Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Chebucto Regional Softball Club

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. I think it’s more about the fact that he’s a real estate developer.
A forum for discussing and organizing recreational softball and baseball games and leagues in the greater Halifax area.

I think it’s more about the fact that he’s a real estate developer.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
66 Posts 20 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

    I think it’s more about the fact that he’s a real estate developer. The one thing that he actually knows is how to do is a real estate project: he has actual experience, knows the process end to end. It’s probably very comforting for him to work on something where he’s not out of his depth.

    (for this reason the only thing I don’t worry about with this clown show is the white house construction)

    Claire, The Ultimate WorrierW This user is from outside of this forum
    Claire, The Ultimate WorrierW This user is from outside of this forum
    Claire, The Ultimate Worrier
    wrote last edited by
    #2

    @futurebird yeah I've heard that analysis before that he really has a thing for big construction projects which kind of showed up with how obsessed he was with building his wall

    myrmepropagandistF 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Claire, The Ultimate WorrierW Claire, The Ultimate Worrier

      @futurebird yeah I've heard that analysis before that he really has a thing for big construction projects which kind of showed up with how obsessed he was with building his wall

      myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
      myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
      myrmepropagandist
      wrote last edited by
      #3

      @waitworry

      That is too technical of a project and too big. Remodeling is fine.

      ? 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

        @waitworry

        That is too technical of a project and too big. Remodeling is fine.

        ? Offline
        ? Offline
        Guest
        wrote last edited by
        #4

        @futurebird @waitworry The whole process introduces a lot of opportunities for shoddy workmanship and poor materials (and his trademark stiffing the contractors move).

        I anticipate a *hefty* post-construction maintenance bill, not to mention the cost of the work to make it harmonious with the rest of the building when we have the ability to do so. (I don't know how expensive it is to remove the Regional Car Dealership Rococo* trimmings when they've been built in, but I expect it won't be cheap.)

        *Hat tip to McMansion Hell: https://www.patreon.com/posts/mcmansionization-126873692

        myrmepropagandistF 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • ? Guest

          @futurebird @waitworry The whole process introduces a lot of opportunities for shoddy workmanship and poor materials (and his trademark stiffing the contractors move).

          I anticipate a *hefty* post-construction maintenance bill, not to mention the cost of the work to make it harmonious with the rest of the building when we have the ability to do so. (I don't know how expensive it is to remove the Regional Car Dealership Rococo* trimmings when they've been built in, but I expect it won't be cheap.)

          *Hat tip to McMansion Hell: https://www.patreon.com/posts/mcmansionization-126873692

          myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
          myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
          myrmepropagandist
          wrote last edited by futurebird@sauropods.win
          #5

          @robotistry @waitworry

          OK I deeply resent being put in a position of doing anything even adjacent to "defending" anything this man has done... HOWEVER.

          His buildings are the only projects he's ever made money on. They were kind of on time (as much as is expected in that field) and they are "not dysfunctional" I don't like his taste. But it met "market needs."

          The Whitehouse is an ugly building. Uglier than Trump Tower. There. I said it. I hate that plantation-looking stuffy old building.

          myrmepropagandistF 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist shared this topic
          • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

            @robotistry @waitworry

            OK I deeply resent being put in a position of doing anything even adjacent to "defending" anything this man has done... HOWEVER.

            His buildings are the only projects he's ever made money on. They were kind of on time (as much as is expected in that field) and they are "not dysfunctional" I don't like his taste. But it met "market needs."

            The Whitehouse is an ugly building. Uglier than Trump Tower. There. I said it. I hate that plantation-looking stuffy old building.

            myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
            myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
            myrmepropagandist
            wrote last edited by
            #6

            @robotistry @waitworry

            I expect the new ballroom wing to be just as bad as what it replaced. In that sense it will be a continuation of the tradition of this kind of architecture.

            But if we need to tear the wing down again we can.

            myrmepropagandistF Spo0000opybirb :flag_cascadia:M ? NazoN 4 Replies Last reply
            1
            0
            • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

              @robotistry @waitworry

              I expect the new ballroom wing to be just as bad as what it replaced. In that sense it will be a continuation of the tradition of this kind of architecture.

              But if we need to tear the wing down again we can.

              myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
              myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
              myrmepropagandist
              wrote last edited by
              #7

              @robotistry @waitworry

              And that's enough "hot takes" from me for one day.

              Martin Vermeer FCDM myrmepropagandistF 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

                @robotistry @waitworry

                And that's enough "hot takes" from me for one day.

                Martin Vermeer FCDM This user is from outside of this forum
                Martin Vermeer FCDM This user is from outside of this forum
                Martin Vermeer FCD
                wrote last edited by
                #8

                @futurebird @robotistry @waitworry Thinking of the Eiffel Tower for some reason

                myrmepropagandistF 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

                  I think it’s more about the fact that he’s a real estate developer. The one thing that he actually knows is how to do is a real estate project: he has actual experience, knows the process end to end. It’s probably very comforting for him to work on something where he’s not out of his depth.

                  (for this reason the only thing I don’t worry about with this clown show is the white house construction)

                  JimmyJ This user is from outside of this forum
                  JimmyJ This user is from outside of this forum
                  Jimmy
                  wrote last edited by
                  #9

                  @futurebird His past history is one of failure. Trump projects are always shoddy.

                  myrmepropagandistF 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

                    @robotistry @waitworry

                    And that's enough "hot takes" from me for one day.

                    myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                    myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                    myrmepropagandist
                    wrote last edited by
                    #10

                    @robotistry @waitworry

                    But listen if this is the last straw for some people ... great.

                    I do wonder how such a person missed all of the other much larger and more massive straws. My camel's back broke long ago. Back in 2016 if not before that.

                    myrmepropagandistF 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • JimmyJ Jimmy

                      @futurebird His past history is one of failure. Trump projects are always shoddy.

                      myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                      myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                      myrmepropagandist
                      wrote last edited by
                      #11

                      @jhavok ?

                      Real Estate is a forgiving enough business that he didn't totally bungle that one.

                      Stiff contractors? Still got the work done. Isn't it charming.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

                        @robotistry @waitworry

                        I expect the new ballroom wing to be just as bad as what it replaced. In that sense it will be a continuation of the tradition of this kind of architecture.

                        But if we need to tear the wing down again we can.

                        Spo0000opybirb :flag_cascadia:M This user is from outside of this forum
                        Spo0000opybirb :flag_cascadia:M This user is from outside of this forum
                        Spo0000opybirb :flag_cascadia:
                        wrote last edited by
                        #12

                        @futurebird @robotistry @waitworry Oh, I think it'll be worse; they're moving from (fairly low-grade) Federalist to Bank Neoclassical. The columns will be bigger and uglier, with the intent of being more imposing and feeling like, well, an investment bank. I like to think it's because this is where you come to give Trump money.

                        The old building wasn't much but it wasn't a statement, either. They mostly built it to hide the bunker underneath. Either way, it'll be uglier, both visually and spiritually, in intent.

                        myrmepropagandistF 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

                          @robotistry @waitworry

                          I expect the new ballroom wing to be just as bad as what it replaced. In that sense it will be a continuation of the tradition of this kind of architecture.

                          But if we need to tear the wing down again we can.

                          ? Offline
                          ? Offline
                          Guest
                          wrote last edited by
                          #13

                          @futurebird @robotistry @waitworry "But if we need to tear the wing down again we can." This is what I've been thinking, too. The original East Wing replaced stuff that had been there, and this monstrosity can be replaced, as well.

                          Luka RubinjoniR 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • Martin Vermeer FCDM Martin Vermeer FCD

                            @futurebird @robotistry @waitworry Thinking of the Eiffel Tower for some reason

                            myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                            myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                            myrmepropagandist
                            wrote last edited by futurebird@sauropods.win
                            #14

                            @martinvermeer @robotistry @waitworry

                            one can become attached to anything.

                            Ángela Stella MatutinaA 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • Spo0000opybirb :flag_cascadia:M Spo0000opybirb :flag_cascadia:

                              @futurebird @robotistry @waitworry Oh, I think it'll be worse; they're moving from (fairly low-grade) Federalist to Bank Neoclassical. The columns will be bigger and uglier, with the intent of being more imposing and feeling like, well, an investment bank. I like to think it's because this is where you come to give Trump money.

                              The old building wasn't much but it wasn't a statement, either. They mostly built it to hide the bunker underneath. Either way, it'll be uglier, both visually and spiritually, in intent.

                              myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                              myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                              myrmepropagandist
                              wrote last edited by
                              #15

                              @moira @robotistry @waitworry

                              I think you are underestimating how ugly "plantation bunker" really is.

                              I mean... I'll take the bank.

                              Spo0000opybirb :flag_cascadia:M 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

                                @martinvermeer @robotistry @waitworry

                                one can become attached to anything.

                                Ángela Stella MatutinaA This user is from outside of this forum
                                Ángela Stella MatutinaA This user is from outside of this forum
                                Ángela Stella Matutina
                                wrote last edited by
                                #16

                                @futurebird @martinvermeer @robotistry @waitworry

                                It became a scientific resource back in the day. Cosmic rays! Radio!

                                myrmepropagandistF 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

                                  I think it’s more about the fact that he’s a real estate developer. The one thing that he actually knows is how to do is a real estate project: he has actual experience, knows the process end to end. It’s probably very comforting for him to work on something where he’s not out of his depth.

                                  (for this reason the only thing I don’t worry about with this clown show is the white house construction)

                                  ? Offline
                                  ? Offline
                                  Guest
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #17

                                  @futurebird
                                  You know he has a history of buying cheap labour and then not paying for it, right?

                                  myrmepropagandistF 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • ? Guest

                                    @futurebird
                                    You know he has a history of buying cheap labour and then not paying for it, right?

                                    myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                                    myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                                    myrmepropagandist
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #18

                                    @mysturji

                                    I know about the not paying for it part. Where does the "cheap labor" come from. At least in NYC some of the contractors he stiffed did excellent work.

                                    ? 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • Ángela Stella MatutinaA Ángela Stella Matutina

                                      @futurebird @martinvermeer @robotistry @waitworry

                                      It became a scientific resource back in the day. Cosmic rays! Radio!

                                      myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                                      myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                                      myrmepropagandist
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #19

                                      @angelastella @martinvermeer @robotistry @waitworry

                                      Would we love it if it wasn't desperately old?

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

                                        @robotistry @waitworry

                                        But listen if this is the last straw for some people ... great.

                                        I do wonder how such a person missed all of the other much larger and more massive straws. My camel's back broke long ago. Back in 2016 if not before that.

                                        myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                                        myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                                        myrmepropagandist
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #20

                                        @robotistry

                                        Okay I will say one more thing. The only reason I'm running my mouth putting a little cold water on the notion that "tearing down the East Wing of the White House is architectural terrorism etc. etc." is because I sincerely think it could go one of many ways. Generally presidents hate to make dramatic changes to the White House because of exactly this kind of reaction. (And it's not the oldest part, so come on.)

                                        myrmepropagandistF 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

                                          @robotistry

                                          Okay I will say one more thing. The only reason I'm running my mouth putting a little cold water on the notion that "tearing down the East Wing of the White House is architectural terrorism etc. etc." is because I sincerely think it could go one of many ways. Generally presidents hate to make dramatic changes to the White House because of exactly this kind of reaction. (And it's not the oldest part, so come on.)

                                          myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                                          myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                                          myrmepropagandist
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #21

                                          @robotistry

                                          It could be that in some happy future we write "Nearly everything that occurred during the Trump presidency was a disaster, except for the White House renovation."

                                          Is it very likely? I give it a chance.

                                          I also understand that he has not earned the trust to do this, so if people find it upsetting that is very reasonable.

                                          (And I really do think that building was ugly and dysfunctional.)

                                          myrmepropagandistF David NjokuD MaysonLancasterM 3 Replies Last reply
                                          1
                                          0

                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • 1
                                          • 2
                                          • 3
                                          • 4
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups