Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Chebucto Regional Softball Club

G

gullible@sh.itjust.works

@gullible@sh.itjust.works
A forum for discussing and organizing recreational softball and baseball games and leagues in the greater Halifax area.
About
Posts
15
Topics
0
Shares
0
Groups
0
Followers
0
Following
0

Posts

Recent Best Controversial

  • But why?
    G IndescribablySad@threads.net
    I’ve mostly got the vernacular down now! Also, I want to say “how dare you?” a second time. Just read to the most recent chapter of kill 6b demons, and now I need more!
    Uncategorized rpgmemes

  • Why Not Both?
    G IndescribablySad@threads.net
    Congratulations on the wedding ~planning!~
    Uncategorized rpgmemes

  • Ttrpg players be like
    G IndescribablySad@threads.net
    “Mmm, just like dad used to make.”
    Uncategorized rpgmemes

  • Typical player mindset
    G IndescribablySad@threads.net
    “While it is usually immune to nonmagical damage from +0 bolts, because you rolled a 20, the kraken will recognize you next time you’re nearby. It is currently too busy gleefully dismembering dozens of legendary adventurers to do respond. The captain, noticing that the titan’s gaze is fixed directly upon you, has put it to a vote whether to toss you off the ship. 0 damage, by the way.”
    Uncategorized rpgmemes

  • Satanic Math
    G IndescribablySad@threads.net
    Could you imagine doing 666 damage in one turn? I’d be riding that high for weeks.
    Uncategorized rpgmemes

  • But why?
    G IndescribablySad@threads.net
    Oh no, you didn’t come across that way at all! I just felt obligated to explain the reason for where I’ll begin reading, given that you were my impetus, and I needed to affirm to myself that it was the right course after how miserable call of Cthulhu ended up being for one of my players. You are a lovely person with excellent taste in ttrpgs, and also very probably too hard on yourself.
    Uncategorized rpgmemes

  • But why?
    G IndescribablySad@threads.net
    Don’t get me wrong, I’m absolutely going to read up on it after mythras. It will just take me so much longer to get the feeling for how to tell the story of benevolent armored core ostensibly set in Macross. And even longer to adapt the lexicon that it deserves. Like, I can currently describe thundering annihilation and cleaving the landscape in only so many ways. The mechanics are simple in comparison to avoiding repetitive verbiage. This is prime brisket. Mythras won’t require months for me to fully immerse myself, which is why I’m checking it first. It’s just much less involved and I need something to fall back on in case “the thing I’ve been super excited to show you guys” doesn’t fly.
    Uncategorized rpgmemes

  • But why?
    G IndescribablySad@threads.net
    Lancer seems interesting but terrifyingly involved between the fresh setting, combat that feels like two legendary monsters fighting, and the host of new adjectives I’ll have to incorporate into my vocabulary. I’d only heard about it once before, from a zee bashew video, and it seems far more fleshed out than what I expected. Mythras significantly cuts down on one of those, so I’ll probably try that one out. Multiple degrees of success and more gradation between the cost of actions seems pretty neat as well. Thank you for the recommendations! I’ll almost certainly need to chew on them for a while to really understand them, but I adore both setting and the mechanics behind them!
    Uncategorized rpgmemes

  • But why?
    G IndescribablySad@threads.net
    For war gaming, which system do you personally prefer, if you don’t mind my asking? I’m looking to molest some people with *something fresh* and pathfinder doesn’t always work out. I used to ask people on Reddit, but I’d rather not use that site again.
    Uncategorized rpgmemes

  • But why?
    G IndescribablySad@threads.net
    Oh, wargaming dnd? How’d you like it? Did 5e stand up well or did it need a lot of homebrewing?
    Uncategorized rpgmemes

  • But why?
    G IndescribablySad@threads.net
    The difference is pretty minor either way. I’ve never had more issues balancing this than I have with sorcerer burst damage or creation bards collapsing economies.
    Uncategorized rpgmemes

  • But why?
    G IndescribablySad@threads.net
    How long did that take you?? The highest we’ve ever gone is level 11, and that took a couple of years.
    Uncategorized rpgmemes

  • But why?
    G IndescribablySad@threads.net
    If you know anyone who has actually reached 20th level in a campaign, it might make a difference. I’ll put you in my will if I hit the lottery.
    Uncategorized rpgmemes

  • But why?
    G IndescribablySad@threads.net
    That still sounds balanced-ish. If anything, it’s too front-loaded. A 9th level rogue would still have its typical kit of sneakiness, skill proficiencies, and sneak attack at 9th level, but it wouldn’t have a 9th level bump via archetype because it received a 6th level bump via archetype. A level 3 fighter/level 2 paladin wouldn’t get a second attack despite being a level 5 martial character, and they have to live with that mechanically poor decision. But they can instead choose to play until they become a level 5 fighter and then branch out instead, if they care to min/max. And what gives you the impression it has to be 50/50? A sportsman can be great at throwing or hitting a ball, but it’s vastly different between one sport and another. You can be an incredible baseball pitcher and a garbage basketball player. Level 3 arcane trickster/level 17 assassin makes perfect sense to me.
    Uncategorized rpgmemes

  • But why?
    G IndescribablySad@threads.net
    Pretty simple, just treat it like spellcaster multiclassing. Wizard/sorcerer/cleric/ 1/1/1 translates to a level 3 spellcaster for the sake of spell slots. Rogue 3/3 translates to class features level 6 and archetype feature level 1/1
    Uncategorized rpgmemes
  • 1 / 1
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
Powered by NodeBB Contributors
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups