I think it’s more about the fact that he’s a real estate developer.
-
@futurebird His past history is one of failure. Trump projects are always shoddy.
@jhavok ?
Real Estate is a forgiving enough business that he didn't totally bungle that one.
Stiff contractors? Still got the work done. Isn't it charming.
-
I expect the new ballroom wing to be just as bad as what it replaced. In that sense it will be a continuation of the tradition of this kind of architecture.
But if we need to tear the wing down again we can.
@futurebird @robotistry @waitworry Oh, I think it'll be worse; they're moving from (fairly low-grade) Federalist to Bank Neoclassical. The columns will be bigger and uglier, with the intent of being more imposing and feeling like, well, an investment bank. I like to think it's because this is where you come to give Trump money.
The old building wasn't much but it wasn't a statement, either. They mostly built it to hide the bunker underneath. Either way, it'll be uglier, both visually and spiritually, in intent.
-
I expect the new ballroom wing to be just as bad as what it replaced. In that sense it will be a continuation of the tradition of this kind of architecture.
But if we need to tear the wing down again we can.
@futurebird @robotistry @waitworry "But if we need to tear the wing down again we can." This is what I've been thinking, too. The original East Wing replaced stuff that had been there, and this monstrosity can be replaced, as well.
-
@futurebird @robotistry @waitworry Thinking of the Eiffel Tower for some reason
@martinvermeer @robotistry @waitworry
one can become attached to anything.
-
@futurebird @robotistry @waitworry Oh, I think it'll be worse; they're moving from (fairly low-grade) Federalist to Bank Neoclassical. The columns will be bigger and uglier, with the intent of being more imposing and feeling like, well, an investment bank. I like to think it's because this is where you come to give Trump money.
The old building wasn't much but it wasn't a statement, either. They mostly built it to hide the bunker underneath. Either way, it'll be uglier, both visually and spiritually, in intent.
I think you are underestimating how ugly "plantation bunker" really is.
I mean... I'll take the bank.
-
@martinvermeer @robotistry @waitworry
one can become attached to anything.
@futurebird @martinvermeer @robotistry @waitworry
It became a scientific resource back in the day. Cosmic rays! Radio!
-
I think it’s more about the fact that he’s a real estate developer. The one thing that he actually knows is how to do is a real estate project: he has actual experience, knows the process end to end. It’s probably very comforting for him to work on something where he’s not out of his depth.
(for this reason the only thing I don’t worry about with this clown show is the white house construction)
@futurebird
You know he has a history of buying cheap labour and then not paying for it, right? -
@futurebird
You know he has a history of buying cheap labour and then not paying for it, right?I know about the not paying for it part. Where does the "cheap labor" come from. At least in NYC some of the contractors he stiffed did excellent work.
-
@futurebird @martinvermeer @robotistry @waitworry
It became a scientific resource back in the day. Cosmic rays! Radio!
@angelastella @martinvermeer @robotistry @waitworry
Would we love it if it wasn't desperately old?
-
But listen if this is the last straw for some people ... great.
I do wonder how such a person missed all of the other much larger and more massive straws. My camel's back broke long ago. Back in 2016 if not before that.
Okay I will say one more thing. The only reason I'm running my mouth putting a little cold water on the notion that "tearing down the East Wing of the White House is architectural terrorism etc. etc." is because I sincerely think it could go one of many ways. Generally presidents hate to make dramatic changes to the White House because of exactly this kind of reaction. (And it's not the oldest part, so come on.)
-
Okay I will say one more thing. The only reason I'm running my mouth putting a little cold water on the notion that "tearing down the East Wing of the White House is architectural terrorism etc. etc." is because I sincerely think it could go one of many ways. Generally presidents hate to make dramatic changes to the White House because of exactly this kind of reaction. (And it's not the oldest part, so come on.)
It could be that in some happy future we write "Nearly everything that occurred during the Trump presidency was a disaster, except for the White House renovation."
Is it very likely? I give it a chance.
I also understand that he has not earned the trust to do this, so if people find it upsetting that is very reasonable.
(And I really do think that building was ugly and dysfunctional.)
-
It could be that in some happy future we write "Nearly everything that occurred during the Trump presidency was a disaster, except for the White House renovation."
Is it very likely? I give it a chance.
I also understand that he has not earned the trust to do this, so if people find it upsetting that is very reasonable.
(And I really do think that building was ugly and dysfunctional.)
I'm not saying stop making fun of it. Just wondering if this one will hold up.
I expect most of what we are seeing to age like bodega milk in august. Renovations take a certain kind of person to get them done. Especially in places like NYC. If you listen to everyone who has a concern nothing will get built and it's the 2nd Ave. Subway.
Just build it.
-
I think it’s more about the fact that he’s a real estate developer. The one thing that he actually knows is how to do is a real estate project: he has actual experience, knows the process end to end. It’s probably very comforting for him to work on something where he’s not out of his depth.
(for this reason the only thing I don’t worry about with this clown show is the white house construction)
@futurebird Doesn't he mostly just lease the rights to his name and not actually develop shit himself? He was involved in actually building stuff with his dad back in the 70s and 80s but seems like it's been mostly buying out other companies and selling licensing deals since then...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/world/trump-worldwide-licensing/
-
@futurebird Doesn't he mostly just lease the rights to his name and not actually develop shit himself? He was involved in actually building stuff with his dad back in the 70s and 80s but seems like it's been mostly buying out other companies and selling licensing deals since then...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/world/trump-worldwide-licensing/
That was after they let him into the entertainment business. Something that never should have been done. And something that the people who green-lit and produced the Apprentice have never really owned.
He'd still be flopping around doing things with a few buildings otherwise.
-
That was after they let him into the entertainment business. Something that never should have been done. And something that the people who green-lit and produced the Apprentice have never really owned.
He'd still be flopping around doing things with a few buildings otherwise.
@futurebird I dunno, seems like he started by developing new buildings and slapping his name on them, then he went to buying existing buildings and slapping his name on them, then to just letting other people slap his name on their own buildings...which makes me feel like it was never about the buildings as much as just about having his name all over a bunch of big shit.
He just wants the majority of the White House to forever be known as the Trump Ballroom. Lincoln Bedroom? How cute. Just one teeeny little room!
-
@futurebird I dunno, seems like he started by developing new buildings and slapping his name on them, then he went to buying existing buildings and slapping his name on them, then to just letting other people slap his name on their own buildings...which makes me feel like it was never about the buildings as much as just about having his name all over a bunch of big shit.
He just wants the majority of the White House to forever be known as the Trump Ballroom. Lincoln Bedroom? How cute. Just one teeeny little room!
We must never forget this. Let it be so.
-
I think you are underestimating how ugly "plantation bunker" really is.
I mean... I'll take the bank.
@futurebird @robotistry @waitworry Eh, maybe. I associate Bank Classical with _fascist_ Classical real hard, so that's got to be an influence. And they're definitely doing the Hitlerian version of Bank Classical in the renders, so.
-
@futurebird @robotistry @waitworry "But if we need to tear the wing down again we can." This is what I've been thinking, too. The original East Wing replaced stuff that had been there, and this monstrosity can be replaced, as well.
@mfennvt @futurebird @robotistry @waitworry Yeah, Nixon removed the Johnson cleaning station.
-
@mfennvt @futurebird @robotistry @waitworry Yeah, Nixon removed the Johnson cleaning station.
@rubinjoni @mfennvt @robotistry @waitworry
The WHAT?
-
It could be that in some happy future we write "Nearly everything that occurred during the Trump presidency was a disaster, except for the White House renovation."
Is it very likely? I give it a chance.
I also understand that he has not earned the trust to do this, so if people find it upsetting that is very reasonable.
(And I really do think that building was ugly and dysfunctional.)
@futurebird I recognise that I don't get a say since it's not my country, but I've been feeling the exact same way. Unless there's a tradition that presidents must never change the white house then I can't get animated about this.
Over here in Britain, there was a scandal about Boris Johnson redecorating No.10. I didn't like the man, but couldn't give a shit.
The real scandal, I guess, is that Johnson & Trump have taken money from donors to pay for it
@robotistry