A forum for discussing and organizing recreational softball and baseball games and leagues in the greater Halifax area.
The new owner of GOG discusses taking on Steam, the devil of DRM, and following in Nightdive's footsteps
-
They've got some of those things. They recently added a workshop equivalent, and they've had a multiplayer SDK for a long time. The multiplayer SDK is actually a problem, because it means multiplayer often only works on Galaxy, which is just DRM by another name. And Steam's DRM was pretty invisible to me until, ironically, I got a Steam Deck. Then I started running into games that needed to be authenticated while I was on a train with no internet.As long as games stop using shitty Epic Online Services, I'll take GOG's.
-
Well the new owner, was one of the original founders.
-
The advantage to Epic's is that they offer cross play for free. I'm honestly not sure what the problem is.
-
The advantage to Epic's is that they offer cross play for free. I'm honestly not sure what the problem is.Epic Games is a scumbag company
-
>"Being a healthy company means having healthy results." But he adds that money won't be the main motivating factor, and instead the focus is to "do a good job, have good products and good services, and then as a consequence and as a reward comes good money." It's a point that he thinks is obvious, "but many companies fall apart on that, putting the spreadsheets first." Such a refreshing take.It always is in the beginning ~~Don't be evil~~
-
GOG needs to fix their client first and port it on Linux. Yes, Heroic is a thing but we do need better handheld compatibility anyway and Linux users, I think, are more likely to be invested in GOG mission.Theres a reason steam is king... noone else bother putting games on linux, so valve brought linux to the games.
-
It always is in the beginning ~~Don't be evil~~We got enough bad shit and greed in the world. I'll celebrate good things when I see them.
-
Theres a reason steam is king... noone else bother putting games on linux, so valve brought linux to the games.
-
Yeah for external DRM, but if a game has Steam DRM, then there's no official label or warning. For example, Witcher 3 is DRM-free on Steam, but there's nothing (AFAIK) on the Steam page saying that.
-
maybe they didnt add it cause "The DRM is noteable for only protecting against extremely casual piracy (i.e. copying game files between friends), and is primarily used by game developers to ensure proper Steam/Steamworks API functionality within their games for legitimate users." [Source](https://www.pcgamingwiki.com/wiki/Digital_Rights_Management_(DRM))
-
We got enough bad shit and greed in the world. I'll celebrate good things when I see them.
-
Or, you could say Valve took the work of thousand of open-source dev and saw an opportunity to turn it into profit. I'm not saying they didn't contribute, but the only reason is because they saw a opportunity to make money, they don't care about Linux.They absolutely do care about linux... sure, they are profit motivated. But they saw microsoft building their own store, and they saw a future where MS builds a gated garden, and linux was a way for them to preserve their existence.
-
I mean, that's the only issue. I put Steam on my Gentoo. Because it works, and I get 0 hassle gaming experience. Guess who gets my money?
-
maybe they didnt add it cause "The DRM is noteable for only protecting against extremely casual piracy (i.e. copying game files between friends), and is primarily used by game developers to ensure proper Steam/Steamworks API functionality within their games for legitimate users." [Source](https://www.pcgamingwiki.com/wiki/Digital_Rights_Management_(DRM))
-
Extremely casual piracy? I suppose fair point. But now what does each step in the scale mean then. For example what is extreme professional piracy or something.
