Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Chebucto Regional Softball Club

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Pete Buttigieg and Gavin Newsom know they're lying about trans kids.
A forum for discussing and organizing recreational softball and baseball games and leagues in the greater Halifax area.

Pete Buttigieg and Gavin Newsom know they're lying about trans kids.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
38 Posts 9 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • CurtAdamsC CurtAdams

    @futurebird @johnzajac @JessTheUnstill @foolishowl @PallasRiot The public thinks the Democrats are equally corrupt because the media spent VASTLY more time talking about Hillary Clinton using email the same way every previous Secretary of State did than they did talking about the hundreds of millions in fraud Trump did - including fraudulent charity operations *during the 2016 campaign* https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-37547094

    myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
    myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
    myrmepropagandist
    wrote last edited by
    #21

    @CurtAdams @johnzajac @JessTheUnstill @foolishowl @PallasRiot

    People who don't care about right-wing fake scandals also think they are corrupt. I'm talking about people who always vote for democrats and don't care about the emails.

    This isn't about media.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

      @CurtAdams @johnzajac

      This isn't, in my view, a problem of messaging or of voters "not knowing all the good things Biden did" I did my best to push that too! No. They would just say "but what about Pelosi trading stocks?" or "why is our foreign policy like that?" or "but what will they *do* about immigration?"

      Last one is interesting because it *wasn't* that they wanted harsh enforcement. Just a real change from this quasi-legal black market labor nonsense.

      CurtAdamsC This user is from outside of this forum
      CurtAdamsC This user is from outside of this forum
      CurtAdams
      wrote last edited by
      #22

      @futurebird @johnzajac We *did* have an immigration bill. Trump blocked it.

      The important point is that when the policies aren't good enough, the problem is almost always that the Democrats don't have a large enough majority.

      myrmepropagandistF 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • CurtAdamsC CurtAdams

        @futurebird @johnzajac We *did* have an immigration bill. Trump blocked it.

        The important point is that when the policies aren't good enough, the problem is almost always that the Democrats don't have a large enough majority.

        myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
        myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
        myrmepropagandist
        wrote last edited by
        #23

        @CurtAdams @johnzajac

        An immigration bill but also so much backing for more border security. Which is like admitting that the border was ever really a problem. If the thesis is that immigrants don't cause crime (because they don't) why do they keep doing things that suggest republicans are correct?

        CurtAdamsC JohnJ 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

          @CurtAdams @johnzajac

          An immigration bill but also so much backing for more border security. Which is like admitting that the border was ever really a problem. If the thesis is that immigrants don't cause crime (because they don't) why do they keep doing things that suggest republicans are correct?

          CurtAdamsC This user is from outside of this forum
          CurtAdamsC This user is from outside of this forum
          CurtAdams
          wrote last edited by
          #24

          @futurebird @johnzajac Well, because the Democrats had to have some Republican support to pass the bill.

          When Dems are really in control, like here in CA, we get sanctuary policies and healthcare for undocumented immigrants.

          myrmepropagandistF 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

            @CurtAdams @johnzajac

            An immigration bill but also so much backing for more border security. Which is like admitting that the border was ever really a problem. If the thesis is that immigrants don't cause crime (because they don't) why do they keep doing things that suggest republicans are correct?

            JohnJ This user is from outside of this forum
            JohnJ This user is from outside of this forum
            John
            wrote last edited by
            #25

            @futurebird @CurtAdams

            I think this is a distraction because political leadership is about so much more than legislation, which is something Republicans have understood since Reagan and something Democrats haven't understood since JFK and RFK were assassinated.

            The real missed play here isn't "immigration legislation"; it's calling out GOP lies about the impact immigration has on the country. It's acknowledging and celebrating our reliance on migrant workers. It's supporting their unions.

            myrmepropagandistF 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • CurtAdamsC CurtAdams

              @futurebird @johnzajac Well, because the Democrats had to have some Republican support to pass the bill.

              When Dems are really in control, like here in CA, we get sanctuary policies and healthcare for undocumented immigrants.

              myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
              myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
              myrmepropagandist
              wrote last edited by
              #26

              @CurtAdams @johnzajac

              Do you think that if Democrats keep doing what they have been doing they will win?

              Frankly, as a very practical matter, that's my top concern. How do they wrestle back enough power to move us away from this cliff? And further, if they do get power will they be able to use it effectively?

              I have been trusting the democratic leadership "knows what they are doing" and I think that's a big mistake now.

              For example: They could stop trading stocks. They could do that today.

              myrmepropagandistF Tim RichardsT 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

                @CurtAdams @johnzajac

                Do you think that if Democrats keep doing what they have been doing they will win?

                Frankly, as a very practical matter, that's my top concern. How do they wrestle back enough power to move us away from this cliff? And further, if they do get power will they be able to use it effectively?

                I have been trusting the democratic leadership "knows what they are doing" and I think that's a big mistake now.

                For example: They could stop trading stocks. They could do that today.

                myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                myrmepropagandist
                wrote last edited by
                #27

                @CurtAdams @johnzajac

                They keep saying "democracy is in danger" and I believe them.

                Yet some of their actions don't tell that same story.

                myrmepropagandistF 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • JohnJ John

                  @futurebird @CurtAdams

                  I think this is a distraction because political leadership is about so much more than legislation, which is something Republicans have understood since Reagan and something Democrats haven't understood since JFK and RFK were assassinated.

                  The real missed play here isn't "immigration legislation"; it's calling out GOP lies about the impact immigration has on the country. It's acknowledging and celebrating our reliance on migrant workers. It's supporting their unions.

                  myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                  myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                  myrmepropagandist
                  wrote last edited by
                  #28

                  @johnzajac @CurtAdams

                  "It's supporting their unions."

                  The union angle is the perfect one IMO. Because people who have had their wages depressed by immigrant labor are just people we pretend don't exist. Republicans also don't talk about this exactly, they just do racism.

                  If the line were "everyone should be able to unionize. no one should have to compete against off the books labor" I think it'd make a real difference with the kind of voters who have drifted away from democrats.

                  JohnJ 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

                    @johnzajac @CurtAdams

                    "It's supporting their unions."

                    The union angle is the perfect one IMO. Because people who have had their wages depressed by immigrant labor are just people we pretend don't exist. Republicans also don't talk about this exactly, they just do racism.

                    If the line were "everyone should be able to unionize. no one should have to compete against off the books labor" I think it'd make a real difference with the kind of voters who have drifted away from democrats.

                    JohnJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    JohnJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    John
                    wrote last edited by
                    #29

                    @futurebird @CurtAdams

                    I agree with this.

                    IMO, the real issue then is one of credibility: Biden breaking the railroad strike harmed the Democrats far more than they acknowledge. That New Palestine happened weeks later, and they spent weeks trying to bury the story (despite the *black mushroom cloud* lol) just highlighted how wrong Biden was.

                    Democrats need consistency, and they need to enforce loyalty in the party ranks. WE know they can do that, because they *routinely* do it on the left.

                    JohnJ siderealS 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • JohnJ John

                      @futurebird @CurtAdams

                      I agree with this.

                      IMO, the real issue then is one of credibility: Biden breaking the railroad strike harmed the Democrats far more than they acknowledge. That New Palestine happened weeks later, and they spent weeks trying to bury the story (despite the *black mushroom cloud* lol) just highlighted how wrong Biden was.

                      Democrats need consistency, and they need to enforce loyalty in the party ranks. WE know they can do that, because they *routinely* do it on the left.

                      JohnJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      JohnJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      John
                      wrote last edited by
                      #30

                      @futurebird @CurtAdams

                      It's kind of our earlier discussion: a scheme to eliminate big donors doesn't work if you fudge it just a *leeeetle* bit for these specific big donors.

                      A loud support of unions doesn't matter if it comes and goes depending on what the consultants say.

                      EDIT: I think Democrats are addicted to default votes and have literally forgotten how to get affirmative ones. That's why absent a completely re-do of their leadership, I struggle to see the party doing any of this.

                      myrmepropagandistF 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • JohnJ John

                        @futurebird @CurtAdams

                        I agree with this.

                        IMO, the real issue then is one of credibility: Biden breaking the railroad strike harmed the Democrats far more than they acknowledge. That New Palestine happened weeks later, and they spent weeks trying to bury the story (despite the *black mushroom cloud* lol) just highlighted how wrong Biden was.

                        Democrats need consistency, and they need to enforce loyalty in the party ranks. WE know they can do that, because they *routinely* do it on the left.

                        siderealS This user is from outside of this forum
                        siderealS This user is from outside of this forum
                        sidereal
                        wrote last edited by
                        #31

                        @johnzajac @futurebird @CurtAdams Around here, Biden breaking the railroad strike shredded confidence in the Dems amongst workers in the trades.

                        myrmepropagandistF 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • JohnJ John

                          @futurebird @CurtAdams

                          It's kind of our earlier discussion: a scheme to eliminate big donors doesn't work if you fudge it just a *leeeetle* bit for these specific big donors.

                          A loud support of unions doesn't matter if it comes and goes depending on what the consultants say.

                          EDIT: I think Democrats are addicted to default votes and have literally forgotten how to get affirmative ones. That's why absent a completely re-do of their leadership, I struggle to see the party doing any of this.

                          myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                          myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                          myrmepropagandist
                          wrote last edited by
                          #32

                          @johnzajac @CurtAdams

                          "Are you a real one?"

                          If this is a battle against the corrupt it's important to ... not be corrupt. And I don't mean "corrupt" as in breaking laws, I mean not being beholden to special interests of big business or foreign governments.

                          There is this idea that if the Republicans are "just as bad" on an issue we can ignore it. I think that's a mistake.

                          Yes, they should win because they are "better" but nobody believes them anymore and that is a problem.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • siderealS sidereal

                            @johnzajac @futurebird @CurtAdams Around here, Biden breaking the railroad strike shredded confidence in the Dems amongst workers in the trades.

                            myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                            myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                            myrmepropagandist
                            wrote last edited by
                            #33

                            @sidereal @johnzajac @CurtAdams

                            You know what makes it worse? In the long run he did come around. Like I do think this issue was blown up more than it should have been. And he tried hard to course correct. But his initial issues were way off.

                            Way off.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

                              @CurtAdams @johnzajac

                              They keep saying "democracy is in danger" and I believe them.

                              Yet some of their actions don't tell that same story.

                              myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                              myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                              myrmepropagandist
                              wrote last edited by
                              #34

                              @CurtAdams @johnzajac

                              In this post I make a suggestion for one thing they might be able to do right now:

                              myrmepropagandist (@futurebird@sauropods.win)

                              Content warning: US Pol: What I Think Democrats Should Do

                              favicon

                              Sauropods.win (sauropods.win)

                              CurtAdamsC 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

                                @CurtAdams @johnzajac

                                Do you think that if Democrats keep doing what they have been doing they will win?

                                Frankly, as a very practical matter, that's my top concern. How do they wrestle back enough power to move us away from this cliff? And further, if they do get power will they be able to use it effectively?

                                I have been trusting the democratic leadership "knows what they are doing" and I think that's a big mistake now.

                                For example: They could stop trading stocks. They could do that today.

                                Tim RichardsT This user is from outside of this forum
                                Tim RichardsT This user is from outside of this forum
                                Tim Richards
                                wrote last edited by
                                #35

                                @futurebird @CurtAdams @johnzajac Are they actually doing anything? From this distance they seem inert.

                                myrmepropagandistF 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • Tim RichardsT Tim Richards

                                  @futurebird @CurtAdams @johnzajac Are they actually doing anything? From this distance they seem inert.

                                  myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                                  myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                                  myrmepropagandist
                                  wrote last edited by futurebird@sauropods.win
                                  #36

                                  @timrichards @CurtAdams @johnzajac

                                  It is very hard to get much done as a minority party and they have a few actions-- but, nothing that helps to define who they are other than "not Trump" (don't get me wrong for some of us that's enough, but not everyone)

                                  I have a possible suggestion since I don't think they will unite behind any left wing ideas, not all of the democrats.

                                  But one thing they could all do is clean up the roots of corruption that no voters like.

                                  myrmepropagandist (@futurebird@sauropods.win)

                                  Content warning: US Pol: What I Think Democrats Should Do

                                  favicon

                                  Sauropods.win (sauropods.win)

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

                                    @CurtAdams @johnzajac

                                    In this post I make a suggestion for one thing they might be able to do right now:

                                    myrmepropagandist (@futurebird@sauropods.win)

                                    Content warning: US Pol: What I Think Democrats Should Do

                                    favicon

                                    Sauropods.win (sauropods.win)

                                    CurtAdamsC This user is from outside of this forum
                                    CurtAdamsC This user is from outside of this forum
                                    CurtAdams
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #37

                                    @futurebird @johnzajac I very much like a "Contract with America" proposal, and no Congressional/Presidential stock trading belongs at the top of the list.

                                    Except - they've already proposed such a bill!

                                    myrmepropagandistF 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • CurtAdamsC CurtAdams

                                      @futurebird @johnzajac I very much like a "Contract with America" proposal, and no Congressional/Presidential stock trading belongs at the top of the list.

                                      Except - they've already proposed such a bill!

                                      myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                                      myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                                      myrmepropagandist
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #38

                                      @CurtAdams @johnzajac

                                      I know. But why not just do it without the bill now?

                                      Then ask why the Republicans won't?

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0

                                      Reply
                                      • Reply as topic
                                      Log in to reply
                                      • Oldest to Newest
                                      • Newest to Oldest
                                      • Most Votes


                                      • 1
                                      • 2
                                      • Login

                                      • Don't have an account? Register

                                      • Login or register to search.
                                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      0
                                      • Categories
                                      • Recent
                                      • Tags
                                      • Popular
                                      • World
                                      • Users
                                      • Groups