A forum for discussing and organizing recreational softball and baseball games and leagues in the greater Halifax area.
My health potions are green and poisons are red
-
> "There are no 'rules' for fantasy" Wrong. To write *good* Fantasy (of SciFi), you have to go through a process called "World Building" where you lay down the rules of your world. Properly done, the amount of World Building exceeds the actual works by far. It is absolutely necessary to create a core of inner logic to the story. You are not bound by the rules of our world, yes, but you are bound by the rule of consistency. If you violate those, you automatically write crap Fantasy (or SciFi). Funny, though, that e.g. many literature teachers / professors don't even *know* about the idea of World Building.
-
Crap fantasy is still fantasy. Had a great time coming up with bad fantasy stories in my childhood when I knew nothing about good writing. Art is what you make it.
-
George Lucas is the perfect example what happens when you don't do world building. The Star Wars universe is basically just retcons stacked onto other retcons. And I am a firm believer that even short stories in a fantasy or SciFi setting don't work without at least a certain amount of world building. The number of fantasy and SciFi stories where the author thought they could get away without thinking their world through and which ended up badly is amazingly high.> George Lucas is the perfect example what happens when you don’t do world building. If you get into those coffee table books about the making of the first three movies, you find lots of works building. All the bounty hunters on the deck of Vader's Super Star Destroyer in Empire Strikes Back have canonical backstories, for instance. The cosmology of the galaxy - with Corusant at the center of the Empire and Tantoine way out in "Hutt Space" - was laid out by Lucas far in advance. "The Clone Wars" wasn't just an off-handed reference, it was a thing Lucas had defined as the WW2 precursor to New Hope's Vietnam. Hell, the fact that the first movie released was "Episode IV" should say it all. One reason you got so many derivative works following Return of the Jedi is that Lucas dumped his director's notes to the public as merch when production initially stalled on the Prequels.
-
> George Lucas is the perfect example what happens when you don’t do world building. If you get into those coffee table books about the making of the first three movies, you find lots of works building. All the bounty hunters on the deck of Vader's Super Star Destroyer in Empire Strikes Back have canonical backstories, for instance. The cosmology of the galaxy - with Corusant at the center of the Empire and Tantoine way out in "Hutt Space" - was laid out by Lucas far in advance. "The Clone Wars" wasn't just an off-handed reference, it was a thing Lucas had defined as the WW2 precursor to New Hope's Vietnam. Hell, the fact that the first movie released was "Episode IV" should say it all. One reason you got so many derivative works following Return of the Jedi is that Lucas dumped his director's notes to the public as merch when production initially stalled on the Prequels.> If you get into those coffee table books about the making of the first three movies, you find lots of world building. You are well aware that those *are* retcon? None of this existed *before* "A New Hope". Most of it was done later by specialists hired by LucasFilm.
-
> If you get into those coffee table books about the making of the first three movies, you find lots of world building. You are well aware that those *are* retcon? None of this existed *before* "A New Hope". Most of it was done later by specialists hired by LucasFilm.> You are well aware that those are retcon? None of this existed before “A New Hope”. Lucas had reems of material he used to turn out multiple screenplays before he ended on New Hope. That's a big part of where those changes in the re-releases came from.
-
Nah this one is easy. If it's green and _sparkly,_ it's a good thing. If it's green and _bubbly,_ it's a bad thing.Given what Mountain Dew has done to me, that tracks.
-
> "There are no 'rules' for fantasy" Wrong. To write *good* Fantasy (of SciFi), you have to go through a process called "World Building" where you lay down the rules of your world. Properly done, the amount of World Building exceeds the actual works by far. It is absolutely necessary to create a core of inner logic to the story. You are not bound by the rules of our world, yes, but you are bound by the rule of consistency. If you violate those, you automatically write crap Fantasy (or SciFi). Funny, though, that e.g. many literature teachers / professors don't even *know* about the idea of World Building.That's hard fantasy. Soft fantasy can be good too.
-
That's hard fantasy. Soft fantasy can be good too.
-
I used yellow for health to avoid red/green colourblind issuesI'm not sure if that's a joke? If you have red/green colorblindness, you wouldn't be able to distinguish yellow either. You'd just see blue and not blue.
-
I'm not sure if that's a joke? If you have red/green colorblindness, you wouldn't be able to distinguish yellow either. You'd just see blue and not blue.https://davidmathlogic.com/colorblind/ https://color.adobe.com/ You can use this to come up with a palette, mine was safe
