"Ocular scan data" will be the least of our problems. Nobody outside of bad spy movies uses ocular scans for identification and access control ...
G
glitzersachen@hachyderm.io
@glitzersachen@hachyderm.io
A forum for discussing and organizing recreational softball and baseball games and leagues in the greater Halifax area.
Posts
-
I think a lot of people are attracted to "Sora" the AI video and serve use generating application because it will put your face in a video. -
ugh I remember this mf from 90s usenet, he would pontificate endlessly but never seemed to actually work on anythingI am relying on the idea that it cannot be built. Not by this people. My bet is that AGI is still 250 years out. Science history is actually on my side there: The effort needed to built "artificial creatures" has been underestimated since at least since 1800 (plus/minus). I'd be surprised if it came out different this time around.
And the OpenAI "everything is a neural network the rest will emerge / can be trained" totally ignores previous work on possible architectures of mind.
After the bubble bursts, the topic will so toxic and touched again earliest 50 years later (2075). In the time in between we'll be busy to push back other apocalypses ... so it's even likely we'll not be in the mood in 2075 to start a new AI research program.
For people who think (technological) progress is steady upward, I'd like to point to the space program.