Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Chebucto Regional Softball Club

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. @FeralRobots
A forum for discussing and organizing recreational softball and baseball games and leagues in the greater Halifax area.

@FeralRobots

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
16 Posts 9 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • okanogen VerminEnemyFromWithinO okanogen VerminEnemyFromWithin

    @arclight @FeralRobots @futurebird
    Can't speak about Kerr County, but the mayor of Kerrville was asked if he was invited on that call or on that call and he answered "no, I was not" to both.

    ? Offline
    ? Offline
    Guest
    wrote last edited by
    #5

    @Okanogen @FeralRobots @futurebird It is reasonable to ask which officials knew what when and what they did with that information.

    Also spending decisions for flood warning systems, especially when federal money was available. Did they take the opportunities they had to protect Texans and if not, why not?

    myrmepropagandistF 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • ? Guest

      @Okanogen @FeralRobots @futurebird It is reasonable to ask which officials knew what when and what they did with that information.

      Also spending decisions for flood warning systems, especially when federal money was available. Did they take the opportunities they had to protect Texans and if not, why not?

      myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
      myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
      myrmepropagandist
      wrote last edited by
      #6

      @arclight @Okanogen @FeralRobots

      It's not just reasonable it's what needs to be done after every disaster. How could this have been prevented? What will we do differently?

      If those aren't on the table then the public is being asked to accept that "these things happen and nothing can be done" and the scrambling from some of the leadership says they care more about this not "sticking" to them than fixing anything.

      To me it's very slick and inspires no trust. It's not leadership.

      Catherine is not complacentC Billy SmithB 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • ? Guest

        @Okanogen @FeralRobots @futurebird It is reasonable to ask which officials knew what when and what they did with that information.

        Also spending decisions for flood warning systems, especially when federal money was available. Did they take the opportunities they had to protect Texans and if not, why not?

        myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
        myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
        myrmepropagandist
        wrote last edited by
        #7

        @arclight @Okanogen @FeralRobots

        Real leadership is going after the problem with no regard for the impact on your political future. Just focusing on WHY and what could be changed.

        I don't like to assume that people don't care, but when the puffery comes first? I start to wonder.

        CarolynC 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

          @arclight @Okanogen @FeralRobots

          It's not just reasonable it's what needs to be done after every disaster. How could this have been prevented? What will we do differently?

          If those aren't on the table then the public is being asked to accept that "these things happen and nothing can be done" and the scrambling from some of the leadership says they care more about this not "sticking" to them than fixing anything.

          To me it's very slick and inspires no trust. It's not leadership.

          Catherine is not complacentC This user is from outside of this forum
          Catherine is not complacentC This user is from outside of this forum
          Catherine is not complacent
          wrote last edited by
          #8

          @futurebird @arclight @Okanogen @FeralRobots it’s what they do every time.
          “Oh this isn’t the time to talk about that, let’s pray and put up little cutout angels for the victims, it’s callous and hurtful to the families to bring that up now, no one could have seen this coming”.
          Everything from natural disasters to school shootings, same old tired bullshit.

          myrmepropagandistF 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • Catherine is not complacentC Catherine is not complacent

            @futurebird @arclight @Okanogen @FeralRobots it’s what they do every time.
            “Oh this isn’t the time to talk about that, let’s pray and put up little cutout angels for the victims, it’s callous and hurtful to the families to bring that up now, no one could have seen this coming”.
            Everything from natural disasters to school shootings, same old tired bullshit.

            myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
            myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
            myrmepropagandist
            wrote last edited by
            #9

            @CatDragon @arclight @Okanogen @FeralRobots

            It's insulting to tell people not to be angry. I go with my 5th grade students to a camp, and this has been giving me nightmares.

            At least I won't get as much push back about my insistence that they keep their phones phones on them. next year I think. (taking phones is just lazy, I yell at them to put them away and they *learn* to be polite with technology)

            A CassandrichD 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

              @arclight @Okanogen @FeralRobots

              Real leadership is going after the problem with no regard for the impact on your political future. Just focusing on WHY and what could be changed.

              I don't like to assume that people don't care, but when the puffery comes first? I start to wonder.

              CarolynC This user is from outside of this forum
              CarolynC This user is from outside of this forum
              Carolyn
              wrote last edited by
              #10

              @futurebird @arclight @Okanogen @FeralRobots Texas politicians have made it clear they don’t care about human life. The poor sods who differ from the norm will have a tough time ahead.

              myrmepropagandistF 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • CarolynC Carolyn

                @futurebird @arclight @Okanogen @FeralRobots Texas politicians have made it clear they don’t care about human life. The poor sods who differ from the norm will have a tough time ahead.

                myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                myrmepropagandist
                wrote last edited by
                #11

                @CStamp @arclight @Okanogen @FeralRobots

                Is it unreasonable that I expect that somethings ought to make some kind of more selfless state of awareness kick in? Like "if I could have done anything to stop this I need to find it and change it?" rather than all of the political calculations?

                Maybe. Probably.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

                  @CatDragon @arclight @Okanogen @FeralRobots

                  It's insulting to tell people not to be angry. I go with my 5th grade students to a camp, and this has been giving me nightmares.

                  At least I won't get as much push back about my insistence that they keep their phones phones on them. next year I think. (taking phones is just lazy, I yell at them to put them away and they *learn* to be polite with technology)

                  A This user is from outside of this forum
                  A This user is from outside of this forum
                  Demi Marie Obenour
                  wrote last edited by
                  #12

                  @futurebird @CatDragon @arclight @Okanogen@mastodon.social @FeralRobots Is that because they need to keeping their phones for emergency communication and they can have them on them without using them?

                  myrmepropagandistF 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

                    @CatDragon @arclight @Okanogen @FeralRobots

                    It's insulting to tell people not to be angry. I go with my 5th grade students to a camp, and this has been giving me nightmares.

                    At least I won't get as much push back about my insistence that they keep their phones phones on them. next year I think. (taking phones is just lazy, I yell at them to put them away and they *learn* to be polite with technology)

                    CassandrichD This user is from outside of this forum
                    CassandrichD This user is from outside of this forum
                    Cassandrich
                    wrote last edited by
                    #13

                    @futurebird @CatDragon @arclight @Okanogen @FeralRobots In the world we live in, it's horrifying that teachers would even consider taking a child's phone away from them.

                    No matter how much of a distraction it may be.

                    It's less bad than the alternative of being trapped in what's developing into a hostage situation with no way to communicate information to the outside or stranded without medical care during a natural disaster or trapped under rubble.

                    Not to mention the much more mundane needs of documenting abuses by other kids or authorities.

                    myrmepropagandistF 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • A Demi Marie Obenour

                      @futurebird @CatDragon @arclight @Okanogen@mastodon.social @FeralRobots Is that because they need to keeping their phones for emergency communication and they can have them on them without using them?

                      myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                      myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                      myrmepropagandist
                      wrote last edited by
                      #14

                      @alwayscurious @CatDragon @arclight @FeralRobots

                      Yes. And it's how they learn when it's OK to use their phone.

                      Frankly if a kid is on a trip and wants to text mom or dad I think they should be able to without asking for their phone from some box?

                      And YES there are many activities where I don't want to see the phones at all, but kids old enough to have them can learn these rules. (and if they can't you talk to the parents about if they should have one, which has always worked.)

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • CassandrichD Cassandrich

                        @futurebird @CatDragon @arclight @Okanogen @FeralRobots In the world we live in, it's horrifying that teachers would even consider taking a child's phone away from them.

                        No matter how much of a distraction it may be.

                        It's less bad than the alternative of being trapped in what's developing into a hostage situation with no way to communicate information to the outside or stranded without medical care during a natural disaster or trapped under rubble.

                        Not to mention the much more mundane needs of documenting abuses by other kids or authorities.

                        myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                        myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                        myrmepropagandist
                        wrote last edited by
                        #15

                        @dalias @CatDragon @arclight @Okanogen @FeralRobots

                        There is a mentality that "we didn't have phones so kids don't need them"

                        But those cabins probably didn't have party lines, or pay phones. The world isn't set up for people who don't have a phone on their person anymore so taking them away isn't like setting the clock back.

                        And frankly it's just safer when you can communicate if you need to.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

                          @arclight @Okanogen @FeralRobots

                          It's not just reasonable it's what needs to be done after every disaster. How could this have been prevented? What will we do differently?

                          If those aren't on the table then the public is being asked to accept that "these things happen and nothing can be done" and the scrambling from some of the leadership says they care more about this not "sticking" to them than fixing anything.

                          To me it's very slick and inspires no trust. It's not leadership.

                          Billy SmithB This user is from outside of this forum
                          Billy SmithB This user is from outside of this forum
                          Billy Smith
                          wrote last edited by
                          #16

                          @futurebird @arclight @Okanogen @FeralRobots

                          This was a thing in the South of France.

                          35-ish years ago, there were wide-scale floods, so every town in the South oof France built flood mitigation defences.

                          25 years ago, in Nimes, the town council were complaining about the constant maintenance bills for something "that we will never need..."

                          That year, they decided to ok the funding, but it was going to be reviewed next year.

                          1/2

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0

                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • World
                          • Users
                          • Groups