Ok, but hear me out: If you accelerate something into a freefall orbit, then it stands to reason that the projectile would deal falling damage (equal and opposite force, you know) which maxes out at 20 d6.

Applying real world logic to game rules never works out. Also, you forget to take into account the weapon's weight, form, structural integrity, the commoner's reaction time, probability to fumble, the force of the wind, and probably a few dozen other factors that have an effect in the real world. Just don't. It's a game.

I was just making a joke.

If a character has 121hp or more they're able to jump from a space station onto earth with like a super hero landing??

theyd also need something to protect them from the friction and resulting heat of air brushing by at terminal velocity tho, i assume?

I want to play a game where there is an NPC roving band of guerrilla peasants that in times of crisis form a rail gun militia. Dragons? Rail gun. Tax Administrator? Rail gun. Cathy's Baby Shower? Also believe it or not, rail gun.

Terminal velocity for a human is not fast enough to cause air to heat up. You'd probably get frostburn instead.

If you can manage to some some*one* I to freefall I'd allow it. But no, equal opposite forces doesn't mean you roll dice the same lol. Your sword does not take damage when you attack with it.

If you're jumping from a space station then you'd be traveling at orbital velocity when hitting the atmosphere which is plenty fast enough to generate heat.

The obvious use of the peasant railgun is instant delivery. Gonna start my new enterprise, pFood, coming at you within 1 turn or your money back!

Unless the space station is not orbiting. Maybe it's a mobile one like the Desthstar.

Fun fact about this in real life: A problem that gunmakers have had to deal with is that, although a faster-moving bullet fires straighter and penetrates better into its target, if the bullet moves *too* fast it will just poke a hole straight through a person without imparting enough of its kinetic energy onto them to be able to do real damage.

In 5e yes. I think the theory is once you hit terminal velocity, you aren't going to get any more damage from a longer fall. Fun fact, I actually did have a villain do exactly that in a campaign once. The party achieved a secondary win condition during combat and so the BBEG jumped off the top of the space elevator to escape.

There's a lot of factors, shape speed and deformation are all factors. Penetration and energy transfer are also at odds with each other in general. Gun manufacturers have this problem because speed is more or less capped by a practical barrel length, a rail gun can (theoretically) achieve enough speed that either factors start to become less relevant.

Pure theory, likely never ever going to be real, but could a bullet move so fast that it goes through someone without even damaging them?

... the death star orbits. The timer for the rebels to blow it up in a New Hope was how long its orbit would take to clear the moon in its path to the rebel base. The battle of endor was fought over the new death star in orbit over the moon. Yes, the death star is capable of warp, but that just puts it into orbit over different things.

> Cathy's Baby Shower? Also believe it or not, rail gun. Handing out gifts at the speed of sound.

That is simply not true. All you have to do is design your projectile in shape, construction and materials so the kinetic energy gets properly used to cause damage to the target. A tiny 40 grain .204 Ruger bullet with the absolutely insane muzzle velocity of 4100 fps will absolutely explode a watermelon if you use a rapidly expanding projectile such as a basic tipped varmint round. As a matter of fact, the problem you can recounted with projectiles that go too fast is that they will over expand and under penetrate depending on the nature of the target.

No, but it travels fast enough it would disintegrate and you could argue the resulting fireball would be what actually damaged the target. [Relevant XKCD.](https://youtu.be/3EI08o-IGYk)