for them? It was always thus.
-
It looks like the threat of X being banned in the UK worked - Grok has been limited to paid users. Take your crying with laughter emojis and stick them up your arse, Elon. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c99kn52nx9do
@GossiTheDog Right, so they've pivoted from undressing women and underage girls for free, to profiting from it.
For sure they have some rough idea "who" might be using it now rather than it being "anonymous", but it hardly fixes the root problem does it?
-
It looks like the threat of X being banned in the UK worked - Grok has been limited to paid users. Take your crying with laughter emojis and stick them up your arse, Elon. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c99kn52nx9do
@GossiTheDog But still allowing CSAM if you pay for the right.
-
I think the principle is that anyone using it do crime will have their personal information conveniently packaged for the relevant authorities.
Obviously you and me would say "Nobody should be able to do this" but we don't understand business, or something.
@davey_cakes @GossiTheDog what relevant authorities? Someone looking to hire new people to the US administration?
-
@davey_cakes @GossiTheDog what relevant authorities? Someone looking to hire new people to the US administration?
@matus_chochlik @GossiTheDog fuck, at the current rate of going, probably
-
It looks like the threat of X being banned in the UK worked - Grok has been limited to paid users. Take your crying with laughter emojis and stick them up your arse, Elon. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c99kn52nx9do
"From now on, we'll only participate in production and distribution of illegal sexual imagery if you pay us" isn't really the principles stance that Musk thinks it is. If anything, it's worse.
-
It looks like the threat of X being banned in the UK worked - Grok has been limited to paid users. Take your crying with laughter emojis and stick them up your arse, Elon. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c99kn52nx9do
@GossiTheDog So he's gone from "providing a tool that generates CSAM unregulated" to "providing a tool that generates CSAM for money". Not sure that helps his legal case, if indeed he cares about that.
-
It looks like the threat of X being banned in the UK worked - Grok has been limited to paid users. Take your crying with laughter emojis and stick them up your arse, Elon. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c99kn52nx9do
@GossiTheDog
Apparently it's a smoke screen. https://www.theverge.com/news/859309/grok-undressing-limit-access-gaslighting -
The Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) says its analysts have discovered "criminal imagery" of girls aged between 11 and 13 which "appears to have been created" using Grok. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvg1mzlryxeo
-
It looks like the threat of X being banned in the UK worked - Grok has been limited to paid users. Take your crying with laughter emojis and stick them up your arse, Elon. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c99kn52nx9do
@GossiTheDog How does this solve UK's problem? It only reduces it to paid subscribers.
The proper solution would be to disable access to image-editing features of Grok for UK-based users (no matter whether paying or not). (And also for all other countries that have a problem with it.)
-
@GossiTheDog How does this solve UK's problem? It only reduces it to paid subscribers.
The proper solution would be to disable access to image-editing features of Grok for UK-based users (no matter whether paying or not). (And also for all other countries that have a problem with it.)
@bontchev @GossiTheDog
Be better blocking the output from grok, surely. As people intent on mischief have historically never had an issue paying the fee for a blue tick. And just having something potentially CSAM turn up on your phone can be catastrophic legally, no matter who created it or asked for it. -
It looks like the threat of X being banned in the UK worked - Grok has been limited to paid users. Take your crying with laughter emojis and stick them up your arse, Elon. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c99kn52nx9do
The UK government says the move by X to limit Grok to paid users is “insulting” and basically monetising abuse, and they would support a ban of X in the UK if recommended by the regulator. They’ve asked the regulator for recommendations in days. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c99kn52nx9do
-
The UK government says the move by X to limit Grok to paid users is “insulting” and basically monetising abuse, and they would support a ban of X in the UK if recommended by the regulator. They’ve asked the regulator for recommendations in days. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c99kn52nx9do
@GossiTheDog delighted and kind of confused.
Did Santa bring spines to Labour leadership?
-
@GossiTheDog delighted and kind of confused.
Did Santa bring spines to Labour leadership?
@davey_cakes Elon threatened to replace the PM and overthrow the UK government, he’s monitored by GCHQ as a result as a threat to national security. I think the latest stunt may be the final straw.
-
The UK government says the move by X to limit Grok to paid users is “insulting” and basically monetising abuse, and they would support a ban of X in the UK if recommended by the regulator. They’ve asked the regulator for recommendations in days. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c99kn52nx9do
the tech industry sure loves it's asshole personalities.. whether are on the spectrum or not..
-
@davey_cakes Elon threatened to replace the PM and overthrow the UK government, he’s monitored by GCHQ as a result as a threat to national security. I think the latest stunt may be the final straw.
@GossiTheDog jesus I missed that one, have been tuning his bullshit out a while
-
The UK government says the move by X to limit Grok to paid users is “insulting” and basically monetising abuse, and they would support a ban of X in the UK if recommended by the regulator. They’ve asked the regulator for recommendations in days. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c99kn52nx9do
@GossiTheDog then we get proof that X users are paying for child porn. Win.
-
The UK government says the move by X to limit Grok to paid users is “insulting” and basically monetising abuse, and they would support a ban of X in the UK if recommended by the regulator. They’ve asked the regulator for recommendations in days. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c99kn52nx9do
@GossiTheDog perhaps an idea would be to stop using it themselves or using it for for any official accounts.
-
The UK government says the move by X to limit Grok to paid users is “insulting” and basically monetising abuse, and they would support a ban of X in the UK if recommended by the regulator. They’ve asked the regulator for recommendations in days. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c99kn52nx9do
@GossiTheDog isn’t that „limited to paid users“ even fake news based on something Grok hallucinated to a journalist?
