Not only will it last but you can get colors that won't fade. They have found ancient examples of this work and it looks... new.
futurebird@sauropods.win
Posts
-
Concept: -
Concept:There was a typo:
Print on aged flat oak spaniels.
I was worried someone like you might see it and then... well.
-
Concept:An oil painting on wood will also last a long time, but it may require more regular care to look as good as it did the day you made it.
A mosaic is also very durable. But you need a good place to bury it. Can't just put it in a box in the back of the attic with a label that says "treasure"
-
Concept:Please do not print hot wax onto small expensive dogs, no mater how wooden they may seem.
-
Concept:The only thing that might be more robust is a bronze sculpture. But that would mean not saving the colors.
-
Concept:Concept:
Modified multi-color 3D printer that takes sticks of encastic painting wax. Print on aged flat oak panels.
Print high quality images in wax. Cover with a layer of clear encastic wax by hand to seal.
Encastic paintings last for centuries with very little care beyond being stored in a forgiving temperature range.
Now you have automated a way to preserve a photograph for the ages.
-
They thought it was an anomaly.They thought it was an anomaly. A consequence of edge cases in the mathematics. A cuddles and pets singularity made sense... on paper, but how could a region of space from which nothing but purring escaped exist?
How could it be possible that adding more pets and cuddles only increased the horizon?
Wouldn't such a theoretical object, if real result in the whole universe becoming a single mass of affection controled by #PicaTheCat?
Impossible! They said.They were WRONG.
-
Immature Red-shouldered Hawk on a sunny morning during a past CBCAw come on they are doing their best. I think that is very mature. It's not like they are making too much noise or making a big mess.
-
My newest toxic trait is covertly taking pictures of strangers' well behaved dogs making funny faces.I enjoy when it's obviously a puppy just barely holding it together.
myrmepropagandist (@futurebird@sauropods.win)
Attached: 2 images There is a *very* silly puppy on this train. Still struggling with concepts such as which way is up. #nyc #puppy
Sauropods.win (sauropods.win)
-
Why unexpected phone calls are so stressing for me, example 2341.It is polite and wise to text "hey can I call you rn or u busy?"
or similar. To everyone. Except maybe your mom. Or at least my mom. She doesn't understand this and thinks it's strange when I do it.
-
My man is over here buying four legged transistors on etsy.My man is over here buying four legged transistors on etsy.
-
In the most general sense who is *more* likely to remember and hold to account a famous person who cheats on their committed partner having been transparently dishonest with them about the nature of that long term commitment?So a lot of this might just be the sexism.
As is often the case it seems. -
In the most general sense who is *more* likely to remember and hold to account a famous person who cheats on their committed partner having been transparently dishonest with them about the nature of that long term commitment? -
In the most general sense who is *more* likely to remember and hold to account a famous person who cheats on their committed partner having been transparently dishonest with them about the nature of that long term commitment?I think everyone will amplify these feelings if you already don't like the person.
But consider if our new left wing mayor of NYC were IDK caught with some hookers.
I think it'd be a huge disaster for him! And not just because the right would make a huge deal about it. Large portions of his base would flip out... because he's married. And we think that's so cute and he would have RUINED it.
(if he weren't married nobody would care as much)
-
In the most general sense who is *more* likely to remember and hold to account a famous person who cheats on their committed partner having been transparently dishonest with them about the nature of that long term commitment?Personally I think everyone has bright red lines of morality with respect to relationships. The right likes to describe the left as having no such lines but it really isn't true. They are just lines based on a different set of values.
The left wing values are centered around concepts like consent, honesty and being true to yourself.
Right wing values are centered around supporting social norms and not confusing people by being "abnormal."
-
@ZumbadorThose things will always be factors. Think of all of the "imagine of Obama did this" statements. What is that really saying?
-
In the most general sense who is *more* likely to remember and hold to account a famous person who cheats on their committed partner having been transparently dishonest with them about the nature of that long term commitment?Yeah you've been in France too long. They really do not care and I guess I'm a nebby and puritanical American.
-
In the most general sense who is *more* likely to remember and hold to account a famous person who cheats on their committed partner having been transparently dishonest with them about the nature of that long term commitment?This also wouldn't happen if it wasn't "real cheating" eg. it was an open relationship.
Nonetheless the left loooooves little cake topper couples in every variety. (gay ones too) and is endlessly confused by the trainwrecks that go by without comment all over the right.
-
In the most general sense who is *more* likely to remember and hold to account a famous person who cheats on their committed partner having been transparently dishonest with them about the nature of that long term commitment?My perception is that across the left including liberals relationship fidelity isn't talked about much but "cheaters" are punished by the public with more consistency and less likely to *ever* be forgiven.
On the right you hear about "family values" all the time, and one would think that a "cheater" would be in big trouble ... but... it just doesn't really matter that much to them.
A gay liberal politician who *dishonestly* cheated on his husband would lose more support than a right winger.
-
In the most general sense who is *more* likely to remember and hold to account a famous person who cheats on their committed partner having been transparently dishonest with them about the nature of that long term commitment?In the most general sense who is *more* likely to remember and hold to account a famous person who cheats on their committed partner having been transparently dishonest with them about the nature of that long term commitment?
(I'm trying to tease out the concept of dishonestly and breaking promises in relationships from "family values" which is a loaded phrase.)