A forum for discussing and organizing recreational softball and baseball games and leagues in the greater Halifax area.
The Dice Giveth...
-
> Isn’t that right foot easy stuff? Sorry, don't know if I understand what you mean with that. > Why should they fail to tie a simple knot on a +5, dc5 use rope check 1 in 20 times? Why should they roll for something as simple as tieing a simple knot? I don't make my players roll whether they manage to tie their shoes either.Swipe typo. Corrected now
-
> Isn’t that right foot easy stuff? Sorry, don't know if I understand what you mean with that. > Why should they fail to tie a simple knot on a +5, dc5 use rope check 1 in 20 times? Why should they roll for something as simple as tieing a simple knot? I don't make my players roll whether they manage to tie their shoes either.A simple knot like the bowline you'd tie around a sturdy tree before descending by rope into a hole That's exactly the sort of thing a DM would set as DC10
-
A simple knot like the bowline you'd tie around a sturdy tree before descending by rope into a hole That's exactly the sort of thing a DM would set as DC10
-
When you're +12 to stealth a 1 isn't that critical
-
That's the only way I'm willing to house rule this. If 1 fails regardless, 20 succeeds regardless But I prefer to call things easy or impossible
-
If you can't fail a skill check, there should be no roll. Same as most DMs won't make you do a skill check for "I sit down on a chair". Rolling dice implies that there's a chance of failure. > Failed skill checks on 1 break d&d by making skilled people fail regularly just as less skilled people do. Nope. 1/20 is much less regular than 5/20 or even 19/20. More skill doesn't mean it always works, only that your chances are higher. And if you are skilled enough that it always works, then there should be no roll.>Nope. 1/20 is much less regular than 5/20 or even 19/20. What do you mean here? Any roll is as likely as any other Do you mean 2-20 is more likely than rolling a 1? Of course it is, but an invisible rogue sneaking at +15 shouldn't be seen by the monster who's -4 to spot 1 in 20 events, or if 20s are also special, 1 in 10 events (one for the rogue getting a 1, one for monster getting a 20)
-
If the sneaking person rolls a 13 +12, yeah it would be DC25 to see them. If they rolled a 1 the DC would be 13
-
If your skill level would guarantee a win if you ignore the concept of a natural 1 auto-failing, then there should be no roll.If everyone is aware. If the player knows the DC and the GM knows the players character sheet
-
>Nope. 1/20 is much less regular than 5/20 or even 19/20. What do you mean here? Any roll is as likely as any other Do you mean 2-20 is more likely than rolling a 1? Of course it is, but an invisible rogue sneaking at +15 shouldn't be seen by the monster who's -4 to spot 1 in 20 events, or if 20s are also special, 1 in 10 events (one for the rogue getting a 1, one for monster getting a 20)
-
If the sneaking person rolls a 13 +12, yeah it would be DC25 to see them. If they rolled a 1 the DC would be 13
-
>Nope. 1/20 is much less regular than 5/20 or even 19/20. What do you mean here? Any roll is as likely as any other Do you mean 2-20 is more likely than rolling a 1? Of course it is, but an invisible rogue sneaking at +15 shouldn't be seen by the monster who's -4 to spot 1 in 20 events, or if 20s are also special, 1 in 10 events (one for the rogue getting a 1, one for monster getting a 20)They're talking the probability of failure, not the specific number on the die. If your skill bonus meets the DC, you have a 1/20 chance of failing, assuming a natural one equates to an auto-fail. If your bonus doesn't meet the DC, you have a higher chance of failing.