F
Online groups can make it easier for people to be fooled by this stuff. But normally Black guys who end up in these places are usually just extraordinarily sexist in my experience. Too sexist for regular folks. But also without the self awareness to realize when they are being laughed at.
But they also do the flashing of left wing stuff just to sow confusion. They are all in with the "blame the left" game.
yelling at the screen like it's a horror movie.
Context: groypers are a very online "community" of nihilistic neo-nazis mostly in the US who follow squirrely little man called "Nick Fuentes" he has a podcast and mostly whips them up into protesting right wing people for not being right wing enough (eg. Charlie Kirk) but they also love to spam the n-word at black people on social media. It's very classy mature stuff.
I saw some videos of their protests and there was a black guy and I was so sad for him. I do think he will be hurt.
why are there black groypers those people will kill you when they get drunk one night (as a "joke" ) please run away brother run. I know you are all mixed up and confused but these people are not your friends.
you are an expendable mascot.
I post poems from time to time.
No matter if people like it or not.
63.5K Posts, 6.38K Following, 18.8K Followers · pro-ant propaganda, building electronics, writing sci-fi teaching mathematics & CS. I live in NYC.🎖️(<
Sauropods.win (sauropods.win)
So like every street address is now a website?
More like zero day and seeing stars.
To the extent that addressing the climate crisis looks anything like austerity the richest must go first and take the biggest hit.
That's just ... fair.
I agree. But I also think it will be hard, unreasonable even to expect everyone to adapt to pull the breaks on the climate crisis as long as a bunch of the richest jerks you can think of keep flying around in jets.
We need to replace shorter plane flights with trains for example. Some people will think that's a downgrade (it's not but whatever)
It's symbolically important.
IDK per person they are pretty bad.
What a nightmare. “the perpetual future” sounds like the title of a cyberpunk horror novel.
I am but a simple school teacher, so perhaps I’m missing something these businesses-folk see that I do not— however: why do they think the price would go down? I thought this stage of the AI business model was like the early days of uber and amazon wherein they corner the market, addict the consumer and then the hammer comes down and big profits emerge (or not)
Is that what’s making all the terrible websites that come up in search?
what happens when they raise the price? are they indispensable? or all these things "chat bots" that try to talk to you while you use a website that could be easily scrapped?
Compared to the level of investment there just aren't as many people diving in. And some who dive in will find out it's not doing much and pull out.
yeah... 
i am the goblin who eats the homework feed me! nom nom nom
Another overlapping perspective. There is an AI bubble. The "High Yield" video makes these data centers sound inevitable and unstoppable. But, what if all of this infrastructure isn't really producing any value? Or enough value?
OpenAI has only a handful of customers and most of them are using it to do their homework for them. We discussed "Vibe Coding" last week and no one can agree on if it saves any time or not.
Ed Zitro makes the case for the bubble on MR.
Here is a good overview on trends in datacenters. (Did you know they are planning on firing up 3 mile island again? Truly, we live in a 1970s revival)